<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel> 

	<title>Comments on: Comments on 9052</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/9052//</link>
	<description>Comments on MetaFilter post Comments on 9052</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jul 2001 19:04:23 -0800</pubDate>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Jul 2001 19:04:23 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>

	<item>
		<title>Post number 9052</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/9052/</link>	
		<description>&lt;a href="http://news.cnet.com/news/0-1005-200-6583340.html?tag=mn_hd"&gt;Companies Encouraged to Mine Your Email Messages for Marketing Information.&lt;/a&gt; DoubleClick redux only now with e-mail? &quot;Companies should be adding code&quot; to your HTML-based e-mail messages, recommends an analyst from Jupiter, in order to track what products you&apos;re recommending to your friends and lovers.  You may have missed this one due to CNET&apos;s marketing-happy headline.  P.S.  Here&apos;s the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.jmm.com/xp/jmm/press/2001/pr_071601a.xml&quot;&gt;original press release from Jupiter&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">post:www.metafilter.com,2001:site.9052</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jul 2001 18:34:06 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>leo</dc:creator>		<category>email</category>		<category>emailmining</category>		<category>marketinformation</category>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: rebeccablood</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/9052/#109121</link>	
		<description>well, that&apos;s just evil. and another reason to turn off html email.

&quot;...only 7 percent of companies, according to Jupiter, can accurately identify &quot;viral influencers.&quot;&quot;

so, if they track me and identify me as a viral influencer, what do I get? coupons? 

ice cream? 

a pony?</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2001:site.9052-109121</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jul 2001 19:04:23 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>rebeccablood</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: kindall</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/9052/#109122</link>	
		<description>&lt;I&gt;if they track me and identify me as a viral influencer, what do I get?&lt;/I&gt;

More advertising!</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2001:site.9052-109122</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jul 2001 19:07:21 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>kindall</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: leo</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/9052/#109134</link>	
		<description>Not only that.  We should weigh the consequences of NOT being identified as a viral influencer -- I mean, will they just chuck out our mail?

On a more serious note, if marketing is fair game why not what people are doing tonight or who they&apos;re meeting?  How about their tastes in other things?  I bet someone could make a buck analyzing that.

It&apos;s the absence of any sense of reflection that maybe this isn&apos;t the greatest idea in the world that struck me the most.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2001:site.9052-109134</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jul 2001 19:27:01 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>leo</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: fooljay</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/9052/#109142</link>	
		<description>The funny thing is, all they can tell is that the advertised company/product is being talked about.  I could be sending it around to 100 friends saying that the product sucks and they&apos;d send me a pony because I&apos;m a &quot;viral influencer&quot;...

Marketers are Idiots...</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2001:site.9052-109142</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jul 2001 19:55:13 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>fooljay</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: buddha9090</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/9052/#109163</link>	
		<description>Speaking of marketing nastiness, I just read &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nytimes.com/2001/07/15/magazine/15PHENOMENON.html&quot;&gt;this article&lt;/a&gt; [NY Times] discussing a Manhattan marketing agencies new tactic of sending out twenty something hipsters to bars to rave loudly about a certain corporate sponsors product [in this article&apos;s case its a brand of flavored water].  Absolutely disgusting...</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2001:site.9052-109163</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jul 2001 21:02:15 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>buddha9090</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: zempf</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/9052/#109169</link>	
		<description>&lt;i&gt;if they track me and identify me as a viral influencer, what do I get?&lt;/i&gt;

Antibiotics.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2001:site.9052-109169</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jul 2001 21:32:17 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>zempf</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: whatnotever</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/9052/#109174</link>	
		<description>That would be just like them...  Giving antibiotics for a viral influence...</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2001:site.9052-109174</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jul 2001 22:00:23 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>whatnotever</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: davehat</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/9052/#109178</link>	
		<description>&lt;i&gt;so, if they track me and identify me as a viral influencer, what do I get? coupons? &lt;/i&gt;

Mouldy spam?</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2001:site.9052-109178</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jul 2001 22:17:16 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>davehat</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: Mars Saxman</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/9052/#109357</link>	
		<description>Right, because we all litter our email to friends with references to specific brand-names. Uh-huh.

I wish Outlook let you turn off HTML rendering as well as composition. Maybe it&apos;s time to write a procmail script to filter it out at the server...

-Mars</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2001:site.9052-109357</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2001 09:37:50 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mars Saxman</dc:creator>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
