It furthermore occurred to me that, basically, anarchy is in fact the only political position that is actually possible. I believe that all other political states are in fact variations or outgrowths of a basic state of anarchy; after all, when you mention the idea of anarchy to most people they will tell you what a bad idea it is because the biggest gang would just take over. Which is pretty much how I see contemporary society. We live in a badly developed anarchist situation in which the biggest gang has taken over and have declared that it is not an anarchist situation—that it is a capitalist or a communist situation. But I tend to think that anarchy is the most natural form of politics for a human being to actually practice. All it means, the word, is no leaders. An-archon. No leaders.I think you either haven't read TAZ or didn't internalize it. It's about creating spaces orthogonal to states, not supplanting them; as Bey points out on page one of the TAZ essay, revolutions turn very quickly into new states. If you replace the state with anarchy, you get more states.
- alan moore.
« Older Just a bit late for Canadian Mental Health Week, l... | On September 24 1983, a brilli... Newer »
This thread has been archived and is closed to new comments
posted by pompomtom at 7:00 AM on May 16, 2010