Under any civilized system of law, an individual accused of murder has the right to be heard and to present evidence in his defense. But when an entire nation is accused of murder on a mass scale, claims that are wildly fantastic, mutually contradictory, and defy common sense and often physical possibility are allowed to stand unchallenged, truth is openly declared to be irrelevant, no evidence for defense is admitted, and even defense attorneys for the accused can be charged and imprisoned as being guilty of the same offense. Need it be said that truth does not need this kind of protection?
« Older Digg co-founder and CEO Kevin Rose has been sick w... | Tarkovsky films. All of them. ... Newer »
This thread has been archived and is closed to new comments
Buy a Shirt