Lust

May 28, 2005 1:07 AM

Lust Films is like a witty indie movie with full-on sex -- the hardcore video equivalent to Nerve, Fleshbot, and Sex in the City. Porn plots have never been so...watchable! Extremely NSFW, especially the trailers.
posted by NickDouglas (29 comments total)

Rancid explicitness, gynecological closeups of genitals and cliched homoerotic spooge scenes does not equate to hardcore either. Go back to school, fool.
posted by loquacious at 1:37 AM on May 28, 2005

Being of a pure, high-minded nature, I have always been deeply offended by Rancid explicitness, gynecological closeups of genitals and cliched homoerotic spooge scenes and anything that exploits women.

where are the best places on the net to view thay sort of filth if i want to be even more offended?
posted by joedharma at 1:47 AM on May 28, 2005

Could the video be a little smaller please?
posted by justgary at 1:54 AM on May 28, 2005

oh dear! it's a breast!
posted by blacklite at 1:55 AM on May 28, 2005

Rancid explicitness, gynecological closeups of genitals and cliched homoerotic spooge scenes does not equate to hardcore either. Go back to school, fool.

Um, it dosn't? How do you define "hardcore" then? Not that I'm a big fan of gynecological closeups (what's the point?) or anything, but that seems to be a pretty standard definition.
posted by delmoi at 2:28 AM on May 28, 2005

S.F.W., jerk.
posted by tsarfan at 2:37 AM on May 28, 2005

Hardcore? Bone breaking porn, it's so hardcore the bone just jumps out of the girls leg during a four way with a donkey lapping up the blood....
posted by pemdasi at 2:57 AM on May 28, 2005

*thump-thump*

Chipmunk Sex Videos?

*thump*
posted by Jack Karaoke at 3:30 AM on May 28, 2005

oh great. first the pictures of porn become obtuse through supercult and suicidegirls, and now porn movies are doing the same thing? have these people even seen classic porn?
posted by VulcanMike at 6:10 AM on May 28, 2005

While we're on the subject, why do guys need homoerotic spooge scenes in their porn? And, classically, in ultra-slo-mo?
posted by WolfDaddy at 6:22 AM on May 28, 2005

Any serious comment on porn movies had to take the narrativity of the genre into consideration. For instance, what the business names the 'money shot' (visible ejaculation) is not a realistic element but a narrative convention to enhance the believability of what happens on the screen.
posted by VulcanMike at 6:47 AM on May 28, 2005

Hardcore = visible insertion.

And 23skidoo, often a director will make two cuts of a film to have a "softcore" alternative for various cable networks that don't go completely hardcore. So many times, the softcore actors are actually having sex.
posted by Civil_Disobedient at 7:09 AM on May 28, 2005

Thanks for this NickDouglas.

I've been feeling for a while now that Metafilter didn't have enough Boobies links.

Unfortunately, I have to go now, as my dog seems to want steak or something.

P.S. Duke sucks.
posted by dersins at 7:22 AM on May 28, 2005

Perhaps I have a vision problem or the small size of the video, but I saw nothing that would make me want to see the whole thing. Then again, I'm probably not the target demographic.
posted by tommasz at 7:56 AM on May 28, 2005

I watched an Indian movie last night. There was no visible kissing. Four and a half hours. A romance. And no one kissed anyone except for a few pecks on the forehead between family.

I come here and people are talking about visible insertion.

Hardcore = visible insertion sex-related things you wouldn't usually dare to do on a busy sidewalk or in front of your parents

> there is visible insertion in this trailer.

Yeah, barely visible. This stuff will make you blind. If their films are anything like they advertise, this Lust Films thing is going to be very unpopular among people who expect to actually see sex in their porn videos.

And why are Alvin and Theodore doing the voiceover?
posted by pracowity at 8:18 AM on May 28, 2005

it's so hardcore the bone just jumps out of the girls leg during a four way with a donkey lapping up the blood..... And then they shout "Ta Da! The Aristrocrats".
posted by Nelson at 8:49 AM on May 28, 2005

I saw people actually having sex in the trailer for "The Good Girl".

Was that a trailer? I thought it was just a really small house.
posted by tizzie at 8:59 AM on May 28, 2005

This tit. It throbs.
posted by scarabic at 10:12 AM on May 28, 2005

pracowity : "Hardcore = visible insertion sex-related things you wouldn't usually dare to do on a busy sidewalk or in front of your parents"

Huh?

Hardcore includes fondling genitalia through clothing? Because I certainly wouldn't fondle anyone's genitalia through their clothing on a busy sidewalk or in front of my parents, but I doubt it's hardcore. And if that's the difference between hardcore and softcore porn, what is softcore porn? Kissing? Hugging?
posted by Bugbread at 10:37 AM on May 28, 2005

Insertion is where I've always understood that line to be drawn. (Well, they call it 'penetration'.) Soft core porn = naked people, maybe just posing, maybe acting lasciviously but never quiiiiiite having sex. Hard core = showing actual sex.

Or, to refer to the American cultural canon, Playboy is softcore but Hustler is hardcore (IIRC). Or late-night Cinemax vs. "Debbie Does Dallas".
posted by hattifattener at 11:40 AM on May 28, 2005

Softcore porn can be hilarious, especially back in the day when certain standards dictated restriction of movement, too. So you have these two good-looking, half-clothed people, "gently rocking" together for 20 minutes at a time to Zamphir or some shit.

Mind you, bad hardcore porn is damned depressing.
posted by dreamsign at 12:21 PM on May 28, 2005

So does anyone know how those male actors in softcore scenes (including mainstream movies) manage to get the scenes done without getting serious wood from seeing an attractive woman minus clothing?

Also, when they're doing the whole simu-sex thing and say the woman is riding the man, where the heck is he hiding his dick if he's not actually doing her?
posted by madman at 12:36 PM on May 28, 2005

madman : "So does anyone know how those male actors in softcore scenes (including mainstream movies) manage to get the scenes done without getting serious wood from seeing an attractive woman minus clothing?"

Well, for hardcore porn, the two main things that prevent prospective studs from getting the job are: inability to stay up, and inability to money shot on cue. Apparently the lights, crew, and frequent interruption / retakes are enough that not staying up seems the norm.
posted by Bugbread at 12:47 PM on May 28, 2005

But the trailer does have the fantastic version of Sunshine of your love by the one and only Spanky Wilson on it. Respect!
posted by ciderwoman at 1:12 PM on May 28, 2005

There needs to be more musical comedy porn
"What's a nice girl like you doing on a knight like this."
posted by Tenuki at 2:00 PM on May 28, 2005

Wikipedia says penetration or extreme fetish; dictionaries just say "extremely explicit." My main reason for posting was my long-time desire to see a watchable, if not stellar, movie where people with actual personalities had sex. That's why I compared it to Nerve and Sex in the City, in which sex is seen as a healthy part of a relationship, and as something classy. These films seemed to do the same.

But yeah, what a tiny trailer.
posted by NickDouglas at 3:16 PM on May 28, 2005

Where does 9 Songs fit in (haven't seen it)?
posted by PinkStainlessTail at 5:03 PM on May 28, 2005

posted by afx114 at 5:06 PM on May 28, 2005

Where does 9 Songs fit in (haven't seen it)?

Don't. It's the worst film I've ever seen. And heard.
posted by hot soup girl at 8:05 AM on May 29, 2005