The point here is that we have a significant segment of the population that is no longer able to answer the question "What do you think/believe/feel/judge?" by saying what it is they really actually think or believe or feel or judge. Their response to any question is to calculate what that question means in terms of the zero-sum game and then to offer the answer they think will be strategically best for scoring points in that game.
This is a fundamentally disingenuous way of talking, voting and living and it's not possible to approach all those things disingenuously without that dishonesty and duplicity coming to shape, stunt and distort one's own thinking.
Perhaps I can school Panera Bread in Obamanomics, then:
First off we will send everyone on food stamps, welfare, medicaid, and any other 'benefit recieving Saint Louis resident to the Saint Louis Bread Company Cares Cafe (Panera's 'fair share' location).
Then we will line them up all the way down the street and make sure that they haven't eaten for at least a day.
Whereby they will rush the Saint Louis Bread Company Cares Cafe upon opening and eat every morsel in sight, (obesity demands, after all!)
From here they will fill out their 'fair share' quotient slip as ∅ and list 'Obama' as the final recipient of any undue cost.
Then after this has run course and many business debt obligations are taken out and foreclosed upon, Obama will bail out a business worth∅ and 'O' will be praised as 'compassionate' with 'his stash.'
Sounds like a good business model to me, how about you?
Saint Louis Bread Company Cares Cafe is then bailed out into perpetuity but America goes bankrupt.
« Older Randy Cohen, the New York Times's Ethicist, happil... | Jay Rosen thinks that "Sunday ... Newer »
This thread has been archived and is closed to new comments
Buy a Shirt