WEBE WEB Corp.
7020 s.w 22nd court Suite D
Davie, Fl 33317
They also all have subscriptions that allegedly bill through the same entity.posted by rcade at 9:43 AM on July 16, 2001
Still, on a gut level... I've resisted visisting the sites linked, but did click on some of the discussion links such as jcterminal's link to that daign.com site, and well, this is pretty creepy stuff. Perfectly legal, probably, and not much we should be able to do about that- 'tis a slippery slope indeed. But man... the parents are simply whacked if they aren't even half as revulsed as I am by this stuff... ugh!posted by hincandenza at 2:36 PM on July 16, 2001
Here's what bothers me about pix like these, or even the "glamour shots" that people have done during their weekend trip to the mall: would you want your wife, mother, or sister to pose in this manner? Further, even if she did, would you want her to post them for the world to see?
If your answer is no, then why the heck do you think it is OK to condone such pix, or ogle them? And why on earth would you find a woman like that desirable (as far as friendship, dating, marriage, etc)? Females who do this are nothing more than what I once heard termed "inflatable party girls." And, yes, this applies to males too, although it occurs less frequently on that side.
Combined with his previously espoused views on how downright degenerate a person would have to be to even consider a chemically altered state of conscious as an acceptable part of the vast spectacle of life, I once again remembered that the attitude epitomized by davidmsc is one of the most frightening things to me. Hey, I no more condone child porno than you do, but jayzus ka-rist davidmsc! While it may not be your "bag" to do glamour shots with wives or girlfriends, "pursuit of happiness" is a purely personal journey; without the investment of personal choice and free will "pursuit of happiness" becomes an empty, meaningless exercise. And I REALLY resent stick-up-the-butt prudes moralizing about what the rest of us should consider as acceptable ways to "pursue happiness".
You know, I'm not aware of how my sister enjoys her sex life, but for all I know she loves anal gangbangs and bukakke- and if that were the case, I wouldn't think less of her- she's a big girl and entitled to pursue her own happiness in life, whatever that may entail for her. And I don't like to contemplate my mom & dad having sex, but if they built an S&M room in the basement once all us kids left home and enjoyed wife-swapping swinger parties, that would be their choice, and a happy one at that. Your claim to be a libertarian rings hollow to me, since the tone you use in "wife, mother, or sister" is SO condescending- as if mere women couldn't possibly be sexual creatures, or that anyone who is sexually adventurous- adventurous compared to you, that is- must be a degraded filthy excuse for a human being. It smacks of the kind of patronizing, paternalistic attitude of Victorian sexual mores... fawkin' a, that sh*t pisses me off!!! Grrrr... >:(posted by hincandenza at 4:34 PM on July 16, 2001
Therefore, there's nothing we can do about the pedophiles themselves.
I'd explain where you're wrong, son, but it's getting late and it just wouldn't do any good anyway- you're not receptive to it. Just... just... go read your Ayn Rand. She has all the answers...posted by hincandenza at 11:13 PM on July 16, 2001
« Older Liberals Now Target Media... | Something... Newer »
This thread has been archived and is closed to new comments
Buy a Shirt