<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel> 

	<title>Comments on: Your favorite decade sucks</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/87346/Your-favorite-decade-sucks/</link>
	<description>Comments on MetaFilter post Your favorite decade sucks</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 12:12:43 -0800</pubDate>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 12:12:43 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>

	<item>
		<title>Your favorite decade sucks</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/87346/Your-favorite-decade-sucks</link>	
		<description>Rolling Stone&apos;s Top 100 &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.rollingstone.com/news/story/31248017/100_best_albums_of_the_decade/&quot;&gt;Albums&lt;/a&gt;/&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.rollingstone.com/news/story/31248926/100_best_songs_of_the_decade/&quot;&gt;Songs&lt;/a&gt; of the decade</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">post:www.metafilter.com,2009:site.87346</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 12:10:28 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brodiggitty</dc:creator>		<category>rollingstone</category>		<category>top100</category>		<category>songs</category>		<category>albums</category>		<category>list</category>		<category>lists</category>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: Dr-Baa</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/87346/Your-favorite-decade-sucks#2857654</link>	
		<description>&lt;em&gt;Page 1 of 44&lt;/em&gt;

-cough-</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2009:site.87346-2857654</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 12:12:43 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dr-Baa</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: jabberjaw</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/87346/Your-favorite-decade-sucks#2857658</link>	
		<description>For the non-clicky types, the full lists: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.rollingstone.com/news/story/31248017/100_best_albums_of_the_decade/44&quot;&gt;Albums&lt;/a&gt; / &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.rollingstone.com/news/story/31248926/100_best_songs_of_the_decade&quot;&gt;Songs&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2009:site.87346-2857658</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 12:13:09 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jabberjaw</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: The Card Cheat</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/87346/Your-favorite-decade-sucks#2857665</link>	
		<description>What, no &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.rollingstone.com/reviews/album/114714/review/5942832/goddessinthedoorway&quot;&gt;&lt;i&gt;Goddess In The Doorway&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/i&gt;?!?!?!? I can&apos;t believe Wenner didn&apos;t pull rank to have that shoehorned in.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2009:site.87346-2857665</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 12:15:42 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The Card Cheat</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: dortmunder</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/87346/Your-favorite-decade-sucks#2857678</link>	
		<description>The Hold Steady come in at 99 and the album they picked is Almost Killed Me? This list sucks.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2009:site.87346-2857678</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 12:19:48 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dortmunder</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: gman</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/87346/Your-favorite-decade-sucks#2857680</link>	
		<description>&lt;em&gt;Your favorite decade sucks&lt;/em&gt;

Totally. It doesn&apos;t even have a name we can agree on.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2009:site.87346-2857680</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 12:20:51 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>gman</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: dortmunder</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/87346/Your-favorite-decade-sucks#2857681</link>	
		<description>Also, conspicously absent are the Drive by Truckers, who put out several excellent albums in the past ten years.  Double suck.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2009:site.87346-2857681</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 12:21:32 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dortmunder</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: mpbx</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/87346/Your-favorite-decade-sucks#2857682</link>	
		<description>No.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2009:site.87346-2857682</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 12:22:12 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mpbx</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: cmgonzalez</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/87346/Your-favorite-decade-sucks#2857694</link>	
		<description>Jabberjaw&apos;s songs link is incorrect. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.rollingstone.com/news/story/31248926/100_best_songs_of_the_decade/27&quot;&gt;This&lt;/a&gt; is the full songs list.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2009:site.87346-2857694</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 12:27:10 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cmgonzalez</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: flarbuse</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/87346/Your-favorite-decade-sucks#2857695</link>	
		<description>I was looking at the song list, and I saw Mississippi by Bob Dylan pretty high up there.  Just above it was In Da Club by 50 Cent.  How is it that you even rank those two things against one another and determine that one is better?  

It would be like ranking a Nissan Sentra ahead of peanut butter, but behind denim jackets.

Also, I hate when people say that the movie wasn&apos;t as good as the book.

Really?  Was the poster better than the commercial?  Was the song better than the movie?</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2009:site.87346-2857695</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 12:27:52 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>flarbuse</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: cmgonzalez</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/87346/Your-favorite-decade-sucks#2857697</link>	
		<description>While the album listings are a &lt;em&gt;little &lt;/em&gt;better, this top songs list seems based more on earworm-ability than anything else. Hey Ya!? Poker Face? Milkshake?</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2009:site.87346-2857697</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 12:29:01 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cmgonzalez</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: muddgirl</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/87346/Your-favorite-decade-sucks#2857698</link>	
		<description>Well, I liked it slightly better than the NME list. So there&apos;s that.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2009:site.87346-2857698</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 12:29:36 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>muddgirl</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: KevinSkomsvold</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/87346/Your-favorite-decade-sucks#2857703</link>	
		<description>--------------------BEGIN COPY-------------------------
What, no ___________________ ? Everyone knows that ________________
was the greatest album of the century!
--------------------END COPY---------------------------</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2009:site.87346-2857703</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 12:31:11 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>KevinSkomsvold</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: gompa</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/87346/Your-favorite-decade-sucks#2857705</link>	
		<description>See, y&apos;all are making the mistake of reading this as a simple best-of list. It&apos;s not. It&apos;s a think piece about a mid-level decade struggling with its own limitations in the harsh face of stardom.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2009:site.87346-2857705</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 12:31:21 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>gompa</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: blucevalo</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/87346/Your-favorite-decade-sucks#2857709</link>	
		<description>Bob Dylan and White Stripes are 4 of the Top 20. Rolling Stone, you are so hidebound that you make dead Ed Sullivan look hip and with it.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2009:site.87346-2857709</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 12:32:10 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>blucevalo</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: jabberjaw</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/87346/Your-favorite-decade-sucks#2857710</link>	
		<description>&lt;em&gt;Jabberjaw&apos;s songs link is incorrect. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.rollingstone.com/news/story/31248926/100_best_songs_of_the_decade/27&quot;&gt;This&lt;/a&gt; is the full songs list.&lt;/em&gt;

Thanks.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2009:site.87346-2857710</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 12:32:17 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jabberjaw</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: uncleozzy</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/87346/Your-favorite-decade-sucks#2857711</link>	
		<description>&lt;i&gt;top songs list seems based more on earworm-ability than anything else&lt;/i&gt;

Isn&apos;t that kind of the point of pop music, though?  It&apos;s got a good beat and you can dance to it (and sing the hook after the first listen).</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2009:site.87346-2857711</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 12:32:24 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>uncleozzy</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: Infinite Jest</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/87346/Your-favorite-decade-sucks#2857713</link>	
		<description>The comments are great. People calling Rolling Stone out for being &lt;em&gt;too cutting edge&lt;/em&gt;...

&quot;I am so clearly out of touch with what Rolling Stone considers &quot;The Best&quot; it is daunting. The magazine that turned me on to the first Elton John, Crosby, Stills and Nash, Chicago Transit Authority, etc......has long been a facsimile of itself. &quot;

Honestly though, I kinda like those lists - the singles more than the albums. A bit safe, a bit too much Coldplay and U2, but better than I was expecting. 

(Or maybe I&apos;m just turning into RS&apos;s target audience.)</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2009:site.87346-2857713</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 12:33:12 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Infinite Jest</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: zsazsa</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/87346/Your-favorite-decade-sucks#2857717</link>	
		<description>Full links with commentary/listen links: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.rollingstone.com/news/story/31248017/100_best_albums_of_the_decade/print&quot;&gt;albums&lt;/a&gt; / &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.rollingstone.com/news/story/31248926/100_best_songs_of_the_decade/print&quot;&gt;songs&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2009:site.87346-2857717</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 12:35:02 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>zsazsa</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: Corduroy</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/87346/Your-favorite-decade-sucks#2857720</link>	
		<description>This tops my list of worst designed Top 100 lists.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2009:site.87346-2857720</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 12:37:53 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Corduroy</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: cmgonzalez</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/87346/Your-favorite-decade-sucks#2857723</link>	
		<description>&lt;em&gt;Isn&apos;t that kind of the point of pop music, though? It&apos;s got a good beat and you can dance to it (and sing the hook after the first listen).&lt;/em&gt;

One factor, but keep in mind that this list just says &quot;best songs&quot;. Can we dance to &quot;Everything in its Right Place&quot;, &quot;Yellow&quot;, &quot;Beautiful&quot; &quot;Maps&quot; &quot;Boulevard of Broken Dreams&quot;?  

