The Carbon Cost of Spam
July 28, 2010 11:56 AM   Subscribe

The Carbon Cost of Spam: An Infographic This infograph hinges its authority on this fact: "0.3g of CO2 is emitted on average per spam e-mail." Is there any validity in this stated fact on this infograph?
posted by wherespaul (10 comments total)

This post was deleted for the following reason: as phrased it's unclear whether this is supposed to be here or over on Ask MetaFilter. If the latter, please post over there. If the former, please reframe this so it's clear that you know how the site works. You can do that tomorrow. -- jessamyn



 
Are you asking us a question or showing us a link?
posted by phunniemee at 12:01 PM on July 28, 2010


Shouldn't this be on AskMe?
posted by lholladay at 12:01 PM on July 28, 2010


You are not going to like the comments resulting from putting a question in your post.
posted by spicynuts at 12:02 PM on July 28, 2010


Interesting idea, but is this a good post?
posted by hippybear at 12:02 PM on July 28, 2010


wherespaul? more like wherespatrickjames, amirite?
posted by yhbc at 12:03 PM on July 28, 2010


RTFA:

"If you're curious, it looks like the data come from a 2009 McAffee study and CommTouch's most recent quarterly report."
posted by mrgrimm at 12:04 PM on July 28, 2010


What?
If you're curious, it looks like the data come from a 2009 McAffee study and CommTouch's most recent quarterly report.
Does that help? Or not?
Anyway, I thought this was going to be about the other Spam.
posted by zoinks at 12:06 PM on July 28, 2010


Every spam email is like a little fart.
posted by Termite at 12:06 PM on July 28, 2010


Oops.
posted by zoinks at 12:06 PM on July 28, 2010


I think somebody sharted.
posted by phaedon at 12:08 PM on July 28, 2010


« Older 5 Stupid, Unfair and Sexist Things Expected of Men   |   "Stripsody" is NOT what you think, you dirty old... Newer »


This thread has been archived and is closed to new comments