It's surprising how little the US Army actually tries to analyze the people they're shooting. posted by GuyZero at 11:01 AM on February 26, 2010
It's surprising how little the US Army actually tries to analyze the people they're shooting.
The problem is that actual intelligence is counterproductive to pork barrel military industrial complex profits. Getting people trained to do things the smart, cheap way, doesn't offer as much profit as a new experimental uber-machine, which will take billions to research, billions to build, and billions to maintain.
So, we get lots of neat toys, and shitty Intel. So we do things the hard way.
Then, we can invest billions into medical technology!
Everyone wins!
(Except the people getting shot. Our folks we sent over to do the shooting. Our tax payers. But man, the investors are happy. And that's what matters.) posted by yeloson at 11:44 AM on February 26, 2010
One of my favourite conspiracy theories is that it was the Kurdish peshmerga that found him, and they tipped off the US in exchange for a free hand in Kirkuk. posted by YouRebelScum at 12:26 PM on February 26, 2010
Good old-fashioned snitching is called "social networking" now? posted by Skeptic at 11:44 AM on February 27, 2010
« Older Actor Andrew J. Koenig was found dead in Vancouver... | The Google/China hacking case,... Newer »
This thread has been archived and is closed to new comments
Too easy?
posted by LordSludge at 8:58 AM on February 26, 2010 [1 favorite]