Many people make the mistake that &quot;pop music&quot; is some kind of throwaway, when there are many songs that have some honest lyrics and can have a lot of meaning and also be in this amorphous category of &quot;pop music&quot;.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2009:site.87346-2857723</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 12:38:34 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cmgonzalez</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: cmgonzalez</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/87346/Your-favorite-decade-sucks#2857731</link>	
		<description>(Including all those songs I mentioned and more)</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2009:site.87346-2857731</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 12:39:54 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>cmgonzalez</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: wreckingball</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/87346/Your-favorite-decade-sucks#2857745</link>	
		<description>Before following the links or reading any of the commentary, my prediction was essentially, &quot;I&apos;m going to have to click a lot of things, and there aren&apos;t going to be any women artists included.&quot;

Okay.

So. There are single-page versions of the lists themselves. There are some 29 women or ensembles-fronted-by-women on the singles list, 15 women or ensembles-fronted-by-women on the albums list (seventeen if you want to include New Pornographers and Yo La Tengo. I didn&apos;t).

That&apos;s marginally better than I would have anticipated, and that&apos;s kind of pathetic, but it&apos;s Rolling Stone, so whatever.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2009:site.87346-2857745</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 12:44:58 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>wreckingball</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: Slarty Bartfast</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/87346/Your-favorite-decade-sucks#2857746</link>	
		<description>I agree with some of these and disagree with some of these!</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2009:site.87346-2857746</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 12:45:06 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Slarty Bartfast</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: scrowdid</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/87346/Your-favorite-decade-sucks#2857747</link>	
		<description>I don&apos;t understand why people keep rating &lt;em&gt;Yoshimi&lt;/em&gt; higher than &lt;em&gt;The Soft Bulletin&lt;/em&gt;.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2009:site.87346-2857747</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 12:45:11 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>scrowdid</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: Burhanistan</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/87346/Your-favorite-decade-sucks#2857752</link>	
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=30YW3wgRvyI&quot;&gt;Disagree&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2009:site.87346-2857752</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 12:47:11 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Burhanistan</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: punkfloyd</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/87346/Your-favorite-decade-sucks#2857757</link>	
		<description>Holy shit I&apos;m old.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2009:site.87346-2857757</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 12:48:49 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>punkfloyd</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: muddgirl</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/87346/Your-favorite-decade-sucks#2857760</link>	
		<description>&lt;i&gt;I don&apos;t understand why people keep rating Yoshimi higher than The Soft Bulletin.&lt;/i&gt;

It&apos;s sort of confusing to me, too, until I remembered that some people think Yoshimi is a better album than The Soft Bulletin. That&apos;s a pretty good reason for rating it higher.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2009:site.87346-2857760</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 12:49:41 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>muddgirl</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: Dee Xtrovert</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/87346/Your-favorite-decade-sucks#2857761</link>	
		<description>Snore.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2009:site.87346-2857761</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 12:49:51 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dee Xtrovert</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: Slap*Happy</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/87346/Your-favorite-decade-sucks#2857766</link>	
		<description>On the other hand, Johnny Cash&apos;s &quot;Hurt&quot; is right about where it should be, on anyone&apos;s list, except for maybe &quot;People Who Hate Johnny Cash On General Principle&quot;, but they don&apos;t really count, anyhow.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2009:site.87346-2857766</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 12:53:12 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Slap*Happy</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: uncleozzy</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/87346/Your-favorite-decade-sucks#2857768</link>	
		<description>(I should point out that I wasn&apos;t disparaging pop music.  I should also point out that I&apos;m only vaguely aware that songs have lyrics that are often more than just pleasant strings of syllables for the voice instrument.)</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2009:site.87346-2857768</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 12:53:40 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>uncleozzy</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: Infinite Jest</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/87346/Your-favorite-decade-sucks#2857772</link>	
		<description>&lt;em&gt;I don&apos;t understand why people keep rating Yoshimi higher than The Soft Bulletin.
&lt;/em&gt;

Soft Bulletin came out in 1999. Definitely a better album than Yoshimi, though (IMO).</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2009:site.87346-2857772</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 12:55:15 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Infinite Jest</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: jeffburdges</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/87346/Your-favorite-decade-sucks#2857777</link>	
		<description>The Rock n&apos; Roll Establishment, like Rolling Stones, RnRHoF, etc., are all well known for spurning whole genres that explicitly re-embrace any degree of classical music, ala &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heavy_metal_music&quot;&gt;metal&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Progressive_rock&quot;&gt;progressive rock&lt;/a&gt;, etc.  All while explicitly focusing upon silly criteria for being &quot;Rock&quot;, like earworm-ability, &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Punk_rock&quot;&gt;aesthetics&lt;/a&gt;, and songs that concern relationships.  So I&apos;d take any reviews, lists, etc. from explicitly &quot;Rock&quot; sources with considerable salt.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2009:site.87346-2857777</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 12:56:22 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jeffburdges</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: codacorolla</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/87346/Your-favorite-decade-sucks#2857779</link>	
		<description>Is This It, Stankonia, and The Blueprint seem to show up in the top five on most lists I&apos;ve seen so far.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2009:site.87346-2857779</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 12:56:29 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>codacorolla</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: jmd82</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/87346/Your-favorite-decade-sucks#2857785</link>	
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/86760/Is-this-it-named-album-of-the-decade&quot;&gt;Didn&apos;t we already go through this?&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2009:site.87346-2857785</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 13:00:35 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jmd82</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: kathrineg</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/87346/Your-favorite-decade-sucks#2857792</link>	
		<description>Man I love The Blueprint. I listen to it all the way through at least a couple of times a month. If you&apos;ve never done that, do it. I also like The Black Album. Surprisingly enough, the song that got my partner interested in Jay-Z was &quot;Death of Autotune&quot;, one of his more mediocre efforts. 

Pitchfork does this kind of thing better, I think. NPR&apos;s version was surprisingly enjoyable.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2009:site.87346-2857792</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 13:04:25 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>kathrineg</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: Wolfdog</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/87346/Your-favorite-decade-sucks#2857793</link>	
		<description>Guess what&apos;s not on my Top 100 Relevant Music Rags of the Decade list?</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2009:site.87346-2857793</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 13:05:49 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Wolfdog</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: kathrineg</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/87346/Your-favorite-decade-sucks#2857798</link>	
		<description>I have to say, their top ten and my top ten are identical, with the exception of Eminem (not my thing).</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2009:site.87346-2857798</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 13:06:59 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>kathrineg</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: jeffburdges</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/87346/Your-favorite-decade-sucks#2857802</link>	
		<description>I&apos;m quite pleasantly surprised they mentioned Sigur R&#243;s though!  :)</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2009:site.87346-2857802</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 13:09:21 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jeffburdges</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: eggplantplacebo</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/87346/Your-favorite-decade-sucks#2857804</link>	
		<description>Can we take a break from hating for a second and recognize how totally brilliant &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.rollingstone.com/issue1094-95&quot;&gt;Chip Kidd&apos;s cover&lt;/a&gt; for this issue is?


...


Okay, back to hating: U2 does not belong any &quot;best&quot; list that encompasses the last 20 years. If there was, like, a terrorist watch list for music, they could go on that.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2009:site.87346-2857804</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 13:10:25 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>eggplantplacebo</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: burnmp3s</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/87346/Your-favorite-decade-sucks#2857807</link>	
		<description>&lt;i&gt;There are some 29 women or ensembles-fronted-by-women on the singles list, 15 women or ensembles-fronted-by-women on the albums list (seventeen if you want to include New Pornographers and Yo La Tengo. I didn&apos;t).

