<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel> 

	<title>Comments on: Comments on 8251</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/8251//</link>
	<description>Comments on MetaFilter post Comments on 8251</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2001 12:04:36 -0800</pubDate>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2001 12:04:36 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>

	<item>
		<title>Post number 8251</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/8251/</link>	
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.bugnosis.org/"&gt;Bugnosis&lt;/a&gt; A web bug detector to find out who&apos;s using single-pixel GIFs to relay information to third parties. Distributed by the folks at the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.privacyfoundation.org/&quot;&gt;Privacy Foundation&lt;/a&gt;.
&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;

I&apos;ve long wanted to have this information without mucking through the HTML source. Now that it&apos;s available, I don&apos;t know if I really want to know.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">post:www.metafilter.com,2001:site.8251</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2001 11:58:45 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>idiolect</dc:creator>		<category>bugnosis</category>		<category>bug</category>		<category>bugdetector</category>		<category>gif</category>		<category>html</category>		<category>security</category>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: dong_resin</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/8251/#93174</link>	
		<description>You want to know.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2001:site.8251-93174</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2001 12:04:36 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dong_resin</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: preguicoso</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/8251/#93190</link>	
		<description>I installed this a couple days ago.

Verdict?

Just about every corporate site uses web bugs.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2001:site.8251-93190</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2001 12:23:42 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>preguicoso</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: bliss322</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/8251/#93193</link>	
		<description>if you use bugnosis in conjunction with web washer, you find that web washer does a pretty good job of getting rid of bugs; although not all of them.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2001:site.8251-93193</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2001 12:26:47 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>bliss322</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: kindall</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/8251/#93196</link>	
		<description>&quot;Web bugs&quot; are a privacy threat only as part of e-mail messages, and then only if they have a unique identifier embedded in their URL.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2001:site.8251-93196</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2001 12:30:06 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>kindall</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: bliss322</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/8251/#93197</link>	
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.kottke.org&quot;&gt;kottke&lt;/a&gt; has bugs.  big amazon bugs!</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2001:site.8251-93197</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2001 12:33:06 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>bliss322</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: RylandDotNet</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/8251/#93212</link>	
		<description>I assume &quot;bugs&quot; in this case means cookies. Cookies are easy to block. Web Washer has been mentioned; I personally use &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.junkbuster.com/&quot;&gt;Junkbuster&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2001:site.8251-93212</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2001 12:59:26 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>RylandDotNet</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: kindall</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/8251/#93221</link>	
		<description>No, &quot;bugs&quot; does not mean &quot;cookies.&quot; &quot;Bugs&quot; means, essentally, image files retrieved for a page from another site so that the other site knows who&apos;s hitting the first site. In HTML e-mail messages, the image request may identify the e-mail address that&apos;s reading the message, which is the only real privacy issue involved.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2001:site.8251-93221</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2001 13:06:46 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>kindall</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: jragon</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/8251/#93243</link>	
		<description>Sound the alarm.  Doubleclick knows that I visited cnn.com.  I&apos;m outraged.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2001:site.8251-93243</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2001 13:23:34 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jragon</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: fooljay</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/8251/#93269</link>	
		<description>Yes, yes.  That&apos;s it.  Reduction to absurdity.  Very well done, jragon...  You should pat yourself on the back.  There is no spoon...</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2001:site.8251-93269</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2001 13:42:29 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>fooljay</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: Kino</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/8251/#93300</link>	
		<description>Now doubleclick knows that you know that they know that you visited cnn.com. Oh shit, now i&apos;m involved. They now know that i know that you know that they know that u did. Whatsmore, they know that i know that they know that, and that i&apos;ve told you that i know that they do. We&apos;re done for.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2001:site.8251-93300</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2001 14:12:59 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kino</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: RylandDotNet</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/8251/#93334</link>	
		<description>&lt;i&gt;No, &quot;bugs&quot; does not mean &quot;cookies.&quot; &quot;Bugs&quot; means, essentally, image files retrieved for a page from another site so that the other site knows who&apos;s hitting the first site.&lt;/i&gt;

Ah, I see. Well... A) Big deal. B) Junkbuster will still block it. I have it set to completely block traffic from lots of marketing sites, including Doubleclick.

&lt;i&gt;In HTML e-mail messages, the image request may identify the e-mail address that&apos;s reading the message, which is the only real privacy issue involved.&lt;/i&gt;

Good thing I use a non-HTML e-mail client. I know, this means I won&apos;t be able to send and receive e-mail using a 14pt purple Star Trek font, but that&apos;s a sacrifice I&apos;m willing to make to secure my computer system from those naughty spies.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2001:site.8251-93334</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2001 15:08:14 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>RylandDotNet</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: hincandenza</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/8251/#93370</link>	
		<description>For those who use IE- like me- there&apos;s also the &lt;b&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.microsoft.com/Windows/IE/WebAccess/default.asp&quot;&gt;Web Accessories&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt; plug-in, which adds some neat right-click functionality, including the Images List option (so you can see the 1x1 gifs).  Not that it alerts you the way Bugnosis apparently does, of course...</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2001:site.8251-93370</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2001 16:01:59 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>hincandenza</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: machaus</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/8251/#93389</link>	
		<description>Mac Huggers need not apply...</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2001:site.8251-93389</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2001 16:40:49 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>machaus</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: crunchland</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/8251/#93395</link>	
		<description>I tried this program. What a pain in the ass it is! Since there doesn&apos;t seem to be any way to filter which pages set off alarms and which ones don&apos;t -- which ones have acceptable, innocuous &quot;bugs&quot; and all others -- I uninstalled it about 30 minutes after I installed it.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2001:site.8251-93395</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2001 16:55:23 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>crunchland</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: christina</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/8251/#93423</link>	
		<description>Can you use webwasher with DSL? I miss missing pop-up ads... today the NYT launched a pop-up, albeit behind their site (very weird, and vaguely resembling politeness...)</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2001:site.8251-93423</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2001 17:31:21 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>christina</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: fooljay</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/8251/#93586</link>	
		<description>In short: all your surfing are belong to &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.doubleclick.com&quot;&gt;marketing people&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2001:site.8251-93586</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jun 2001 00:34:53 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>fooljay</dc:creator>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
