"The ROBOT (or mannequin) is an illusionary dance style [...] that attempts to imitate a dancing robot or mannequin."Can an actual robot imitate a robot? Can a robot present the illusion of being a robot? Or is a robot forever denied the ability to do the robot by virtue of actually being a robot?
"As long as the illusion of being a robot is maintained, it is considered the robot."
That should be cute/funny, but I find it strangely creepy...I'm not sure but I think the uncanny valley kind of – to extend the metaphor – fills up if you see lots of things that would fall into it. With all the CG and robots around these days I think it's having less of an effect. Either that, or people have just gotten better at not designing stuff that falls into it. I very rarely feel creeped out by CG or robots these days.
Wow, some of those movements carry it deep into the uncanny valley.
« Older “The relativity of simultaneity in modern physics ... | A beautiful ad for the New Zea... Newer »
This thread has been archived and is closed to new comments
posted by Huck500 at 10:14 AM on November 28, 2009