That&apos;s marginally better than I would have anticipated, and that&apos;s kind of pathetic, but it&apos;s Rolling Stone, so whatever.&lt;/i&gt;

What&apos;s the percentage of artists in these genres are women or ensembles-fronted-by-women in the first place though?  I like female vocals more than I like male vocals, but my music collection has a pretty high percentage of male artists.  They covered most of the great albums by mainstream female acts I could think of (like Cat Power&apos;s and The Yeah Yeah Yeah&apos;s), and although they left out some of my personal favorites like Mirah, they also didn&apos;t include similar male artists like The Microphones/Mt Eerie.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2009:site.87346-2857807</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 13:12:11 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>burnmp3s</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: rokusan</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/87346/Your-favorite-decade-sucks#2857809</link>	
		<description>I prefer this to that other list that was kicking around here awhile back (Pitchfork?) maybe because it has more female singers and more old-people-compatible music for old-people like me. It&apos;s a bit light on the alt-folky side for me, and that&apos;s been a pretty big part of the 00&apos;s, but this is &lt;i&gt;Rolling Stone&lt;/i&gt;, I suppose.

Also, it&apos;s nifty that they include a list of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.rollingstone.com/news/story/31248926/100_best_songs_of_the_decade/26&quot;&gt;the voters&lt;/a&gt;. They even show some of the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.rollingstone.com/photos/gallery/31219787/the_best_music_of_the_decade_insi&quot;&gt;ballots.&lt;/a&gt;

No write-ins for the lizard people, as far as I can see.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2009:site.87346-2857809</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 13:13:52 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>rokusan</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: crinklebat</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/87346/Your-favorite-decade-sucks#2857810</link>	
		<description>This list really brought home to me exactly how many life changes I&apos;ve experienced in the last ten years. So many times looking at this list I found myself thinking &quot;There is NO WAY that song came out after 2000! I remember listening to that in sophomore year of high school - &quot; before realizing, yes, I was a sophomore in high school a decade ago. Yikes.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2009:site.87346-2857810</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 13:14:16 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>crinklebat</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: philip-random</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/87346/Your-favorite-decade-sucks#2857815</link>	
		<description>&lt;em&gt;I kinda like those lists - the singles more than the albums. &lt;/em&gt;

Blame filesharing, I guess.  But the 2000s will always be a singles decade for me.  I wonder if I even consciously listened to 100 albums from beginning to end over the past ten years.  I know I listened to more than 5,000 single different songs.  My itunes tells me so.

Okay list, I think.  Better than I suspected.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2009:site.87346-2857815</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 13:17:00 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>philip-random</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: octothorpe</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/87346/Your-favorite-decade-sucks#2857822</link>	
		<description>I like a lot of these and even own quite a few of them which I assume means that RS is as hopelessly out of touch as I am.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2009:site.87346-2857822</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 13:18:57 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>octothorpe</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: swift</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/87346/Your-favorite-decade-sucks#2857823</link>	
		<description>What, no Hella?</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2009:site.87346-2857823</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 13:19:33 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>swift</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: klangklangston</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/87346/Your-favorite-decade-sucks#2857825</link>	
		<description>Honestly, I&apos;m more interested in MeFi members top 10/top 100s, mostly because I know them. A solid B list from a C+ magazine doesn&apos;t really excite me.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2009:site.87346-2857825</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 13:19:38 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>klangklangston</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: Endure You Are Not Alone</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/87346/Your-favorite-decade-sucks#2857832</link>	
		<description>Highlights from the ballots: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.rollingstone.com/photos/gallery/31219787/the_best_music_of_the_decade_insi/photo/12&quot;&gt; Jarvis Cocker&lt;/a&gt; voted for &quot;Who Let the Dogs Out&quot; and only heard &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.rollingstone.com/photos/gallery/31219787/the_best_music_of_the_decade_insi/photo/11&quot;&gt;19 good albums&lt;/a&gt; this decade, and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.rollingstone.com/photos/gallery/31219787/the_best_music_of_the_decade_insi/photo/1&quot;&gt;Tom Morello&lt;/a&gt; votes for himself (#14).  Sadly they did not show Yoko Ono&apos;s ballot.  I was kinda curious.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2009:site.87346-2857832</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 13:22:40 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Endure You Are Not Alone</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: kathrineg</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/87346/Your-favorite-decade-sucks#2857839</link>	
		<description>Surprised that &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0GQjYPWDcmg&quot;&gt;&quot;Daydreamin&quot;&lt;/a&gt;&apos; by Lupe Fiasco didn&apos;t make it...and shocked to see Brad Paisley&apos;s &quot;Alcohol&quot;. What a banal example of pop-country. Even &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8vSNiQKAH0E&quot;&gt;Ticks&lt;/a&gt; or like 5 different Toby Keith songs are better than that (example, &quot;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TVRzk3VWOKY&quot;&gt;Who&apos;s Your Daddy&lt;/a&gt;&quot;).  Save a Horse, Ride a Cowboy. 5 or 6 songs by the Dixie Chicks (not just &quot;Ready to Make Nice&quot;). All better! BAH! HUMBUG!</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2009:site.87346-2857839</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 13:27:24 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>kathrineg</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: XQUZYPHYR</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/87346/Your-favorite-decade-sucks#2857843</link>	
		<description>&lt;em&gt;Okay, back to hating: U2 does not belong any &quot;best&quot; list that encompasses the last 20 years. If there was, like, a terrorist watch list for music, they could go on that.&lt;/em&gt;

All That You Can&apos;t Leave Behind was a great album and I expected to see it in the top 20.  No Line on the Horizon is fuckawful and being anywhere on the list is ridiculous.

Same thing with Magic and The Rising being so close to each other on the list.  Rank Springsteen anywhere you want in terms of general goodness but saying those two albums were remotely close to each other in quality?  WTF?</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2009:site.87346-2857843</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 13:32:00 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>XQUZYPHYR</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: Kattullus</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/87346/Your-favorite-decade-sucks#2857844</link>	
		<description>wreckingball: &lt;i&gt;15 women or ensembles-fronted-by-women on the albums list (seventeen if you want to include New Pornographers and Yo La Tengo. I didn&apos;t&lt;/i&gt;

Well, they do better than Pitchfork in that they have two solo female artists in the top 20 (Pitchfork had none) but the first band that is more than half female is Sleater-Kinney and both are at roughly the same place (Sleater-Kinney for both, #70 here and #72 on Pitchfork). NME also had only one female artist in the top 20 but it was the highest placed one, PJ Harvey at #6. On the other hand NME didn&apos;t have a single female majority band in the top 100. I find all that weird but then the stereotype of the music critic is young male so I suppose it&apos;s not too weird that young males like art by other young males.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2009:site.87346-2857844</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 13:32:27 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kattullus</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: fleacircus</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/87346/Your-favorite-decade-sucks#2857847</link>	
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;#9 &quot;Beautiful Day&quot;. U2. The song that re-established U2 as the world&apos;s biggest band looked backward, reviving the skyscraping sound of their Eighties classics. But the lyrics &#8212; &quot;See the canyons broken by cloud/See the tuna fleets clearing the sea out&quot; &#8212; were more ambivalent than the title suggested, a prayer for transcendence in a wounded world.&lt;/blockquote&gt;...</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2009:site.87346-2857847</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 13:33:22 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>fleacircus</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: ekroh</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/87346/Your-favorite-decade-sucks#2857850</link>	
		<description>&lt;em&gt;Okay, back to hating: U2 does not belong any &quot;best&quot; list that encompasses the last 20 years. If there was, like, a terrorist watch list for music, they could go on that.&lt;/em&gt;

Agreed. Rolling Stone seems to exist solely for the purpose of carrying the torch for U2 and Green Day. The nineties are over, guys.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2009:site.87346-2857850</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 13:36:01 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ekroh</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: Jaltcoh</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/87346/Your-favorite-decade-sucks#2857857</link>	
		<description>&lt;em&gt;Well, they do better than Pitchfork in that they have two solo female artists in the top 20 (Pitchfork had none) but the first band that is more than half female is Sleater-Kinney and both are at roughly the same place (Sleater-Kinney for both, #70 here and #72 on Pitchfork). NME also had only one female artist in the top 20 but it was the highest placed one, PJ Harvey at #6. On the other hand NME didn&apos;t have a single female majority band in the top 100. &lt;/em&gt;

