<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with 2ndAmendment</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/2ndAmendment</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with '2ndAmendment' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 25 Feb 2007 15:59:36 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Sun, 25 Feb 2007 15:59:36 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>Gun owners send message via friendly fire?</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/58946/Gun%2Downers%2Dsend%2Dmessage%2Dvia%2Dfriendly%2Dfire</link>
		<description> An editor at &lt;em&gt;Outdoor Life&lt;/em&gt; for nearly 30 years and member of the NRA for 40, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.jimzumbo.com/biography.html&quot;&gt;Jim Zumbo&lt;/a&gt; is a lifelong advocate of outdoorsmanship, hunting and gun ownership in print and on television.  Last week, Zumbo &lt;a href=&quot;http://razoreye.net/mirror/zumbo/zumbo_assault_rifles.html&quot;&gt;left a comment&lt;/a&gt; on his Outdoor Life blog commenting on the rising popularity of assault rifles for hunting calling them &quot;terrorist weapons&quot; and suggesting they should be banned from hunting use.  &lt;a href=&quot;http://nugeboard.tednugent.com/ubb/Forum1/HTML/286904.html&quot;&gt;Three days later&lt;/a&gt;, Zumbo&apos;s lifelong career is &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/02/23/AR2007022301709.html?sub=AR&quot;&gt;all but over&lt;/a&gt;, having lost all his product sponsorships, was publicly disavowed by the NRA, and his show was canceled. With the 2008 election season starting and a  Congress now controlled by the party supporting greater restrictions on assault weapons, Zumbo may be the first sign of a &lt;a href=&quot;http://corner.nationalreview.com/post/?q=MWI0Y2YwNTMzNjVhM2Y0YmYwM2UyZDllOWE3MGRiM2Y=&quot;&gt;zero-tolerance&lt;/a&gt; conservative constituency.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2007:site.58946</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Feb 2007 15:59:36 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>2ndAmendment</category>
		<category>AssaultWeapons</category>
		<category>AWB</category>
		<category>Guns</category>
		<category>NRA</category>
		<category>Zumbo</category>
		<dc:creator>XQUZYPHYR</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>granny get your gun</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/56569/granny%2Dget%2Dyour%2Dgun</link>
		<description> &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ajc.com/metro/content/metro/atlanta/stories/2006/11/21/1121copshot.html&quot;&gt;Plainclothes police &lt;/a&gt; serving a drug warrant &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2006/11/22/national/main2205048.shtml?source=RSSattr=HOME_2205048&quot;&gt;defend killing an elderly woman&lt;/a&gt; in the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cnn.com/2006/US/11/22/woman.shot.ap/index.html&quot;&gt;roughest neighborhood in Atlanta.&lt;/a&gt; Perhaps it&#8217;s a flaw in the &lt;a href=&quot;http://fourthamendment.com/blog/index.php?blog=1&amp;title=swat_team_in_atlanta_kills_92_year_old_w&amp;more=1&amp;c=1&amp;tb=1&amp;pb=1&quot;&gt;exclusionary rule.&lt;/a&gt; Or perhaps &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.dailyherald.com/search/printstory.asp?id=254366&quot;&gt;&#8220;had she been without her precious gun, she&#8217;d no doubt be alive today&#8221;&lt;/a&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2006:site.56569</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Nov 2006 14:26:51 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>2ndamendment</category>
		<category>4thamendment</category>
		<category>civilrights</category>
		<category>law</category>
		<category>policeabuse</category>
		<category>tragic</category>
		<dc:creator>Smedleyman</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>2nd Amendment decision</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/22122/2nd%2DAmendment%2Ddecision</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-me-assault6dec06.story"&gt;The right of the people to keep and bear grenade launchers.&lt;/a&gt; San Francisco&apos;s &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ce9.uscourts.gov/&quot;&gt;9th Circuit Court of Appeals &lt;/a&gt;ruled yesterday that the Second Amendment protects only the right of states to organize and maintain militias, not the constitutional right to keep and bear arms. The 3-0 &lt;a href=&quot;http://news.findlaw.com/hdocs/docs/gunlawsuits/silvlckyr120502opn.pdf&quot;&gt;decision &lt;/a&gt; upheld California&apos;s sweeping 1999 &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bradycampaign.org/press/release.asp?Record=204&quot;&gt;assault weapons ban&lt;/a&gt;.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.22122</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Dec 2002 07:16:38 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>2ndAmendment</category>
		<category>arms</category>
		<category>assaultweapons</category>
		<category>militias</category>
		<category>weapons</category>
