<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel> 

	<title>Comments on: Visual history of nurse uniforms</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/82596/Visual-history-of-nurse-uniforms/</link>
	<description>Comments on MetaFilter post Visual history of nurse uniforms</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 11:38:33 -0800</pubDate>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 11:38:33 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>

	<item>
		<title>Visual history of nurse uniforms</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/82596/Visual-history-of-nurse-uniforms</link>	
		<description>&lt;em&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://dyk2.homestead.com/Index.html&quot;&gt;This site&lt;/a&gt; is dedicated to those hardworking and underpaid Angels of  Mercy who, over the years, have made a stay in hospital that much more bearable. It&apos;s a growing collection of  images of  Nurses taken from  Film, TV and The Media from the 1930s to the present, showing how uniform styles have changed over the years.&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">post:www.metafilter.com,2009:site.82596</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 10:18:32 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Joe Beese</dc:creator>		<category>nurse</category>		<category>uniform</category>		<category>history</category>		<category>photography</category>		<category>health</category>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: Mountain Goatse</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/82596/Visual-history-of-nurse-uniforms#2613629</link>	
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://dyk3.homestead.com/SN.html&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;Four beautiful young students in their last year of nursing school work hard on their bedside manner to satisfy their patients&apos; every need.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt;

These hardworking and underpaid Angels of Mercy bare it all to make a stay in the hospital that much more bearable.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2009:site.82596-2613629</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 11:38:33 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mountain Goatse</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: xingcat</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/82596/Visual-history-of-nurse-uniforms#2613699</link>	
		<description>It&apos;s too bad there isn&apos;t a growing collection of images of web pages from the 1990s to the present, showing how styles have changed over the years.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2009:site.82596-2613699</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 12:15:27 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>xingcat</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: chesty_a_arthur</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/82596/Visual-history-of-nurse-uniforms#2613757</link>	
		<description>When I worked for a peer-reviewed nursing journal, I was looking for citations supporting some assertions an author had made in a sidebar about an exhibit of art based on historic nursing uniforms. One was a reference to a New Yorker article, and I couldn&apos;t find the page numbers anywhere -- it was apparently totally unindexed and I was up against a deadline; didn&apos;t have time to go to the library and brute-force it through the stacks. I ultimately found it cited completely and correctly on a Web page for medical fetishists. 

And that&apos;s why Web filtering in the workplace is wrong.

(FWIW, the nurses I know would rather be honored by having the nursing shortage and mandatory overtime issues addressed than with goofy labels like &quot;Angels of Mercy.&quot;)</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2009:site.82596-2613757</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 13:01:15 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>chesty_a_arthur</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: FatherDagon</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/82596/Visual-history-of-nurse-uniforms#2613765</link>	
		<description>Wait, I thought &quot;Angels of Mercy&quot; were the &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Angel_of_Mercy_(serial_killer)&quot;&gt;BAD &lt;/a&gt;type of nurses.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2009:site.82596-2613765</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 13:06:29 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>FatherDagon</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: reflecked</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/82596/Visual-history-of-nurse-uniforms#2613779</link>	
		<description>Thank you for saying that, chesty_arthur.  

The uniforms have slowly evolved from nun&apos;s habits to institutionally supplied (and very clean) scrubs, and the profession has changed from &quot;succoring female&quot; to intensively educated and highly trained professionals of all genders. 

We still have traditional capping ceremonies for students. The men get lapel pins. The caps are know to be a disease vector now, and if a cap is worn, it&apos;s usually disposable and blue.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2009:site.82596-2613779</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 13:18:02 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>reflecked</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: Cranberry</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/82596/Visual-history-of-nurse-uniforms#2613902</link>	
		<description>Shouldn&apos;t there be a comment from It&apos;s Raining Florence Nightingale?</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2009:site.82596-2613902</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 14:43:16 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Cranberry</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: cobaltnine</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/82596/Visual-history-of-nurse-uniforms#2613996</link>	
		<description>That website gives me a slight bit of creepiness.   I only clicked on a few pages (because, seriously, &amp;gt; 400 pages of this?)  but I don&apos;t see a progression of history.  There&apos;s no representation of modern uniforms that aren&apos;t dresses.  No, not history.  Subtle, repressive fetishism.  Not that that&apos;s wrong, but to present it otherwise is kind of creepy. 

Within the hospital setting: Since most women don&apos;t wear skirts every day, especially while doing manual labor, having a uniform skirt is going to be awkward and weird and require a period of retaining how one lifts, bends, and dodges.  Couple that with patients who can be inappropriate, well, it&apos;s just not productive for most women to wear skirted uniforms.  Hell, I wear skirts in a non-patient area, but once I move onto a floor?  You bet I&apos;m in scrub pants.  My hospital is moving back towards a uniform color and cut of scrubs, rather than &apos;bring your own, doesn&apos;t matter the color or print.&apos;  I&apos;m happy to get the glurgy religious prints out, especially.  That&apos;s enough of a uniform for the major hospitals, and fetish guy can just chill out or find the one old lady who wears the scrub dress to go harass.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2009:site.82596-2613996</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 15:56:00 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cobaltnine</dc:creator>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