If you want a 100-best-songs-of-the-decade list that&apos;s about 40% female, I posted mine in Projects a few days ago. Also, no U2.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2009:site.87346-2857857</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 13:40:58 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jaltcoh</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: Nabubrush</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/87346/Your-favorite-decade-sucks#2857859</link>	
		<description>Haterz in tha house!</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2009:site.87346-2857859</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 13:41:51 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nabubrush</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: The World Famous</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/87346/Your-favorite-decade-sucks#2857861</link>	
		<description>It&apos;s nice to see that, though the end of the decade means that I&apos;m precariously close to being in a protected class under the ADEA, I&apos;m still young enough to a) recognize the music listed in a Rolling Stone &quot;best of&quot; list and b) disagree with it for actual music reasons and not just because I don&apos;t &quot;get it.&quot;  Of course, maybe that&apos;s because I&apos;m turning irrelevant right along with RS.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2009:site.87346-2857861</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 13:42:42 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The World Famous</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: progosk</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/87346/Your-favorite-decade-sucks#2857862</link>	
		<description>(For the visually enclined: best &lt;a href=&quot;http://pitchfork.com/features/staff-lists/7695-the-top-50-music-videos-of-the-2000s/&quot;&gt;50&lt;/a&gt; or &lt;a href=&quot;http://videos.antville.org/stories/1940679/&quot;&gt;101&lt;/a&gt; of the decade&apos;s music videos.)</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2009:site.87346-2857862</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 13:42:51 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>progosk</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: The World Famous</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/87346/Your-favorite-decade-sucks#2857864</link>	
		<description>&lt;em&gt;NME also had only one female artist in the top 20 but it was the highest placed one, PJ Harvey at #6.&lt;/em&gt;

Hm.  Perhaps I&apos;m mistaken, but I think of PJ Harvey as the name of Polly Jean Harvey&apos;s band, which is mostly men.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2009:site.87346-2857864</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 13:44:51 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The World Famous</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: ODiV</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/87346/Your-favorite-decade-sucks#2857870</link>	
		<description>Aren&apos;t there a lot more male artists/bands/musicians releasing albums period, or is that evening out?</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2009:site.87346-2857870</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 13:46:37 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ODiV</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: Kattullus</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/87346/Your-favorite-decade-sucks#2857871</link>	
		<description>Jaltcoh: &lt;i&gt;If you want a 100-best-songs-of-the-decade list that&apos;s about 40% female, I posted mine in Projects a few days ago. Also, no U2.&lt;/i&gt;

Without looking at it too closely my impression of the songs lists was that they had a much more reasonable distribution between male and female. I like your list, jaltcoh, and especially that you explained your criteria at the outset.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2009:site.87346-2857871</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 13:47:19 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kattullus</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: ekroh</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/87346/Your-favorite-decade-sucks#2857875</link>	
		<description>&lt;em&gt;Well, they do better than Pitchfork in that they have two solo female artists in the top 20 (Pitchfork had none)&lt;/em&gt;

Can Pitchfork help it if there are no good female solo artists?

Joking, of course. My girlfriend gives me a lot of shit for not having more females in my music collection (she says Bjork doesn&apos;t count), and I don&apos;t really have a good response. It seems like musical preferences would be a gender-neutral thing, but I listen almost exclusively to male artists.

I&apos;ve often wondered whether women have a hard time relating to men singing about other women (or whatever), but the women I&apos;ve asked assure me this is not the case.

And when I do like a female artist or a band with female vocals (jj, the xx), it doesn&apos;t seem that I&apos;m responding to the female-ness, just the good music-ness. So I can&apos;t account for it.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2009:site.87346-2857875</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 13:49:15 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ekroh</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: Kattullus</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/87346/Your-favorite-decade-sucks#2857883</link>	
		<description>ekroh: &lt;i&gt;she says Bjork doesn&apos;t count&lt;/i&gt;

&lt;i&gt;o&lt;/i&gt;&lt;u&gt; &lt;/u&gt;&lt;b&gt;O&lt;/b&gt;</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2009:site.87346-2857883</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 13:53:28 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kattullus</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: hijinx</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/87346/Your-favorite-decade-sucks#2857886</link>	
		<description>There &lt;em&gt;is&lt;/em&gt; a top 100 list of top 100 lists, isn&apos;t there? I need to know if Rolling Stone&apos;s opinion matters more than those of NME, Pitchfork, or AV Club.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2009:site.87346-2857886</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 13:55:32 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>hijinx</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: dortmunder</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/87346/Your-favorite-decade-sucks#2857889</link>	
		<description>&lt;em&gt;ekroh: she says Bjork doesn&apos;t count

o O&lt;/em&gt;

Bjork is a space alien of indeterminate gender, so she does not count.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2009:site.87346-2857889</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 13:57:33 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dortmunder</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: muddgirl</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/87346/Your-favorite-decade-sucks#2857891</link>	
		<description>I&apos;m always sort of surprised when I hear men say that they don&apos;t listen to a lot of music with female vocalists. My spouse used to be that way, but it seriously only takes a few seconds to find tons and tons of great music produced or performed by women. It&apos;s sort of a self-fulfilling prophesy, actually.

Nowadays, I tent to skim through the album reviews in RS or Spin magazine and specifically look for the 2 or 3 reviews of woman-led indie-rock or dance-rock bands.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2009:site.87346-2857891</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 13:57:59 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>muddgirl</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: Sys Rq</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/87346/Your-favorite-decade-sucks#2857892</link>	
		<description>&lt;em&gt;(Or maybe I&apos;m just turning into RS&apos;s target audience.)&lt;/em&gt;

Please don&apos;t make me link to the&lt;em&gt; Family Matters&lt;/em&gt; opening again.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2009:site.87346-2857892</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 13:59:09 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sys Rq</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: muddgirl</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/87346/Your-favorite-decade-sucks#2857895</link>	
		<description>Also, for my spouse and I it started with blended groups like The New Pornographers, which have two amazing woman vocalists who share lead vocals as well as harmonies.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2009:site.87346-2857895</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 13:59:46 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>muddgirl</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: dw</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/87346/Your-favorite-decade-sucks#2857907</link>	
		<description>&lt;em&gt;Agreed. Rolling Stone seems to exist solely for the purpose of carrying the torch for &lt;strike&gt;U2 and Green Day&lt;/strike&gt;Bob Dylan and the Rolling Stones. The &lt;strike&gt;nineties&lt;/strike&gt;sixties are over, guys.&lt;/em&gt;

Same as it ever was.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2009:site.87346-2857907</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 14:03:45 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dw</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: JHarris</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/87346/Your-favorite-decade-sucks#2857908</link>	
		<description>Now now, Rolling Stone keeps Matt Taibbi in print.

They talk about music too?  Can&apos;t say I&apos;ve noticed.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2009:site.87346-2857908</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 14:04:06 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>JHarris</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: Kattullus</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/87346/Your-favorite-decade-sucks#2857910</link>	
		<description>Alex Petridis has a pretty interesting &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2009/dec/06/review-of-the-decade-pop&quot;&gt;Review of the Decade&lt;/a&gt; in The Guardian. His main point is that, really, not much changed, popmusicwise, in the 00s.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2009:site.87346-2857910</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 14:05:44 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kattullus</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: Artw</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/87346/Your-favorite-decade-sucks#2857918</link>	
		<description>&lt;i&gt;&quot;People Who Hate Johnny Cash On General Principle&quot;&lt;/i&gt;

Who are these people?</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2009:site.87346-2857918</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 14:09:37 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Artw</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: philip-random</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/87346/Your-favorite-decade-sucks#2857920</link>	
		<description>&lt;em&gt;Can Pitchfork help it if there are no good female solo artists?&lt;/em&gt;

Fact is, as far as modern POPular music goes, the boys have been at it a lot longer than the girls (that is, more culturally enabled, less culturally restricted, probably way more driven and desperate to be heard).  But things are definitely changing.  I haven&apos;t done the metrics on my own collections and favorites (nor do I care to) but I&apos;m pretty damned sure there&apos;s WAY MORE female artists represented now (to the 300-400 percent level) than there would&apos;ve been ten or twenty years ago.

Slow revolutions are always the most effective ones.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2009:site.87346-2857920</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 14:10:57 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>philip-random</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: dw</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/87346/Your-favorite-decade-sucks#2857927</link>	
		<description>I do commend Rolling Stone for not listing a bunch of Songs The Kids In Williamsburg Danced To In 2007 (aka most of the Pitchfork list), but five Coldplay songs? Just a bit excessive.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2009:site.87346-2857927</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 14:14:49 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dw</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: Artw</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/87346/Your-favorite-decade-sucks#2857940</link>	
		<description>Currently we have a subscription to Rolling Stone because some dude came to the door* and guilted my wife into buying a magazine subscription, and the list was mainly things we had no interest in and it seemed like RS might kind of, sort of be interesting bathroom reading. 