		<dc:creator>gottabefunky</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/18639/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2002/07/23/national/23GUNS.html"&gt;Justice Department&apos;s Revised View of 2nd Amendment Is Cited as Defense in Gun Cases.&lt;/a&gt; If anyone has the right to own a gun, then committing a crime while carrying one shouldn&apos;t be an added charge, right? Now dozens of criminal defendants are asking the courts to dismiss gun charges against them. Maybe Ashcroft didn&apos;t think this one all the way through, especially considering the way his edict came out of left field the way it did.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.18639</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jul 2002 16:06:47 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>2ndamendment</category>
		<category>defence</category>
		<category>firearms</category>
		<category>gun</category>
		<category>righttobeararms</category>
		<category>secondamendment</category>
		<dc:creator>crunchland</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/16974/</link>
		<description> In a major policy reversal, &lt;a href=&quot;http://news.findlaw.com/ap_stories/a/w/1154/5-7-2002/200205071020812413_32-34.html&quot;&gt;the Justice Department has officially endorsed an individual right to bear arms&lt;/a&gt;.  In doing so, the Justice Department has abandoned its long-held position that the &lt;a href=&quot;http://lcweb2.loc.gov/const/bor.html&quot;&gt;second amendment &lt;/a&gt;is &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bradycampaign.org/facts/issuebriefs/second.asp&quot;&gt;limited in scope to protecting militia activities&lt;/a&gt;.  Does this mean the Justice Department will stop enforcing &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nraila.org/media/misc/FederalFirearms.htm&quot;&gt;federal laws&lt;/a&gt; that it sees as violating the 2nd amendemnt?  Should it?  If there is a individual right to bear arms, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nraila.org/FactSheets.asp?FormMode=Detail&amp;ID=25&quot;&gt;how &lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.shadeslanding.com/firearms/snyder.aw.ban.html&quot;&gt;far &lt;/a&gt;should it extend?   </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.16974</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 May 2002 00:29:05 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>2ndAmendment</category>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>firearms</category>
		<category>gun</category>
		<category>GunControl</category>
		<category>guns</category>
		<category>law</category>
		<category>legal</category>
		<category>RightToBearArms</category>
		<category>SecondAmendment</category>
		<category>US</category>
		<category>USPolitics</category>
		<dc:creator>boltman</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/11570/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.austin360.com/statesman/editions/wednesday/news_3.html"&gt; &apos;Invastion&apos; [sic] of Army recruiters unnerves jittery Austinites &lt;/a&gt; I guess we&apos;re just lucky that none of our fellow residents who (legally or illegally) carry concealed handguns took matters into their own hands!  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.11570</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2001 15:03:40 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>2ndamendment</category>
		<category>amendment</category>
		<category>austin</category>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>concealedcarry</category>
		<category>gun</category>
		<category>guns</category>
		<category>secondamendment</category>
		<dc:creator>tippiedog</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/7249/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.psr.org/violence.html"&gt;Feeling chest pains?  Maybe it&apos;s that gun in your pocket!&lt;/a&gt; Physicians For Social Responsibility want all doctors to screen patients for gun ownership, ostensibly so that they can warn them about the physical hazards said ownership can cause.  Hmmm...doctors don&apos;t do that for toasters, trampolines, hammers, paper, and other things that can harm you.  I&apos;m no gun lover - don&apos;t own one, never will, but this smacks of political agenda.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.7249</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2001 16:43:42 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>2ndamendment</category>
		<category>doctors</category>
		<category>firearms</category>
		<category>guncontrol</category>
		<category>guns</category>
		<category>physicians</category>
		<category>PhysiciansforSocialResponsibility</category>
		<category>PSR</category>
		<category>secondamendment</category>
		<dc:creator>davidmsc</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/6364/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.msnbc.com/news/543764.asp"&gt;Gun control the smart way.&lt;/a&gt; I abhor the idea of people taking away my right to own guns or impinge on said freedom.  However, this approach is much better than a nation-wide movement.  We Texans get to keep our guns and you Californians can get rid of yours.   </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.6364</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2001 06:24:55 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>2ndAmendment</category>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>GunControl</category>
		<category>MSNBC</category>
		<category>RightToBearArms</category>
		<category>SecondAmendment</category>
		<dc:creator>CRS</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


