<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with AOL and technology</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/AOL+technology</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'AOL' and 'technology' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2006 11:18:51 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2006 11:18:51 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>Stamping Out Free Email</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/48879/Stamping%2DOut%2DFree%2DEmail</link>
		<description> When you really, &lt;i&gt;really&lt;/i&gt; want your email to arrive at its destination: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nytimes.com/2006/02/05/technology/05AOL.html?hp&amp;ex=1139115600&amp;en=adc81ef8bbdf0746&amp;ei=5094&amp;partner=homepage &quot;&gt;now you gotta pay postage&lt;/a&gt;.  Another brilliant, forward-looking idea for monetizing-the-Internet&lt;sup&gt;&lt;small&gt;TM&lt;/small&gt;&lt;/sup&gt; from the wizards at AOL and Yahoo.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2006:site.48879</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2006 11:18:51 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>AmericaOnline</category>
		<category>AOL</category>
		<category>email</category>
		<category>mail</category>
		<category>newsfilter</category>
		<category>postage</category>
		<category>technology</category>
		<category>USPS</category>
		<category>Yahoo</category>
		<dc:creator>digaman</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Google buys 5% of AOL</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/47667/Google%2Dbuys%2D5%2Dof%2DAOL</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2005/12/16/technology/16cnd-aol.html"&gt;Google buys a 5% stake in AOL.&lt;/a&gt; &lt;small&gt;For ... one &lt;i&gt;billion&lt;/i&gt; dollars.&lt;/small&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2005:site.47667</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Dec 2005 14:22:16 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>aol</category>
		<category>business</category>
		<category>google</category>
		<category>technology</category>
		<dc:creator>Tlogmer</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>IM: Not Just for Kids Anymore</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/35338/IM%2DNot%2DJust%2Dfor%2DKids%2DAnymore</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A54261-2004Sep1.html"&gt;Adults are picking up instant messaging&lt;/a&gt; in record numbers, with 50% of those over 35 using various systems.  This study was funded by AOL, which has a major stake in the instant messaging market through its popular AIM software.  But most people who use IM in the workplace are still using free and unsecured systems, despite the availability of secure versions in enterprise software and products like &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.zonelabs.com/store/content/catalog/products/sku_list_ims.jsp?lid=nav_fim&quot;&gt;IM Secure&lt;/a&gt;.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2004:site.35338</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2004 08:29:42 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>adults</category>
		<category>AOL</category>
		<category>communications</category>
		<category>demographics</category>
		<category>IM</category>
		<category>InstantMessaging</category>
		<category>internet</category>
		<category>online</category>
		<category>technology</category>
		<category>WashingtonPost</category>
		<dc:creator>etoile</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Microsoft still king of the hill</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/22026/Microsoft%2Dstill%2Dking%2Dof%2Dthe%2Dhill</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,3959,740753,00.asp"&gt;Liberty Alliance conceded defeat&lt;/a&gt;  last week to &lt;a href=&quot;http://wwww.passport.net/&quot;&gt;Microsoft .NET Passport&lt;/a&gt;. AOL, a key player in Liberty Alliance, just &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.betanews.com/article.php3?sid=1038832383&quot;&gt;disbanded it&apos;s Magic Carpet team&lt;/a&gt;, whose memebers were also the AOL point people for the Sun-led &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.projectliberty.org/&quot;&gt;Liberty Alliance Project&lt;/a&gt;, and played a very active role in its progression. How long do we wait until they start complaining about Microsoft having a monopoly in unified authentication systems?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.22026</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Dec 2002 15:26:16 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>.net</category>
		<category>aol</category>
		<category>authentication</category>
		<category>libertyalliance</category>
		<category>microsoft</category>
		<category>monopolies</category>
		<category>technology</category>
		<dc:creator>riffola</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/521/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://moviefone.com/"&gt;MovieFone&lt;/a&gt; (or 777film.com, or AOL/Moviefone if you want to be official) has long been my favorite place to look up movie showtimes, but lately I&apos;ve been running into problems. The biggest one is this: if you search for movies by theater, then hit &quot;more&quot; a couple times, it reaches a limit of about 12 theaters. Here in LA, that limit corresponds to a 4-5 mile radius. The theater I want to look up movie times at is maybe 7-8 miles away, but no where in the interface is a real &quot;search.&quot; It&apos;s all just lists and lists. Eventually, I found a list of local theaters (covering about a 20 mile radius) in the theater codes section, but it&apos;s not a real search engine, so looking up times at out of town theaters requires you to know the zip code of the place you&apos;re going to. I know they&apos;re trying to simplify their site by taking out a search engine, but what about the people that know exactly what they want? I use moviefone on the web because using it on a telephone requires you to navigate convoluted menu systems, but they&apos;ve transferred the phone experience to the web quite well.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2000:site.521</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Jan 2000 13:50:37 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>aol</category>
		<category>film</category>
		<category>moviefone</category>
		<category>movies</category>
		<category>search</category>
		<category>technology</category>
		<category>telephones</category>
		<dc:creator>mathowie</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


