<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with Advertising and branding</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/Advertising+branding</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'Advertising' and 'branding' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 11:39:42 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 11:39:42 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>Lovely Package</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/76104/Lovely%2DPackage</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://lovelypackage.com/"&gt;Lovely Package: The leading source for the very best that package design has to offer.&lt;/a&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2008:site.76104</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 11:39:42 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>advertising</category>
		<category>branding</category>
		<category>design</category>
		<category>package</category>
		<dc:creator>chunking express</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Product Placement Banned in U.K.</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/72503/Product%2DPlacement%2DBanned%2Din%2DUK</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.variety.com/article/VR1117987279.html?categoryid=14&amp;amp;cs=1&amp;amp;query=product+placement)."&gt;Product Placement Banned in U.K.&lt;/a&gt; Minister says it &apos;contaminates programs&apos;.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2008:site.72503</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jun 2008 10:26:32 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>advertising</category>
		<category>ban</category>
		<category>banned</category>
		<category>branding</category>
		<category>britain</category>
		<category>england</category>
		<category>productplacement</category>
		<category>television</category>
		<category>tv</category>
		<category>uk</category>
		<category>unitedkingdom</category>
		<dc:creator>jeremy b</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Christvertising</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/69935/Christvertising</link>
		<description> We believe that nothing is possible without the Lord&apos;s blessing and consent.  &lt;a href=&quot;http://christvertising.com/&quot;&gt;Your product is no exception.&lt;/a&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2008:site.69935</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Mar 2008 01:32:57 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>advertising</category>
		<category>branding</category>
		<category>christianity</category>
		<category>christvertising</category>
		<category>funny</category>
		<category>marketing</category>
		<category>video</category>
		<dc:creator>dhammond</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>&quot;Come on baby, buy my SUV&quot;</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/45644/Come%2Don%2Dbaby%2Dbuy%2Dmy%2DSUV</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.latimes.com/business/custom/cotown/la-et-doors5oct05,0,4065911.story?coll=la-tot-promo"&gt;&quot; Jim&apos;s ghost was in my ear, and I felt terrible&quot;.&lt;/a&gt; Like all top classic-rock franchises, The Doors can exploit a lucrative afterlife in television commercials. Offers keep coming in, such as the $15 million dangled by Cadillac last year to lease the song &quot;Break On Through (to the Other Side)&quot; to hawk its luxury SUVs. To the surprise of the corporation and the chagrin of his former bandmates, drummer John Densmore vetoed the idea. He said he did the same when Apple Computer called with a $4-million offer, and every time &quot;some deodorant company wants to use &apos;Light My Fire.&apos; &quot;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2005:site.45644</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Oct 2005 10:35:30 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>advertising</category>
		<category>Apple</category>
		<category>art</category>
		<category>branding</category>
		<category>brands</category>
		<category>Cadillac</category>
		<category>commerce</category>
		<category>JimMorrison</category>
		<category>music</category>
		<category>rock</category>
		<category>SUV</category>
		<category>SUVs</category>
		<category>TheDoors</category>
		<dc:creator>PenguinBukkake</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Yellow is the new black.</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/44183/Yellow%2Dis%2Dthe%2Dnew%2Dblack</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://typographi.com/001013.php"&gt;No logos project.&lt;/a&gt; &lt;i&gt;Delete!&lt;/i&gt;, fettered capitalism in Vienna.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2005:site.44183</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Aug 2005 14:28:59 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>advertising</category>
		<category>art</category>
		<category>branding</category>
		<category>culture</category>
		<category>logos</category>
		<category>marketing</category>
		<category>publicart</category>
		<category>subversion</category>
		<dc:creator>fatllama</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>MetaMarketing</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/40628/MetaMarketing</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.newyorker.com/fact/content/index.ssf?050328fa_fact"&gt;The New Pitch&lt;/a&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2005:site.40628</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Mar 2005 01:45:01 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>ads</category>
		<category>advertising</category>
		<category>branding</category>
		<category>business</category>
		<category>marketing</category>
		<category>promotion</category>
		<category>salespitch</category>
		<dc:creator>Gyan</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>These bodies are FREE, so get one NOW!</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/33148/These%2Dbodies%2Dare%2DFREE%2Dso%2Dget%2Done%2DNOW</link>
		<description> These bodies are FREE, so get one NOW!: Advertising and Branding in Social Virtual Worlds. [&lt;a href=&quot;http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=536422&quot;&gt;abstract &lt;/a&gt;/ &lt;a href=&quot;http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/Delivery.cfm/SSRN_ID536422_code366012.pdf?abstractid=536422&quot;&gt;PDF&lt;/a&gt;].