It&apos;s a very puzzling magazine, as I&apos;ve mentioned elsewhere they mainly seem to exist to promote U2, but I really can&apos;t figure out who it is aimed at asides from that &#8211; people in their 40s still trying to be cool maybe? It&apos;s all so very alien to me. 

Still, the lists not entirely bad. Actually TBH I&apos;m surprised I recognize as much of it as I do. Also they give some heavy props to the Yeah Yeah Yeahs and Maps in particular, and that&apos;s my favourite song of the moment, so good on them for that.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2009:site.87346-2857940</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 14:20:43 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Artw</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: four panels</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/87346/Your-favorite-decade-sucks#2857947</link>	
		<description>&lt;em&gt;Albums of the Decade

1 | Radiohead: Kid A&lt;/em&gt;

Yep.

&lt;em&gt;2 | The Strokes: Is This It&lt;/em&gt;

Nope.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2009:site.87346-2857947</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 14:21:47 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>four panels</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: Artw</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/87346/Your-favorite-decade-sucks#2857948</link>	
		<description>Also MIA appears to exist so people who make lists can say &quot;well that&apos;s Electronica and people who do not fit into the American binary race dialogue sorted&quot;.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2009:site.87346-2857948</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 14:22:12 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Artw</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: jfuller</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/87346/Your-favorite-decade-sucks#2857950</link>	
		<description>&amp;gt; My girlfriend gives me a lot of shit for not having more females in my music collection (she says Bjork doesn&apos;t count)

If you split bands-fronted-by-Autotune out into its own gender category the male-female ratio improves.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2009:site.87346-2857950</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 14:23:09 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jfuller</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: jokeefe</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/87346/Your-favorite-decade-sucks#2857953</link>	
		<description>&lt;small&gt;&lt;i&gt;Can we dance to &quot;Everything in its Right Place&quot;?&lt;/i&gt;

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hok1-6lwSJE&quot;&gt;And how!&lt;/a&gt; Note: crowd shot video, nsf the easily nauseated&lt;/small&gt;</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2009:site.87346-2857953</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 14:24:44 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jokeefe</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: Artw</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/87346/Your-favorite-decade-sucks#2857954</link>	
		<description>&lt;small&gt;* Really not sure to what degree the whole door-to-door subscriptions/charity thing is a scam. Should probably AskMe on that sometime&lt;/small&gt;</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2009:site.87346-2857954</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 14:25:25 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Artw</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: four panels</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/87346/Your-favorite-decade-sucks#2857960</link>	
		<description>still all dylan, all the time I see, which is strange because he&apos;s totally irrelevant.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2009:site.87346-2857960</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 14:29:52 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>four panels</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: tkchrist</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/87346/Your-favorite-decade-sucks#2857963</link>	
		<description>&lt;em&gt;
&quot;People Who Hate Johnny Cash On General Principle&quot;

Who are these people?&lt;/em&gt;

People whose planet earth citizenship is immediately hereby revoked.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2009:site.87346-2857963</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 14:30:39 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>tkchrist</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: Artw</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/87346/Your-favorite-decade-sucks#2857964</link>	
		<description>He does a very strange Tom Waits impersonation for everything these days.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2009:site.87346-2857964</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 14:31:18 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Artw</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: 0xFCAF</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/87346/Your-favorite-decade-sucks#2857969</link>	
		<description>I defy anyone to explain to me how &lt;i&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fYCzDhaRV60&quot;&gt;This Year&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/i&gt; is not a better song than &lt;i&gt;Viva la Vida&lt;/i&gt;. The Top 100 songs list is some kind of unholy fusion of Actually Great Songs and Middling Bog-standard Crap.

&lt;i&gt;Last Nite&lt;/i&gt;? &lt;i&gt;Mr. Brightside&lt;/i&gt;? &lt;i&gt;Use Somebody&lt;/i&gt;? These are songs I would put on the Top 10 most normal and unnotable songs of the decade, not greatest. They should have gotten honest with themselves and made two top 50s: one list of songs of actual musical  accomplishment, and one list of songs that made us feel like they might have been written 20 years ago when we were on the high school football team and popular.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2009:site.87346-2857969</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 14:34:08 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>0xFCAF</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: ekroh</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/87346/Your-favorite-decade-sucks#2857970</link>	
		<description>&lt;em&gt;Songs The Kids In Williamsburg Danced To In 2007 (aka most of the Pitchfork list)&lt;/em&gt;

You&apos;ve got it backward. The kids in Williamsburg danced to them because Pitchfork liked them.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2009:site.87346-2857970</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 14:34:20 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ekroh</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: jokeefe</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/87346/Your-favorite-decade-sucks#2857975</link>	
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Perhaps I&apos;m mistaken, but I think of PJ Harvey as the name of Polly Jean Harvey&apos;s band, which is mostly men.&lt;/i&gt;

You are mistaken. She writes the entirety of the music. 

I dislike a great deal the convention that Bjork is some sort of crazy alien. She&apos;s not insane, she&apos;s a female musician and performer; if she&apos;s nuts, where does that leave Wayne Coyne?

The list of Best of the Decade may be lighter on female artists (ho tend to have a heavier presence in Best Singles rather than albums) but 2009 certainly isn&apos;t: St. Vincent and motherf*cking TuneYards and Julianna Barwick and Rodgrigo and Gabriela and The xx and Michachu and Dirty Projectors are all on my list. 

Also: GRAR GRAR U2 GRAR GRAR THE STROKES GRAR GRAR GRAR

And: Rolling Stone, whatever, meh.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2009:site.87346-2857975</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 14:36:21 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jokeefe</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: You Should See the Other Guy</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/87346/Your-favorite-decade-sucks#2857978</link>	
		<description>&lt;i&gt; still all dylan, all the time I see, which is strange because he&apos;s totally irrelevant&lt;/i&gt;

Dylan&apos;s rejects on the bootleg series are better than 90% of every other working band&apos;s A-titles. 

Relevance? Dude, your favorite album of the decade is the same one chosen by a rag that&apos;s most recent cover article was about Taylor Lautner. Thanks for the laughs.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2009:site.87346-2857978</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 14:38:00 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>You Should See the Other Guy</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: The World Famous</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/87346/Your-favorite-decade-sucks#2857980</link>	
		<description>&lt;em&gt;Perhaps I&apos;m mistaken, but I think of PJ Harvey as the name of Polly Jean Harvey&apos;s band, which is mostly men.

You are mistaken. She writes the entirety of the music. &lt;/em&gt;

&quot;She&quot; meaning Polly Jean Harvey, who is the lead singer and songwriter of a band called PJ Harvey.  And PJ Harvey is a band consisting mostly of men but fronted by a woman named Polly Jean Harvey.

&lt;em&gt;if she&apos;s nuts, where does that leave Wayne Coyne?&lt;/em&gt;

I don&apos;t have firsthand knowledge of this, but I&apos;m pretty sure Wayne Coyne is a dude.

