<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with 800x600</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/800x600</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with '800x600' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2001 19:57:49 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 May 2001 19:57:49 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/7817/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.webreview.com/2001/03_16/webauthors/index01.shtml"&gt;The Myth of 800x600&lt;/a&gt; Stop desigining web pages for 800x600 screen resolutions, says this interesting article. &quot;The use of fixed-size pages is yet another example of our tendency to focus on technology rather than user behavior. The most commonly available statistics are for screen resolution, a measurement of a certain technology. More relevant, though, is the user-specified viewable browsing area.&quot;   </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.7817</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2001 19:57:49 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>800x600</category>
		<category>resolution</category>
		<category>screenresolution</category>
		<category>screens</category>
		<dc:creator>Outlawyr</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


