Naked women. In run down, abandoned buildings. In german. What else do you need to know?
October 10, 2003 2:25 PM   Subscribe

Shedworks / uncommon scenes. Naked women. In run down, abandoned buildings. In german. What else do you need to know? NSFW, probably, but that really depends on where you work.
posted by signal (15 comments total)
 
Very cool, and safe for my work, also.
posted by davros42 at 2:47 PM on October 10, 2003


Why are there no guys in these sheds?
posted by meehawl at 2:56 PM on October 10, 2003


Signal. . I love this site and I love the way you posted it. Nice find!
posted by Danf at 3:04 PM on October 10, 2003


Very cool nude studies presented in post-industrial scenes. Love it.

OT/ What is this "work" thing everyone keeps talking about?
posted by elwoodwiles at 3:14 PM on October 10, 2003


Why are there no guys in these sheds?

there are, but it does seem to be much more slanted toward female nudes though... fine by me. The Female form always seemed more pleasing to me anyhow, even from a purely aesthetic standpoint.

Beautiful pictures. Good link, signal.
posted by phylum sinter at 3:27 PM on October 10, 2003


Where should I send food?
posted by ZenMasterThis at 5:01 PM on October 10, 2003


Zen: I'm assuming that since the site is in german, the chicks are not americans, meaning that they are not corpulent by default.
posted by delmoi at 5:10 PM on October 10, 2003


A number of the women photographed by the same guy as the male nude phylum sinter linked to are quite shapely (or, as delmoi would have it, "corpulent.")
posted by transona5 at 6:51 PM on October 10, 2003


For some reason when I first glanced at Signal's FPP, I thought it read that these were homeless naked women. And I was thinkin' is this the new way photographers find thin models? Then I read it again and realized they're just naked women being shot in condemned buildings, starving themselves for purposes of the camera, not having their pictures taken so they don't starve.

Either way, when you think about it, it's pretty sad. So yeah. Where do we send food?
posted by ZachsMind at 8:40 PM on October 10, 2003


So ZachsMind likes the fat girls?
posted by The Michael The at 9:19 PM on October 10, 2003


More importantly, can we drop the assumption that any thin woman is unhealthy, suffering from body image problems, and starving herself?
posted by kickingtheground at 10:08 PM on October 10, 2003


For those bored with looking at naked women in condemned buildings you might want to check out the photographer who inspires a lot of this art school foolishness: Ralph Eugene Meatyard. He was producing artful images of strange folks (many times with creepy masks) in gutted buildings probably before many of these men photographers were born.
posted by photoslob at 10:15 PM on October 10, 2003


Michael, I appreciate healthy women. Bones protruding from under skin isn't healthy. Neither is obesity. Most anything in between is fine. Most of the women in these photos are unheathfully thin. I don't understand how some find extraordinarily thin women so attractive.
posted by ZachsMind at 11:17 PM on October 10, 2003


I was being glib. I agree that healthy is a good descriptor for attractive women, but kickingtheground makes a very good point. Thin can be very healthy, bones protruding or not. I also didn't think that most of the women in the photographs were exceptionally thin. A few, yes, but not all by any means.
posted by The Michael The at 5:26 AM on October 11, 2003


Finally a post with meaningful social import...Good one, Signal.
posted by Pressed Rat at 1:11 PM on October 11, 2003


« Older Rush Limbaugh Checks Into Rehab   |   I love you, man! Newer »


This thread has been archived and is closed to new comments