The issue is that when I first became a boy scout, I was invlolved, my dad always went on campouts with me, it was our time together. Then he started being forced to leave for the week from Monday at 4:00 am, to Friday 8:00 pm. I only get to see him on weekends, and if I went on campouts, he wouldn’t be able to go and I would only get to see him for half of a day every week.posted by boo_radley at 4:51 PM on June 14, 2010 [1 favorite]
It's called the Army. The main difference is that instead of your parents forcing you to stay, it's stoploss orders and prosecution of deserters.Ahem...Baden Powell himself disagreed with that very much.
At Oregon the Socialists came to the meeting which I held for Scouts and schoolboys and protested against our making boys into soldiers. They seemed to think that Scouts were armed with rifles and were learning military drill and playing at being soldiers, and they said they would not allow any boys to become Scouts.--Baden Powell, quoted here.
So I explained to them what scouting really was, that it is to make boys into good backwoodsmen and life-savers, and not into soldiers.
The boys themselves did not like the idea of being prevented from enjoying the fun of camp life and scouting, and they crowded round me after the meeting more than they had done anywhere before, asking how they could become Scouts.
I wonder if someone has made a scouting program for adults. Not for adults who are taking care of kids, just for adults.When I began working from home three years ago and knowing that I would go completely insane for want of human interaction, I found myself asking this exact same question, and after considerable poking around online I wound up joining the Masons. Freemasonry lacks the camping/outdoorsy aspect, but it pushes a lot of the other buttons that Scouting did... ritual ceremonies, strong morals, and fellowship. (And yes: critics are quick to point out that like Scouting, Freemasonry in its mainstream forms is male-only and requires a vague belief in a supreme being. While there's no official institutional homophobia that I'm aware of, I'm sure it can unfortunately be found in some places.)
"At issue is not whether the Cradle of Liberty Council can discriminate. A landmark 5-4 U.S. Supreme Court decision in 2000 said the Boy Scouts is a 'membership organization' and can exclude gay youths and troop leaders. But Philadelphia's City Charter says otherwise, and after years of negotiations the city decided in 2006 that the Cradle Council's refusal to explicitly reject the national scout policy violated the local rules. So the scouts were ordered to vacate the 80-year-old headquarters they had occupied rent-free, or else pay $200,000 a year to lease the building from the Fairmount Park Commission. It is one of two offices operated by the council, which runs scout troops in the city and Delaware and Montgomery Counties. The scouts contend the city's move is an unconstitutional 'coercion' that violates the organization's rights to free speech and equal protection. The city leases land to other institutions with membership rules, including a Catholic church, and those groups do not face eviction, the scouts say. The city says the comparison is inaccurate. A jury will decide, and both sides are sparring over how to screen the jury pool."posted by ericb at 9:55 AM on June 15, 2010 [1 favorite]
« Older An investigation into the startling fraud accusati... | Artist Henning Lederer has ada... Newer »
This thread has been archived and is closed to new comments
posted by TooFewShoes at 4:26 PM on June 14, 2010 [5 favorites]