What is up with the Reader using a nude model with a headline that implies she's Peggy Williams? It's even worse in print as the picture is on the cover and the model credit is on a different page. Why not go with a picture of the real Peggy? Were the editors wishing she had shown more skin?
It strikes me as thematically tone deaf considering the article. [...]
"Entertainment for men."
University of Chicago Library's copy: Some issues mutilated and lacking pages.
« Older Announcing: The Art of Akira Exhibit... | As mentioned previously, two p... Newer »
This thread has been archived and is closed to new comments
Buy a Shirt