Wow. Look 6 posts down. Do people not even read the front page before they post? posted by gleuschk at 6:42 AM on December 16, 2002
Well, four panels must've read the front page because he/she quoted what oissubke wrote in the earlier post. Definitely odd. posted by witchstone at 6:48 AM on December 16, 2002
I suspect he quoted the same language in an effort to get in an ideological dig at oissubke. It seems a little juvenile, but whatever. posted by pardonyou? at 7:01 AM on December 16, 2002
I bet that Ben Stein is up to his old trick again. posted by Space Coyote at 7:03 AM on December 16, 2002
Exactly. It's a different article. Do people not even read the links before making knee-jerk assaults based on the similarity of ten words of FPP text, gleuschk?
That said, if this is a counter to the NewsMax post, perhaps it would have been better as a comment in that thread. But reading it, I think it has a it more content than that. posted by XQUZYPHYR at 7:04 AM on December 16, 2002
eep. "has a it" = "has a lot" posted by XQUZYPHYR at 7:05 AM on December 16, 2002
It's all in futility anyway, being that the link is to MSNBC Newsweek's front page and not the actual article. Neverminding the error in judgement of newsfilteritis, partisan bickering, etc. etc. posted by Stan Chin at 7:08 AM on December 16, 2002
Ok. Retracted, with apology. Sorry, four panels. posted by gleuschk at 7:10 AM on December 16, 2002
Is that just a shadow, or does that young swinger have a groovy soul-patch? posted by dgaicun at 7:23 AM on December 16, 2002
« Older
Open Source Copyright....
| Ruby-encrusted cellphone...
Newer »
This thread has been archived and is closed to new comments
posted by gleuschk at 6:42 AM on December 16, 2002