<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel> 

	<title>Comments on: Comments on 935</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/935//</link>
	<description>Comments on MetaFilter post Comments on 935</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 08 Mar 2000 16:10:30 -0800</pubDate>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Mar 2000 16:10:30 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>

	<item>
		<title>Post number 935</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/935/</link>	
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.mediainfo.com/ephome/news/newshtm/stop/st030800.htm"&gt;The Corporatization of Weblogs Has Begun, it is decreed&lt;/a&gt; The current &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.mediainfo.com/ephome/news/newshtm/stop/st030800.htm&quot;&gt;Editor &amp; Publisher&lt;/a&gt; introduces blogging to its newspaper-editor audience and points out two blogs actually written by newspaper columnists. I do indeed agree that Weblogging is a viable new medium of expression for dead-tree media, and agree even more strongly that special-interest journalistic blogs are in desperate need. (I&apos;m planning one myself, and wouldn&apos;t it be great to read dueling blogs on the same topic from rival newspapers?) I just worry that the column will have an &lt;cite&gt;illocutionary effect&lt;/cite&gt;, i.e., it will cause something to happen just by uttering words, rather like &quot;I now pronounce you married.&quot; In this case the words I worry about are &quot;The corporatization of Weblogs has begun.&quot; I can hear Rushkoff griping about the good old days already. And I&apos;d gripe along with him.</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">post:www.metafilter.com,2000:site.935</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Mar 2000 15:03:39 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>joeclark</dc:creator>		<category>brokenlink</category>		<category>EditorAndPublisher</category>		<category>blogging</category>		<category>blog</category>		<category>blogs</category>		<category>journalism</category>		<category>corporate</category>		<category>newspapers</category>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: sylloge</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/935/#1601</link>	
		<description>And then I found &lt;a href=&quot;http://slate.msn.com/netelection/entries/00-03-07_76905.asp&quot; title=&quot;An article in Slate by an author who discusses weblogs, but apparently doesn&apos;t know the term.&quot;&gt;this&lt;/a&gt;, on the very same day.&lt;p&gt;And my one-time employer is launching several corp-blogs all at once (including &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.makeup.com/&quot;&gt;makeup.com&lt;/a&gt;.
&lt;p&gt;Do I smell a meme-storm brewing?</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2000:site.935-1601</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Mar 2000 16:10:30 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sylloge</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: CrazyUncleJoe</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/935/#1604</link>	
		<description>BLOGWATCH 2000!</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2000:site.935-1604</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Mar 2000 17:12:56 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>CrazyUncleJoe</dc:creator>
	</item>	<item>
		<title>By: wendell</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/935/#1619</link>	
		<description>Speaking of a meme-storm, maybe we could talk the Weather Service into naming next year&apos;s hurricanes after webloggers:  Hurricane Anil, Hurricane Brad, Hurricane Cam, Hurricane Dan (don&apos;t ask which one), Hurricane Eaton, Tropical Depression Foop...</description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">comment:www.metafilter.com,2000:site.935-1619</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Mar 2000 20:33:36 -0800</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>wendell</dc:creator>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
