...[T]he Ministry of the Interior... reported that the ministry bought 800 of the devices from a company called ATSC (UK) Ltd. for $32 million in 2008, and an unspecified larger quantity for $53 million. [...O]fficials paid up to $60,000 apiece, when the wands could be purchased for as little as $18,500.... ATSC’s promotional material claims that its device can find guns, ammunition, drugs, truffles, human bodies and even contraband ivory at distances up to a kilometer, underground, through walls, underwater or even from airplanes three miles high. The device works on “electrostatic magnetic ion attraction,” ATSC says.... If there are explosives or drugs to the operator’s left, the wand is supposed to swivel to the operator’s left and point at them.But you can much more cheaply make your own wand that works identically, from a wire coathanger!
This post was deleted for the following reason: Maybe this can go in the other open post about the ADE 651 -- vacapinta
Proponents of the wand often argue that errors stem from the human operator, who they say must be rested, with a steady pulse and body temperature, before using the device.I don't see what the problem is. Seems perfectly scientific to me.
Then the operator must walk in place a few moments to “charge” the device, since it has no battery or other power source, and walk with the wand at right angles to the body. If there are explosives or drugs to the operator’s left, the wand is supposed to swivel to the operator’s left and point at them.
« Older "Every opportunity for peace in the Middle East ha... | "Maggwire.com... Newer »
This thread has been archived and is closed to new comments
posted by effugas at 10:50 PM on November 4