&lt;em&gt;And: Rolling Stone, whatever, meh.&lt;/em&gt;

Amen.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2009:site.87346-2857980</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 14:39:23 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The World Famous</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: Artw</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/87346/Your-favorite-decade-sucks#2857983</link>	
		<description>PJ Harvey is a band consisting mostly of men in roughly the same way that The White Stripes are a band consisting mostly of session musicians not named Jack or Meg White.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2009:site.87346-2857983</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 14:41:40 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Artw</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: Joey Michaels</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/87346/Your-favorite-decade-sucks#2857987</link>	
		<description>It&apos;s uncanny.  This is like the fifth and sixth top 100 of the &apos;00&apos;s list where I not only agree with every single song and album choice, but would have ranked them at exactly the same spot.  I haven&apos;t even heard of some of these songs and I&apos;d have still ranked them exactly the same.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2009:site.87346-2857987</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 14:42:42 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Joey Michaels</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: Artw</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/87346/Your-favorite-decade-sucks#2857995</link>	
		<description>You&apos;re doing it wrong.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2009:site.87346-2857995</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 14:45:36 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Artw</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: Artw</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/87346/Your-favorite-decade-sucks#2858001</link>	
		<description>BTW, I would totally recommend checking out the works of &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Parish&quot;&gt;John Parish&lt;/a&gt;, who collaborates with PJ Harvey on some-but-not-all of her projects.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2009:site.87346-2858001</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 14:47:11 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Artw</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: muddgirl</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/87346/Your-favorite-decade-sucks#2858002</link>	
		<description>&lt;i&gt;I don&apos;t have firsthand knowledge of this, but I&apos;m pretty sure Wayne Coyne is a dude.&lt;/i&gt;

A bit obtuse today? I&apos;m 100% sure that jokeefe&apos;s meaning was something along these lines: If we throw out Bjork as &quot;a great female performer&quot; because she&apos;s sort of crazy, then we have to throw out Wayne Coyne as &quot;a great male performer&quot; because he is also sort of crazy. Impeccable logic.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2009:site.87346-2858002</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 14:47:50 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>muddgirl</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: The World Famous</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/87346/Your-favorite-decade-sucks#2858005</link>	
		<description>It was a joke, muddgirl.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2009:site.87346-2858005</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 14:49:29 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The World Famous</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: muddgirl</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/87346/Your-favorite-decade-sucks#2858008</link>	
		<description>Yes, which is... um... why I pre-emptively called myself a bit obtuse? Or something? :)</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2009:site.87346-2858008</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 14:51:07 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>muddgirl</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: Artw</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/87346/Your-favorite-decade-sucks#2858014</link>	
		<description>/sets up boombox, plays U2, heals the thread.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2009:site.87346-2858014</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 14:52:26 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Artw</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: ekroh</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/87346/Your-favorite-decade-sucks#2858018</link>	
		<description>&lt;em&gt;/sets up boombox, plays U2, heals the thread.&lt;/em&gt;

But their early stuff, right? I only like their early stuff.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2009:site.87346-2858018</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 14:54:46 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ekroh</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: The World Famous</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/87346/Your-favorite-decade-sucks#2858019</link>	
		<description>U2, of course, being a woman who is a little-known member of a band called &quot;Yough Tiiu,&quot; which is comprised primarily of robots.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2009:site.87346-2858019</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 14:55:10 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The World Famous</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: Artw</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/87346/Your-favorite-decade-sucks#2858022</link>	
		<description>Only their later stuff has the power to heal the world. I&apos;m sorry, it&apos;s a sacrifice your ears will have to make. 

/turns up volume.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2009:site.87346-2858022</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 14:57:03 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Artw</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: Jaltcoh</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/87346/Your-favorite-decade-sucks#2858024</link>	
		<description>Thanks, Kattullus</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2009:site.87346-2858024</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 14:57:44 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jaltcoh</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: xmutex</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/87346/Your-favorite-decade-sucks#2858029</link>	
		<description>&lt;em&gt;&quot;She&quot; meaning Polly Jean Harvey, who is the lead singer and songwriter of a band called PJ Harvey. And PJ Harvey is a band consisting mostly of men but fronted by a woman named Polly Jean Harvey.&lt;/em&gt;

What the fuck is this? PJ Harvey is the woman named Polly Jean Harvey. What&apos;s this crap about her band?</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2009:site.87346-2858029</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 15:00:14 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>xmutex</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: jokeefe</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/87346/Your-favorite-decade-sucks#2858031</link>	
		<description>&lt;i&gt;&quot;She&quot; meaning Polly Jean Harvey, who is the lead singer and songwriter of a band called PJ Harvey. And PJ Harvey is a band consisting mostly of men but fronted by a woman named Polly Jean Harvey.&lt;/i&gt;

I don&apos;t mean to belabour this, but when Polly Harvey performs as a solo artist, she still uses the name PJ Harvey. The band name and her name are the same. She doesn&apos;t record with a band called PJ Harvey, and then do solo work as Polly Harvey. [/belaboured]</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2009:site.87346-2858031</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 15:00:51 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jokeefe</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: Artw</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/87346/Your-favorite-decade-sucks#2858036</link>	
		<description>Oh well, fuck you later era U2, turns out you are useless for anything. 

/kicks over boombox. 

(IIRC U2 were also amongst the panelists who decided the lists. Somehow I have a very hard time imagining them voting for anyone other than U2. )</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2009:site.87346-2858036</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 15:05:02 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Artw</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: Artw</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/87346/Your-favorite-decade-sucks#2858038</link>	
		<description>Lars Ulrich of Metallica also gives a big up to U2s latest album. Um, fuck you Metallica. Go get a time machine and travel back in time so the band you used to be can kick your asses.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2009:site.87346-2858038</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 15:06:31 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Artw</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: dw</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/87346/Your-favorite-decade-sucks#2858039</link>	
		<description>&lt;em&gt;The kids in Williamsburg danced to them because Pitchfork liked them.&lt;/em&gt;

But Pitchfork liked them because the kids in Williamsburg danced to them.

And yes, there&apos;s only one way to explain this contradiction -- Pitchfork is entirely written by the kids in Williamsburg&apos;s parents&apos; servants.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2009:site.87346-2858039</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 15:06:33 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dw</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: quin</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/87346/Your-favorite-decade-sucks#2858047</link>	
		<description>&lt;em&gt;Also MIA appears to exist so people who make lists can say &quot;well that&apos;s Electronica and people who do not fit into the American binary race dialogue sorted&quot;.&lt;/em&gt;

One thing I love about MIA&apos;s work is that when I make a playlist, she fits perfectly between something like Slipknot and the Black Keys. 

But then, I believe that listening to music in my car should be the psychological equivalent of trying to shoot a minigun at a dragon that is having sex with a pickup truck; Confusing, exciting, terrifying, and just a little bet sexy.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2009:site.87346-2858047</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 15:10:17 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>quin</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: The World Famous</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/87346/Your-favorite-decade-sucks#2858050</link>	
		<description>&lt;em&gt;She doesn&apos;t record with a band called PJ Harvey, and then do solo work as Polly Harvey. [/belaboured]&lt;/em&gt;

Actually, sometimes she does solo work as Polly Jean Harvey (or has in the past).  The band was originally a 3-piece that was expressly called, as a band, PJ Harvey.  Then the band broke up and she did solo work variously as either PJ Harvey or as &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/B000001E9Y/metafilter-20/ref=nosim/&quot;&gt;Polly Jean Harvey&lt;/a&gt;.  It&apos;s sort of like the situation with Alice Cooper, but complicated by the fact that the original band and the singer&apos;s actual name were very similar. [/even more belaboured]

The really important thing, though, is that &lt;em&gt;Stories From The City, Stories From The Sea &lt;/em&gt;belongs somewhere in the top 5, and not clear down in the 30s.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2009:site.87346-2858050</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 15:13:13 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The World Famous</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: FelliniBlank</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/87346/Your-favorite-decade-sucks#2858053</link>	
		<description>&lt;em&gt;&quot;People Who Hate Johnny Cash On General Principle&quot;

Who are these people?&lt;/em&gt;

I don&apos;t know, but that is one fucked-up general principle.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2009:site.87346-2858053</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 15:15:33 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>FelliniBlank</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: Artw</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/87346/Your-favorite-decade-sucks#2858057</link>	
		<description>I think they need to be put on that pickup truck that&apos;s being shot at with the minigun and humped by a dragon, on general principle.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2009:site.87346-2858057</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 15:17:44 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Artw</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: jokeefe</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/87346/Your-favorite-decade-sucks#2858062</link>	
		<description>Let&apos;s just agree that the most important part of PJ Harvey the band is PJ Harvey the person. 

And then further agree about Stories From the City, Stories From the Sea. What a fine piece of work that album is.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2009:site.87346-2858062</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 15:20:46 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jokeefe</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: ZsigE</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/87346/Your-favorite-decade-sucks#2858073</link>	
		<description>Seems like this is more a list of songs/albums that define the decade, not necessarily the best ones. I mean, Madonna&apos;s &quot;Hung Up&quot;? Sure, it&apos;s catchy, but I&apos;d never call it a great song. What I &lt;em&gt;would&lt;/em&gt; say is that it is very much a song of the 00&apos;s, and one that will be remembered as such. (I&apos;ll certainly remember it, if only for that day a few years ago when I was doing Christmas shopping and &lt;em&gt;every single shop&lt;/em&gt; I went into was playing it. Having Madonna follow you round all day is more than a little disturbing.)

