But seriously, what is it with companies shucking their distinctive, well-known brands for bland new designs? The new logo screams "meh." Nothing interesting about it.I have a theory that it's considered best for corporate logos to be as bland as possible so that they can be re-branded, destroyed, and replaced quickly and easily as needs arise. Perhaps corporate managers figure that if too much is invested in a single logo that becomes too distinctive and identifiable, then it becomes too difficult to retool when the economic and cultural environment changes, or when you want to export that corporate identity elsewhere, into other countries or other niches.
« Older Just nae call i' English!... | Jobless College Graduate Sues ... Newer »
This thread has been archived and is closed to new comments
For my childhood.
posted by bookwo3107 at 11:26 AM on August 4 [1 favorite]