Displaying comments 1 to 50 of 1797
MeTa post:
I HATE YOU ALL (EXCEPT OBAMA)
I think at a certain date unknown to the rest of us, mathowie should delete all the accounts with the MOST comments.
uh oh
posted to MetaTalk by caddis
at 6:11 PM on July 24, 2008
MeTa post:
Grand Rapids Impromptu Drink?
Mention GR and 28th street and the locals do not need the MI tag. :)
Anyway, I will miss this shindig, and will rather be baking in the Jersey heat. If you find yourself with time to kill, you might consider taking the kids to the Meijer Gardens.
posted to MetaTalk by caddis
at 11:55 PM on July 19, 2008
MeTa post:
Tags in RSS feeds
I would like to see the mods add tags to some more posts. Think about this, Jess is a librarian, with an eye towards how to best classify things for easy search. If she were to selectively add tags to posts they would become much easier to find. I sure would not object to having her add tags to any of my posts, rather I would welcome the professional help. We are rife with librarians, and then look at the great work the hoi polloi achieved in the tagging project. It's cool to have a... [more]
posted to MetaTalk by caddis
at 6:13 PM on July 18, 2008
MeTa post:
Y'all kick ass! Brag on Yourselves!
So we have. Thanks katilla. Shut it down.
naw, these are good filter threads and you tend to find some decent posts you otherwise missed.
posted to MetaTalk by caddis
at 6:36 AM on July 12, 2008
Broadswords in a pit was a nice find as was a reading of Ulysses. Which reminds me that we didn't have any Bloomsday stuff this year, but nevertheless this year's Bloomsday was packed with great posts.
posted to MetaTalk by caddis
at 7:01 AM on July 12, 2008
and everyone else was glad to see it go
posted to MetaTalk by caddis
at 12:26 AM on July 18, 2008
MeTa post:
More favorited posts, more awesomeness
Maybe, but we'd still have to limit it to like maybe paging back 5-10 times before putting an end to it
that sounds good
posted to MetaTalk by caddis
at 2:40 PM on July 16, 2008
posts totally win, always ;)
posted to MetaTalk by caddis
at 6:13 PM on July 16, 2008
I suspect if you made a post called "posts totally win" it would be deleted. The same is not true for comments.
I disagree.
posted to MetaTalk by caddis
at 8:44 AM on July 17, 2008
MeTa post:
A SHIT OBIT
You just compared Snow to Hussein? Get some perspective.
posted to MetaTalk by caddis
at 4:49 PM on July 12, 2008
MeTa post:
monkey king
There is a dumb ass expression around here that I really hate, but now it finally fits:
Loquacious wins!
posted to MetaTalk by caddis
at 7:46 PM on July 11, 2008
MeTa post:
MetaFilter: It is what it is
I understand where joeclark is coming from, but I think cortex expressed it well, the internet is different than it was in the first years of mefi. There are a bazillion link blogs, many quite good, and good links spread through the tubes of the internets with blazing speed. Someone who visits a number of linkblogs every day will be pretty much up on all the current cool links, memes etc. One thing has not changed for me about mefi though, it is the lazy surfer's paradise. I don't have time... [more]
posted to MetaTalk by caddis
at 7:32 PM on July 11, 2008
MeTa post:
Why anon?
My guess is that it was someone starting an exercise program
perhaps, but they are also running, biking, and weight-lifting on other days. That doesn't really sound like someone starting an exercise program.
posted to MetaTalk by caddis
at 3:21 AM on July 11, 2008
MeTa post:
"Wow, look at the Boobies!"
Also, I wish people would leave the MetaTalk posts to people who actually care enough to post themselves.
posted by smackfu at 3:37 PM on July 10 [3 favorites +] [!]
Are you kidding? Anastasiav has 200 of Metafilter's finest posts. She is a meta-goddess.
posted to MetaTalk by caddis
at 1:38 PM on July 10, 2008
MeTa post:
5 minutes of great reading.
