"We know from literature that the human occupation of this region ended about 5,000 years ago, with the onset of hyperarid conditions. Therefore we think that the impact occurred afterwards."Considering this was a relatively small impact, it wouldn't be the kind of thing to be seen far and wide (I'm guessing). Since the area has been extremely dry for so long, I don't think there's much reason to travel in that area, so it may well have not been seen by anyone. Then again, even if it was seen and the viewing was recorded, I don't think this current research team has focused on pinpointing the age (yet), but instead have been documenting the site itself.
« Older I maintain that only an encyclopedic-archaeologica... | THEY ARE ON A TEAM.... Newer »
This thread has been archived and is closed to new comments
posted by Danf at 1:05 PM on July 26, 2010