&lt;small&gt;Related to &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/mefi/33144&quot;&gt;this thread&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/small&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2004:site.33148</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 May 2004 12:25:51 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>advertising</category>
		<category>branding</category>
		<category>online</category>
		<dc:creator>signal</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Old Brands, Nostalgia And Remarketing</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/30992/Old%2DBrands%2DNostalgia%2DAnd%2DRemarketing</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://m1.mny.co.za/mkmt.nsf/0/C2256CC60027E805C2256D94003B0176?OpenDocument"&gt;Old Brands Never Die; They&apos;re Just Waiting For Someone To Wake Them Up:&lt;/a&gt; With the Nostalgia and Retro boom playing off the increasing number of niche markets made possible by the Web, it&apos;s time to start desperately plugging those favourite, time-honoured brands which  &quot;they&quot; unforgivably stopped making, leaving their loyal fans in the lurch.  What would you bring back, given half a chance? (&lt;small&gt;I&apos;ll weigh in with &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ipcvision.com/page05/lux-cig-01.htm&quot;&gt;Sobranie Black Russian&lt;/a&gt; cigarettes; the original &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.lasteditionbeetle.com/relatedsites.php&quot;&gt;Volkswagen Beetle&lt;/a&gt;; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.joesherlock.com/39Ply4.html&quot;&gt;the Oldsmobile&lt;/a&gt; or, definitely, the Olympia manual Monica &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bristolnf.com/traveler.htm&quot;&gt;typewriter&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/small&gt;)  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2004:site.30992</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2004 23:26:19 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>advertising</category>
		<category>branding</category>
		<category>nostalgia</category>
		<category>retro</category>
		<dc:creator>MiguelCardoso</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Feel our awesome naming fu</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/28324/Feel%2Dour%2Dawesome%2Dnaming%2Dfu</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://slashdot.org/articles/03/09/16/0034210.shtml?tid=126&amp;amp;tid=95&amp;amp;tid=98&amp;amp;tid=99"&gt;Verisign modifies the infrastructure of the net to point back to themselves.&lt;/a&gt; Verisign has rigged all .com and .net mistyped domains to reroute to their &lt;a href=&quot;http://sitefinder.verisign.com/&quot;&gt;branded search page&lt;/a&gt;.  This makes them effectively the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.verisign.com/resources/gd/sitefinder/implementation.pdf&quot;&gt;biggest cybersquatter&lt;/a&gt; on the net, and will make it impossible for most spam filters at the network level to operate as well as seriously &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.verisign.com/resources/gd/sitefinder/bestpractices.pdf&quot;&gt;complicating&lt;/a&gt; the lives of network administrators everywhere.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.28324</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2003 20:07:52 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>advertising</category>
		<category>branding</category>
		<category>domains</category>
		<category>squatting</category>
		<category>urls</category>
		<category>verisign</category>
		<dc:creator>dejah420</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Unbrand America</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/26326/Unbrand%2DAmerica</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://unbrandamerica.org"&gt;Unbrand America&lt;BR&gt;&lt;/a&gt; In the coming months a black spot will pop up everywhere...on store windows and newspaper boxes, on gas pumps and supermarket shelves. Open a magazine or newspaper - it&apos;s there. It&apos;s on TV. It stains the logos and smears the nerve centers of the world&apos;s biggest corporations.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.26326</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2003 09:37:56 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>advertising</category>
		<category>branding</category>
		<category>logos</category>
		<category>marketing</category>
		<category>unbranding</category>
		<dc:creator>mapalm</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>New UPS logo</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/24883/New%2DUPS%2Dlogo</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.ups.com"&gt;UPS revamps&lt;/a&gt; Its logo and branding.  The &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.adweek.com/aw/national/article_display.jsp?vnu_content_id=1848494&quot;&gt;unveiling&lt;/a&gt; occurred a week ago.  Say goodbye to the classic Paul Rand logo, and hello to yet another &apos;swoop&apos;!  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.24883</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2003 09:01:42 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>advertising</category>
		<category>branding</category>
		<category>logos</category>
		<category>redesign</category>
		<category>ups</category>
		<dc:creator>zanpo</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Kiss casket</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/23721/Kiss%2Dcasket</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.kissonline.com/kasket/body.html"&gt;Takes the phrase &quot;Get a Life&quot; to a new level.&lt;/a&gt; Those masterminds of marketing, those night rocking, day partying satanic minions, KISS, have achieved the ultimate score in product merchandising. That&apos;s right, it&apos;s your very own KISS coffin, and while you might think &quot;What&apos;s the point?&quot;, keep in mind that before you shuffle off this mortal coil, it doubles as a beer cooler.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.23721</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Feb 2003 06:37:23 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>advertising</category>
