Let me state here a personal conviction that appears, right now, to be profoundly unfashionable; which is that a planned economy can be more productive - and more morally desirable - than one left to market forces. The market is a good example of evolution in action; the try-everything-and-see-what-works approach. This might provide a perfectly morally satisfactory resource-management system so long as there was absolutely no question of any sentient creature ever being treated purely as one of those resources. The market, for all its (profoundly inelegant) complexities, remains a crude and essentially blind system, and is - without the sort of drastic amendments liable to cripple the economic efficacy which is its greatest claimed asset - intrinsically incapable of distinguishing between simple non-use of matter resulting from processal superfluity and the acute, prolonged and wide-spread suffering of conscious beings.Bonus: A new Culture novel, Surface Detail, is due in October 2010.
Banks himself appears to be in two minds about the plausibility of the Culture. In interviews, he has said explicitly that the Culture would not work for humans in our current state. In a Spike magazine interview he has said:posted by TheophileEscargot at 1:50 PM on August 15, 2010 [1 favorite]"It [the Culture] doesn't exist and I don't delude myself that it does. It's just my take on it. I'm not convinced that humanity is capable of becoming the Culture because I think people in the Culture are just too nice - altering their genetic inheritance to make themselves relatively sane and rational and not the genocidal, murdering bastards that we seem to be half the time."In a Scrawl interview he has said:"Is the Culture a possible future..." Iain mused, "Probably, eventually, but not for us. It will be the future for another species perhaps, different from us as we are today. We're too tied up in bigotry, hatred, war, economics, oppression, competition... The Culture would only work with people who are nicer than us - less prone to violence and genocide. Perhaps aggression is necessary to achieve sentience, consciousness, space travel, and we don't know if we're a particularly violent species or a relatively mild one compared to others out there..."
Contact and SC operatives worry about what they are doing, but they never (or hardly ever) worry about the good intentions of the Culture. Here is the crux: Banks is a very politically conscious writer, but he has created a social world in which, because of the energy grid and the Minds, the nineteenth century dream of replacing the government of men by the administration of things has been realised; there are no longer political choices to be made. The Friend-Enemy distinction is no longer meaningful, the free-rider problem has been solved (in a way, everyone is a free-rider) and tough decisions about the allocation of resources have disappeared ... Even the transactions costs of anarchy have disappeared; the Minds can run unbelievably complex habitats with a fraction of their powers. The Minds can make mistakes, as the Chelgrians can testify, but they can’t make political mistakes because they aren’t making political decisions in the first place; what one might call, adapting Hume, the ‘circumstances of politics’, that is, moderate scarcity and unreliable benevolence, simply do not exist.Also, here's another short piece of Banks exposition: A few Notes on Marain (Marain being the AI-designed language of The Culture)
Also while I'd been away, the ship had sent a request on a postcard to the BBC's World Service, asking for 'Mr David Bowie's "Space Oddity" for the good ship Arbitrary and all who sail in her.' (This from a machine that could have swamped Earth's entire electro-magnetic spectrum with whatever the hell it wanted from somewhere beyond Betelgeuse.) It didn't get the request played. The ship thought this was hilarious.posted by memebake at 3:35 PM on August 15, 2010
In Peter F. Hamilton's Night's Dawn trilogy, there is exactly one bisexual: the satanic cult member/anti-Christ/messiah of the coming apocalypse, Quinn Dexter, whose sexual depravity is constantly shown as being one of the most important facets of his character. He murders, tortures, rapes and mind rapes almost everyone he comes across and opens millions to possession by the spirits of the dead. In the third book we finally meet the person who turned him into who he is now... a depraved hermaphrodite. There may be one or two gay characters in the novels, but none of them stick out in this editor's mind...This is completely unacceptable in modern fiction. I put the book down as soon as I realized what Hamilton was doing and have never read anything that he has written since. I can look past that kind of characterization in older literature, but not a book written in the 90s.
My favorite Culture novel may be Matter ...At which point it became obvious to me that there is no one agreed-upon ordering of quality for Banks' novels. To wit:
Probably my favorite Banks novel overall, though, is Against a Dark Background...
« Older How are heatwaves in Russia and flooding in Pakist... | WAFF-TV reported the story of ... Newer »
This thread has been archived and is closed to new comments
posted by griphus at 12:05 PM on August 15, 2010 [4 favorites]