February 27, 2002
5:43 AM   Subscribe

Virgo? Leo? Virgo-Leo cusp? Who cares! All that really matters is your Birth Playmate! (eventual nudity)
posted by johnnydark (13 comments total)
 
Gee... But I was born in 1959!

Wah!
posted by jpburns at 5:53 AM on February 27, 2002


Somehow I find this depressing.
posted by bingo at 6:05 AM on February 27, 2002


Depressing when you stop and think that the model from my year (1967) is at least 52.
posted by Dean_Paxton at 6:12 AM on February 27, 2002


It would be much more telling to show the model today at her current age.
posted by mecran01 at 6:27 AM on February 27, 2002


I'm suddenly in the middle of the Free Porn episode of 'Friends'...
posted by feelinglistless at 7:45 AM on February 27, 2002


I hear you Dean. I am '67 as well. She was a hottie for sure, but what she must look like now......
posted by a3matrix at 7:46 AM on February 27, 2002


A3matrix: If you're 67 you should be glad to get your dying hands on a young fiftysomething filly like her.
posted by MiguelCardoso at 8:21 AM on February 27, 2002


He meant "born in '67."

Enjoy this site while it lasts, Playboy's hawk lawyers will be all over it by March, I'm sure.
posted by Fofer at 8:34 AM on February 27, 2002


She's been dead since 1929
How I cried that night
If only I'd been born in Lily's time
It would have been all right
posted by Kafkaesque at 9:25 AM on February 27, 2002


anyone want some free php?
the sites a bite buggered at the mo !!!
posted by monkeyJuice at 12:49 PM on February 27, 2002


eventual nudity

Were that more things in our world required this disclaimer.
posted by Shadowkeeper at 1:59 PM on February 27, 2002


Or the opposite disclaimer: no eventual nudity.
posted by bingo at 3:27 PM on February 27, 2002


Wow, shouldn't someone born in August 1993 not be able to see the playmate?
posted by alex3005 at 4:06 PM on February 27, 2002


« Older   |   Alzheimer's gene screened out from newborn. Newer »


This thread has been archived and is closed to new comments