It is but one style of great post (I loved it by the way). However, this was also a great post.
posted to MetaTalk by caddis
at 3:33 AM on July 3, 2008
We can be a rough group, really rough. Mostly, it is fair criticism, even if it is WRONG, LIKE IT WAS FOR THIS POST - YOU FUCKING BASTARDS DROVE SOMEONE AWAY BECAUSE YOUR PATHETIC READING ABILITIES DIDN'T ALLOW YOU TO FINISH THE WHOLE POST? WHAT A BUNCH OF MENTAL PANSIES!!!!!!!!!! Oh, sorry, brain burp there. So, basically, most of the time it is like when your one aunt who can't shut up, and who always judges everyone in the family quite harshly, and she is far below worthy to make such... [more]
posted to MetaTalk by caddis
at 8:31 PM on July 6, 2008
I guess that was a poor joke - sorry.
posted to MetaTalk by caddis
at 6:40 AM on July 7, 2008
MeTa post:
Metafilter - lessons learned from the BB problem?
I think the implication is that the editors at BB aren't in the same sort of dynamic as we are here: they are by and large dictating the content, where here we are by and large co-consumers of the userbase's content.
I do think that is important. I also think that all you guys truly believe in openness and transparency more fully than at Boing Boing. Talking the talk means nothing. You guys walk the walk. The mere presence of MeTa where... [more]
posted to MetaTalk by caddis
at 5:38 PM on July 2, 2008
MeTa post:
Ugh, all RIGHT, mom, I get it.
Just because the person who asked the question marked an answer as "best answer" does not actually make it the best answer.
posted to MetaTalk by caddis
at 11:50 AM on July 1, 2008
Gah, such obvious fishing for favourites, amirite?
Amyouwrong. Are you serious? Do you favorite those answers? Does anybody, unless they expand the knowledge base already expressed or somehow rise above the other answers?
posted to MetaTalk by caddis
at 7:45 PM on July 1, 2008
MeTa post:
MeFi Follow-Up: Joe Horn is Cleared of All Charges
That was disappointing, although predictable. You walk into someone else's house to rob them and die, too bad for you. You have put someone in fear of their life and if you lose yours over it I will not weep for you. If someone is leaving with the loot, death just does not seem appropriate. Winging them? Yeah, but you just can't cut the law that finely. I love, love, love Texas, but this is just not right.
posted to MetaTalk by caddis
at 5:20 PM on June 30, 2008
Wake up three of four nights a week for months on end to people trying to kick in your door, or smashing your car windows, or screaming at you "FAG!", or saying they are going to ass rape your girlfriend, or showing you their GHAT.
Blow their fucking asses away. This was not that though.
posted to MetaTalk by caddis
at 5:45 PM on June 30, 2008
I also believe the putting an old man like that, who is likely no threat and has no previous criminal record at all, in jail to be a total waste of tax payer money.
...
How do you know? The original article I read said the neighborhood had become inundated with crime.
If it was about the money, every drug smoker would be released mr. republican. The issue here is do we want people to be shooting thieves who are... [more]
posted to MetaTalk by caddis
at 6:17 PM on June 30, 2008
MeTa post:
First things first.
I think washburn is right in principle. Too many posts lately are poorly crafted with the important link essentially hidden. It does not need to be the first link, but it should be easy to discern. All too often you look to the one link that looks like the important one and it turns out to be some crappy background link to wikipedia. meh.
posted to MetaTalk by caddis
at 9:09 PM on June 29, 2008
By the way, that is my all time favorite religious joke, just barely edging out the top Biblical ways to obtain a wife.
posted to MetaTalk by caddis
at 9:13 PM on June 29, 2008
capspunctuationspacesevenfullwordswhoneedsem
posted to MetaTalk by caddis
at 2:32 PM on June 30, 2008
MeTa post:
Go Team?
jon, that was a ground floor window.
posted to MetaTalk by caddis
at 12:23 PM on June 20, 2008
the damn choices don't match up with the question
that is not the only question where that occurs - weird test
posted to MetaTalk by caddis
at 7:28 PM on June 22, 2008
Dammit, you people have pushed my sock puppets off of the first page, and have caused my IQ to sink. One of my sock puppets still has a firm grasp of the bottom of the list, but there my IQ has strangely risen. I think I am with Jon. I don't get it.
posted to MetaTalk by caddis
at 7:32 PM on June 22, 2008
Hah. Back on the front page for now.....
posted to MetaTalk by caddis
at 7:43 PM on June 22, 2008
that person though is currently both number 1 on mefi and number 1 in the whole world!
posted to MetaTalk by caddis
at 5:03 AM on June 23, 2008
MeTa post:
Spamspamspamspamspam
Nice trick.
