The Carbon Cost of Spam
July 28, 2010 11:56 AM Subscribe
The Carbon Cost of Spam: An Infographic This infograph hinges its authority on this fact:
"0.3g of CO2 is emitted on average per spam e-mail."
Is there any validity in this stated fact on this infograph?
This post was deleted for the following reason: as phrased it's unclear whether this is supposed to be here or over on Ask MetaFilter. If the latter, please post over there. If the former, please reframe this so it's clear that you know how the site works. You can do that tomorrow. -- jessamyn
You are not going to like the comments resulting from putting a question in your post.
posted by spicynuts at 12:02 PM on July 28, 2010
posted by spicynuts at 12:02 PM on July 28, 2010
RTFA:
"If you're curious, it looks like the data come from a 2009 McAffee study and CommTouch's most recent quarterly report."
posted by mrgrimm at 12:04 PM on July 28, 2010
"If you're curious, it looks like the data come from a 2009 McAffee study and CommTouch's most recent quarterly report."
posted by mrgrimm at 12:04 PM on July 28, 2010
What?
If you're curious, it looks like the data come from a 2009 McAffee study and CommTouch's most recent quarterly report.
Does that help? Or not?
Anyway, I thought this was going to be about the other Spam.
posted by zoinks at 12:06 PM on July 28, 2010
If you're curious, it looks like the data come from a 2009 McAffee study and CommTouch's most recent quarterly report.
Does that help? Or not?
Anyway, I thought this was going to be about the other Spam.
posted by zoinks at 12:06 PM on July 28, 2010
« Older 5 Stupid, Unfair and Sexist Things Expected of Men | "Stripsody" is NOT what you think, you dirty old... Newer »
This thread has been archived and is closed to new comments
posted by phunniemee at 12:01 PM on July 28, 2010