The only truly bizarre part of the list, so far as I can see, is that although they&apos;ve included a lot of Springsteen they&apos;ve unaccountably missed out his &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/We_Shall_Overcome:_The_Seeger_Sessions&quot;&gt;Seeger Sessions&lt;/a&gt;, which is one of the best albums I own.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2009:site.87346-2858073</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 15:28:45 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ZsigE</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: The World Famous</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/87346/Your-favorite-decade-sucks#2858074</link>	
		<description>Absolutely.

(Though I refuse to allow U2 to take credit for our agreement.  Obama, and not Bono, is the one who created this peace between us.)</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2009:site.87346-2858074</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 15:28:48 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The World Famous</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: Artw</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/87346/Your-favorite-decade-sucks#2858080</link>	
		<description>It&apos;s okay, after I kicked the Boombox over I extracted the U2 iPod from it and crushed it under my heal.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2009:site.87346-2858080</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 15:32:01 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Artw</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: klausness</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/87346/Your-favorite-decade-sucks#2858109</link>	
		<description>And so the healing has begun...</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2009:site.87346-2858109</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 15:41:40 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>klausness</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: Artw</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/87346/Your-favorite-decade-sucks#2858113</link>	
		<description>HEEL THE WORLD.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2009:site.87346-2858113</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 15:42:34 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Artw</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: idiopath</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/87346/Your-favorite-decade-sucks#2858233</link>	
		<description>Top 10 ways to troll in the 2000s

&lt;ol&gt;
&lt;li&gt;9-11 changed everything.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;liberal media&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;inside job&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;why do you hate america?&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;IMMA GONNA LET YOU FINISH BUT&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;LOLMUSLIMS&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Intelligent Design&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Wake up SHEEPLE&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;the &quot;fail&quot; meme&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Make a top &lt;em&gt;X&lt;/em&gt; list.&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ol&gt;</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2009:site.87346-2858233</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 16:33:28 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>idiopath</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: idiopath</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/87346/Your-favorite-decade-sucks#2858236</link>	
		<description>&lt;small&gt;&lt;small&gt;damn put all the work into setting value= for each li to make a count down list and mefi strips the formatting&lt;/small&gt;&lt;/small&gt;</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2009:site.87346-2858236</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 16:34:36 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>idiopath</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: ciderwoman</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/87346/Your-favorite-decade-sucks#2858263</link>	
		<description>Well apart from the why-does-no-one-else-agree-with-me element of these lsist, I thought the one interesting thing was that the Streets original Pirate Material was number 97 for Rolling Stone, but number 1 with the Observer Music Monthly (the music mag with the Observer, in the UK for all you USAians), which I think is about right. It&apos;s an album of huge importance in the UK, but I guess it means very little elsewhere.

(and before all the &apos;what do you mean huge importance I h8 it&apos; type posts - you don&apos;t have to like it but a huge amount of what came after was informed by that album, and not just in music)</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2009:site.87346-2858263</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 16:50:15 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ciderwoman</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: Artw</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/87346/Your-favorite-decade-sucks#2858276</link>	
		<description>Pff. They&apos;re  basically a less fun Goldy looking Chain.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2009:site.87346-2858276</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 16:54:15 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Artw</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: ciderwoman</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/87346/Your-favorite-decade-sucks#2858301</link>	
		<description>I loved GLC (I had to interview them once and they made me laugh all afternoon) but that streets album did a) give a voice to a section of youth sub culture that had been pretty quiet until then and b) influenced an awful lot of music that came after it. All of a sudden in the UK rap was more British than American, and it was more confessional. Like I said, you may not like the album (and I&apos;m not a huge fan) but you can still see how everything that came after it knew it had happened.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2009:site.87346-2858301</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 17:04:47 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ciderwoman</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: The World Famous</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/87346/Your-favorite-decade-sucks#2858324</link>	
		<description>&lt;em&gt;It&apos;s an album of huge importance in the UK&lt;/em&gt;

I&apos;m curious.  What&apos;s important about it?</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2009:site.87346-2858324</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 17:16:21 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The World Famous</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: jokeefe</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/87346/Your-favorite-decade-sucks#2858343</link>	
		<description>I&apos;&apos;ll take a go at this-- because it articulated a new kind of voice in British music; both working class and one which had completely assimilated American rap and created something new and, most importantly, recognizably English. (I&apos;m only British by decent, so tell me if I&apos;m doing this wrong.)</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2009:site.87346-2858343</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 17:28:00 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jokeefe</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: jokeefe</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/87346/Your-favorite-decade-sucks#2858346</link>	
		<description>Urgh. &quot;descent&quot;.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2009:site.87346-2858346</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 17:28:22 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jokeefe</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: The World Famous</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/87346/Your-favorite-decade-sucks#2858362</link>	
		<description>Cool.  Thanks.  I like the album quite a bit more than recent U.S. rap, and I think the English-ness of it is one of the reasons for that.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2009:site.87346-2858362</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 17:33:55 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The World Famous</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: stavrosthewonderchicken</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/87346/Your-favorite-decade-sucks#2858389</link>	
		<description>&lt;em&gt;&quot;See the canyons broken by cloud/See the tuna fleets clearing the sea out&quot;&lt;/em&gt;

Jesus spelunking christ, bono can&apos;t write lyrics to save his life anymore, can he? &lt;small&gt;I suppose it could argued that he never could, but the first 4 or 5 albums had some good stuff, I thought, back in the day.&lt;/small&gt;</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2009:site.87346-2858389</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 17:44:27 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>stavrosthewonderchicken</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: you&apos;re a kitty!</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/87346/Your-favorite-decade-sucks#2858393</link>	
		<description>Any best album list without Blind Pilot&apos;s &quot;3 Rounds and a Sound&quot; is wrong.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2009:site.87346-2858393</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 17:45:52 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>you&apos;re a kitty!</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: Sys Rq</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/87346/Your-favorite-decade-sucks#2858409</link>	
		<description>&lt;em&gt;Jesus spelunking christ, bono can&apos;t write lyrics to save his life anymore, can he?&lt;/em&gt;

&quot;I can&apos;t live/With or without you&quot;

If only.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2009:site.87346-2858409</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 17:57:28 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sys Rq</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: porn in the woods</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/87346/Your-favorite-decade-sucks#2858442</link>	
		<description>Original Pirate Material is awesome. Too bad the last two Streets albums are garbage.

&lt;em&gt;It&apos;s not a wholesale operation - It&apos;s just some 1/8ths and some Playstations&lt;/em&gt; is a &lt;small&gt;GREAT&lt;/small&gt; line.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2009:site.87346-2858442</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 18:12:14 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>porn in the woods</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: Kattullus</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/87346/Your-favorite-decade-sucks#2858470</link>	
		<description>Those first two Streets albums were so damn great I don&apos;t really care that he&apos;s been drifting aimlessly since.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2009:site.87346-2858470</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 18:37:47 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kattullus</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: klangklangston</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/87346/Your-favorite-decade-sucks#2858582</link>	
		<description>Quick browse of my iTunes for albums that should be on the list but aren&apos;t (Control-F for Fail):