Inject page with some coolness into blogosphere,
let it get popular,
invoke spam.
posted to MetaTalk by caddis
at 4:15 PM on June 12, 2008
MeTa post:
Palestine
you could have just mailed the mods instead of being such a drama queen about it. apparently you really do want to publically discuss your screwball position. I vote for closing this thread.
posted to MetaTalk by caddis
at 5:34 AM on June 11, 2008
MeTa post:
Where did that link go?
I don't think anyone should be able to opt out of MeFi mail. That doesn't impose a burden upon them to answer, but they should at least get them. The you have mail indicator could be set up to show unread mail and recent unread mail (which is a feature all email should have - I don't read the spam and can't be bothered to even delete it, so that ruins the unread mail feature. we could fix that here)
posted to MetaTalk by caddis
at 6:07 PM on June 9, 2008
MeTa post:
Why do people make a post to say they've sent a mefi mail?
I am with missm on this one. When it is regular email the comment is appropriate, and its current use may just be a habitual carryover from before mefimail, as many of us had mail accounts specifically for mefi and didn't check them very often. However, there is a little box in the upper right hand corner of mefi pages that tells you when you have mail. I guess some people might miss that but I doubt that is enough of a concern to merit a comment about the mail in the thread. It comes off... [more]
posted to MetaTalk by caddis
at 7:28 AM on June 5, 2008
Another very valid use of email is to recommend a particular physician, lawyer, etc without plastering their name all over the internet. Some professionals would welcome the publicity, many would not.
posted to MetaTalk by caddis
at 8:25 AM on June 5, 2008
MeTa post:
Best Answer(er)
Very funny jp, very funny, and it does happen often enough. Anyway, I prefer a sense of community rather than a sense of competition. Let's leave the system the way it is.
posted to MetaTalk by caddis
at 7:03 AM on June 5, 2008
MeTa post:
Why the gender discrepancy?
The original one we argued about a bit behind the scenes and ultimately decided to let stand—it's definitely a citizen of Outer Chatistan, but we thought there was some reasonable merit at the core of it and gave it a pass.
The followup kind of wanders into a territory we try and avoid, where questions beget followup/mirror questions in kind of a me-too fashion, and the "okay here's the flip-side then" thing is more solidly into the realm of outright... [more]
posted to MetaTalk by caddis
at 7:44 PM on May 29, 2008
One was more artfully drafted, one generated less intelligent answers, but the dichotomy is real. They are essentially mirror sides of the same question. The real world effects, such as jackass answers in the second question, are real though. Regardless, I think either both should stay or both should go, realizing that if both stay it requires a heavy moderation burden to keep the second question.
posted to MetaTalk by caddis
at 7:57 PM on May 29, 2008
I guess I'll close this up then.
really? that smacks of GW not being able to take the heat of discussion, and really is not like you. Is something bothering you outside of mefi?
posted to MetaTalk by caddis
at 8:03 PM on May 29, 2008
If this was a simple choice between two posts and one had to go, it is a simple answer, the first one stays as it will likely produce far more interesting information. Nevertheless, the second question is valid. There does exist discrimination against males. Nine times out of ten no one cares, even the similarly situated males, as that discrimination is so outweighed by privilege. It is that other one time that might make interesting answers. Whether metafilter denizens could rise to that... [more]
posted to MetaTalk by caddis
at 8:31 PM on May 29, 2008
MeTa post:
It's "great" !
AUE is pretty hard core.
posted to MetaTalk by caddis
at 11:30 AM on May 22, 2008
Your usage of "thought" twice here is unwieldy and make (sic) your sentence difficult to parse.
tsk, tsk
posted to MetaTalk by caddis
at 1:21 PM on May 22, 2008
MeTa post:
deleted militarization thread
The article itself is just silly. Sure, these companies do business with the military, but so what? What bad effects come from that? They are not like defense contractors that get most if not all of their income from the military and are thus motivated to politic etc. on its behalf. The biggest one in the article, Pepsico, did $200 some million in business with the military which is a drop in the bucket compared to their $40 billion in sales.
posted to MetaTalk by caddis
at 11:33 AM on May 20, 2008