(c) Nothing in this act shall be construed to require:
(2) An employer to accommodate the ingestion of marihuana in any workplace or any employee working while under the influence of marihuana.
I have yet to hear a reasonable, and well-thought out argument to explain *why* having a Wal-Mart in a city is a good thing.
« Older On February 3, 2010, Autechre celebrated the month... | A new report from the Climate ... Newer »
This thread has been archived and is closed to new comments
Buy a Shirt