Aaliyah&#8212;s/t
Annie&#8212;Anniemal
Deerhoof&#8212;Apple O
The Quails&#8212;Atmosphere
Comets on Fire&#8212;Avatar
Racc-oo-oon&#8212;Behold Secret Kingdom
Black Mountain&#8212;s/t
Jay Reatard&#8212;Blood Visions
Boris&#8212;Feedbacker
Working for a Nuclear Free City&#8212;Businessmen and Ghosts
Fucked Up&#8212;Chemistry of Common Life
Cannibal Ox&#8212;Cold Vein
Missy Elliot&#8212;Cookbook
High on Fire&#8212;Death is this Communion
TV on the Radio&#8212;Desperate Youth, Bloodthirsty Babes (far better than their later stuff)
James Kolchaka Superstar&#8212;Don&apos;t Trust Whitey
Ghostface Killah&#8212;Fishscale
A-Frames&#8212;S/t
Indian Jewelry&#8212;Free Gold!
Fiery Furnaces&#8212;Gallowsbird&apos;s Bark
Nomo&#8212;Ghost Rock
Rihanna&#8212;Good Girl Gone Bad
Exploding Hearts&#8212;Guitar Romantic
Hercules and Love Affair&#8212;s/t
Andrew WK&#8212;I Get Wet
Black Mountain&#8212;In The Future
Indian Jewelry&#8212;Invasive Exotics
Nomo&#8212;Invisible Cities
Asa-Chang and Jun Rae&#8212;Jun Ray Song Chang
Mastodon&#8212;Leviathan
Goon Moon&#8212;Licker&apos;s Last Leg
The OhSees&#8212;The Master&apos;s Bedroom is Worth Spending the Night In
McLusky&#8212;McLusky Do Dallas
Vampire Hands&#8212;Me and You Cherry Red
Deerhoof&#8212;Milk Man
Cylob&#8212;Mood Bells
Jeans Team&#8212;Musik Von Oben
No Age&#8212;Nouns
Deadly Snakes&#8212;Ode To Joy
Paris Hilton&#8212;Paris (just kidding. Paying attention?)
Om&#8212;Pilgrimage
Rogers Sisters&#8212;Purely Evil
Jurassic 5&#8212;Quality Control
Otis Taylor&#8212;Recapturing the Banjo
Adult.&#8212;Resuscitation
Robyn&#8212;s/t
Viva L&apos;American Death Set&#8212;Sangre Libre
M83&#8212;Saturdays=Youth
Of Montreal&#8212;Skeletal Lamping
Boris&#8212;Smile
The Long Blondes&#8212;Someone To Drive You Home
El Guapo&#8212;Super/System
Ghostface Killah&#8212;Supreme Clientele
The Breeders&#8212;Title TK
Need New Body&#8212;UFO
UGK&#8212;Underground Kingz
Vivian Girls&#8212;s/t
Studio&#8212;West Coast
Wooden Shjips&#8212;s/t

And that&apos;s ignoring the several Ann Arbor records that I always rep for (because they&apos;re spectacular) but leave off because they&apos;re hard to find and not many folks heard them the first time. But since we&apos;re sharing: 

&lt;i&gt;The Rants&#8212;Get Back Into It&lt;/i&gt;
Twitchy power pop between Feelies and Elvis Costello

&lt;i&gt;The Waxwings&#8212;Shadows of the Waxwings&lt;/i&gt;
Shimmering psych harmonies between Byrds and Spiritualized.

&lt;i&gt;The High Strung&#8212;Moxie Bravo&lt;/i&gt;
Cheap Trick&apos;s &quot;Southern Girls&quot; as modus operandi.

&lt;i&gt;The Avatars&#8212;Never a Good Time&lt;/i&gt;
Great girl pop like Rezillos, X-Ray Specs or Blondie&apos;s first albums filtered through Detroit punch.

&lt;i&gt;Saturday Looks Good To Me&#8212;All Your Summer Songs&lt;/i&gt;
Wall of Sound girl pop plus indie sensibilities make for gorgeous music.

&lt;i&gt;Dabenport&#8212;s/t&lt;/i&gt;
Boy-girl country with super-warm production, the whole album&apos;s like a hug. 

&lt;i&gt;Tribe of Zoe&#8212;Fall from Grace&lt;/i&gt;
Fine Young Cannibals falsetto with minimal dub background.

&lt;i&gt;Tim Monger&#8212;Summer Cherry Ghosts&lt;/i&gt;
Absolutely beautiful pop suite about lower Michigan.

&lt;i&gt;Great Lakes Myth Society&#8212;s/t&lt;/i&gt;
If the Pogues sailed the Great Lakes. 

Seriously, every one of those albums is better than Is This It.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2009:site.87346-2858582</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 20:09:28 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>klangklangston</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: Kattullus</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/87346/Your-favorite-decade-sucks#2858599</link>	
		<description>Oh yeah, Dabenport is the shit. Thanks for turning me on to them.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2009:site.87346-2858599</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 20:27:54 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kattullus</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: klangklangston</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/87346/Your-favorite-decade-sucks#2858621</link>	
		<description>I wanted to find a link to buy their album, but the best I can do is &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.myspace.com/dabenport&quot;&gt;their myspace page&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2009:site.87346-2858621</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 20:52:06 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>klangklangston</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: klangklangston</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/87346/Your-favorite-decade-sucks#2858623</link>	
		<description>It&apos;s what I listen to when I&apos;m alone in airports.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2009:site.87346-2858623</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 20:52:46 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>klangklangston</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: Kattullus</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/87346/Your-favorite-decade-sucks#2858636</link>	
		<description>Did you ever see &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.myspace.com/darvocets&quot;&gt;The Darvocets&lt;/a&gt;? They&apos;re a band I&apos;m somewhat fascinated by. They were an Ohio band but I think they had some sort of Lansing connection. They wrote music almost exclusively about aliens, i.e. Roswell, abductions etc.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2009:site.87346-2858636</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 21:15:36 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kattullus</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: fshgrl</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/87346/Your-favorite-decade-sucks#2858728</link>	
		<description>This list makes me really glad the decade is over.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2009:site.87346-2858728</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 22:16:10 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>fshgrl</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: Brocktoon</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/87346/Your-favorite-decade-sucks#2859146</link>	
		<description>No A Perferct Circle. gtfo with your Strokes. What crap.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2009:site.87346-2859146</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 08:17:18 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brocktoon</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: juiceCake</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/87346/Your-favorite-decade-sucks#2859150</link>	
		<description>Albums of the Decade

1 | Radiohead: Kid A

Nope.

2 | The Strokes: Is This It

Yep.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2009:site.87346-2859150</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 08:18:02 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>juiceCake</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: Brocktoon</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/87346/Your-favorite-decade-sucks#2859156</link>	
		<description>And I&apos;d go right back to the 90s if had to rely on Rolling Stone to tell me what to listen to.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2009:site.87346-2859156</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 08:18:56 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Brocktoon</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: juiceCake</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/87346/Your-favorite-decade-sucks#2859162</link>	
		<description>Interesting to see what other musicians, pop/commercial or otherwise select. A bit surprised it is so mainstream but perhaps they had to choose from a list RS gave them (I obviously didn&apos;t dig deep to find that out).

In the end it&apos;s all very subjective of course and doesn&apos;t offend me at all since my sensibilities are my own.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2009:site.87346-2859162</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 08:20:48 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>juiceCake</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: philip-random</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/87346/Your-favorite-decade-sucks#2859418</link>	
		<description>&lt;em&gt;And I&apos;d go right back to the 90s if had to rely on Rolling Stone to tell me what to listen to.&lt;/em&gt;

Make that the 70s and you might be on to something.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2009:site.87346-2859418</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 09:55:44 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>philip-random</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: saysthis</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/87346/Your-favorite-decade-sucks#2860369</link>	
		<description>&lt;em&gt;Tim Monger&#8212;Summer Cherry Ghosts
Absolutely beautiful pop suite about lower Michigan.
&lt;/em&gt;

Why are there so many pop suites about Michigan.

Also, there&apos;s no My Bloody Valentine or Paper Chase on this list.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2009:site.87346-2860369</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 17:36:55 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>saysthis</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: saysthis</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/87346/Your-favorite-decade-sucks#2860370</link>	
		<description>And &quot;Float On&quot; is #39?  Eat me.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2009:site.87346-2860370</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 17:37:27 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>saysthis</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: klangklangston</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/87346/Your-favorite-decade-sucks#2860458</link>	
		<description>&quot;&lt;i&gt;Why are there so many pop suites about Michigan.&lt;/i&gt;&quot;

Nostalgia for industrial glory? Anyway, it&apos;s better than Sufjan&apos;s&#8212;the only beef is that while it&apos;s like 11 songs, the whole thing is only about 35 minutes. It&apos;s Van Dyke Parks music at Guided By Voices pacing.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2009:site.87346-2860458</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 18:50:17 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>klangklangston</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: Kattullus</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/87346/Your-favorite-decade-sucks#2880583</link>	
		<description>This year The Guardian&apos;s Bob Stanley &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.guardian.co.uk/music/2009/dec/17/noughties-number-one&quot;&gt;listened to every UK #1 song of the decade&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2009:site.87346-2880583</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Dec 2009 02:02:12 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kattullus</dc:creator>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
