these portraits look back at us and embody a louder voice in the discourse of the gaze
November 4, 2010 7:26 PM   Subscribe

100 Portraits — 100 Photographers
posted by andoatnp (5 comments total) 17 users marked this as a favorite

 
Bookmarked. This is a very important and fascinating piece and my eyes will spend a lot of time with it this weekend.

Probably the best answer to the question that was answered so well so long ago that it sounds stupid now: Is photography Art?
posted by kozad at 7:47 PM on November 4, 2010


Is photography Art?

Photography's interesting because, you know, it's a new form, and a set of aesthetic criteria have not emerged yet.
posted by Threeway Handshake at 7:54 PM on November 4, 2010


10,000,000 Portraits -- 10,000,000 Photographers?
posted by j03 at 9:16 PM on November 4, 2010


There are some pretty badass portraits in there. The effect of seeing them in such concentration is intoxicating. Could easily spend all night with this. Thank you.
posted by Scientist at 10:36 PM on November 4, 2010 [1 favorite]


Photography's interesting because, you know, it's a new form, and a set of aesthetic criteria have not emerged yet.

Threeway Handshake, maybe you mean "as compared to painting, which is approximately 40,000 years old", but photography has been with us for 160 years or so now. Not really "new".

And, I'd say: aesthetic criteria have definitely emerged. Same thing for the newer art form of movies, a mere 100 years old.
posted by IAmBroom at 6:30 PM on November 5, 2010


« Older There's never been a better time to be a curious c...  |  Bread people. It's people. In... Newer »


This thread has been archived and is closed to new comments