		<category>beer</category>
		<category>branding</category>
		<category>coffin</category>
		<category>death</category>
		<category>KISS</category>
		<category>music</category>
		<category>rock</category>
		<dc:creator>jeremias</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Branding, Brainwashing and Corporate Logos</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/23450/Branding%2DBrainwashing%2Dand%2DCorporate%2DLogos</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/graphic/0,5812,891305,00.html"&gt;Brainwashed?  Moi?&lt;/a&gt; Does this make you uncomfortable too?  Imagine it was &lt;i&gt;The Wall Street Journal&lt;/i&gt;&apos;s or &lt;i&gt;The Daily Telegraph&lt;/i&gt;&apos;s logo stamped on your forehead instead of &lt;i&gt;The Guardian&lt;/i&gt;&apos;s. Or all three. We are what we read, but perhaps wide reading is a thing of the past.  Beneath the po-mo jokiness, crude branding seems to have reached the normally label-resistant Left.  This is particularly true in the case of &lt;i&gt;The Guardian&lt;/i&gt;, the indispensable journal of reference for British students and teachers.   How many of us nowadays make a point of reading at least two politically divergent newspapers?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.23450</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Feb 2003 09:42:15 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>advertising</category>
		<category>branding</category>
		<category>corporations</category>
		<category>newspapers</category>
		<dc:creator>MiguelCardoso</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Orbitz Marketing head says Pop-ups are Great!</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/21728/Orbitz%2DMarketing%2Dhead%2Dsays%2DPopups%2Dare%2DGreat</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.i-street.com/featured/person/msands.asp"&gt;Orbitz Marketing head says Pop-ups are Great!&lt;/a&gt; Yes, I got this from Fark, but it is still worth a look.  The article includes the marketer&apos;s e-mail address.  Let him know what you think about his ads!  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.21728</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Nov 2002 11:53:15 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>advertising</category>
		<category>branding</category>
		<category>fark</category>
		<category>orbitz</category>
		<dc:creator>trigfunctions</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/20800/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.gp.com/brawnyman/"&gt;Brawny Man Finalists&lt;/a&gt; In the most tremendously important link of the day, the time has come for the public to select who will be the one and only Brawny man.  The field has been narrowed down to several finalists.  Which one will it be? Whose pecs will reign supreme?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.20800</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Oct 2002 13:10:25 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>advertising</category>
		<category>branding</category>
		<category>brawny</category>
		<category>papertowels</category>
		<dc:creator>oissubke</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/15597/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.alternet.org/story.html?StoryID=12617"&gt;Brand USA&lt;/a&gt; Naomi (&apos;No Logo&apos;) Klein on Charlotte Beers&apos; work to manage the US &apos;brand&apos;.  Sitting outside the US, a lot of what Klein says about external perception of the &apos;brand&apos; (and of Beers&apos; actions) seems quite believable to me, but I&apos;d be interested in hearing an insider view.&lt;br /&gt;
Klein&apos;s assertion that &quot;...&lt;i&gt;America&apos;s problem is not with its brand-- which could scarcely be stronger--but with its product&lt;/i&gt;&quot; seems relatively solid, and if it is, it seems that Ms Beers&apos; mission is all-but-impossible, or at the very least misdirected. &lt;br /&gt;
That said, the thrust of Klein&apos;s argument is the assertion that the US&apos;s values are basically incompatible with the whole idea of branding, and I&apos;d suggest that the same could be said of many countries.  I suppose the point here is that this specific exercise is rooted in the US&apos;s positioning of itself in the world at this point in time.&lt;br /&gt;
[Via &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.snowcat.blogspot.com/&quot;&gt;abraxas&lt;/a&gt;]  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.15597</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Mar 2002 04:59:57 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>advertising</category>
		<category>AlterNet</category>
		<category>AntiAmericanism</category>
		<category>branding</category>
		<category>BrandManagement</category>
		<category>BrandUSA</category>
		<category>BushAdministration</category>
		<category>CharlotteBeers</category>
		<category>ForeignPolicy</category>
		<category>ForeignRelations</category>
		<category>GeorgeWBush</category>
		<category>marketing</category>
		<category>NaomiKlein</category>
		<category>Post911</category>
		<category>spin</category>
		<category>USA</category>
		<category>USpolitics</category>
		<dc:creator>jonpollard</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/9988/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.economist.com/printedition/index.cfm"&gt;&lt;i&gt;The Economist&lt;/i&gt; says &quot;Brands are good for you.&quot;&lt;/a&gt; &quot;They not only simplify choices and guarantee quality, but they add fun and interest.&quot; You need a subscription to read the cover article (natch), but the cover that appropriates Naomi Klein&apos;s book title is at the link, and &lt;a target=_top target=_top href=&quot;http://www.economist.com/business/PrinterFriendly.cfm?Story_ID=770992&amp;CFID=438922&amp;CFTOKEN=83487868&quot; &gt;there is a companion article&lt;/a&gt; you can read. &lt;a target=_top target=_top target=_top target=_top href=&quot;http://www.nologo.org/article.pl?sid=01/09/07/1730209&amp;mode=thread&amp;threshold=&quot; &gt;Here&apos;s&lt;/a&gt; her response. Are there people who genuinely think that &quot;we&quot; are in charge of the brands? Is this the new corporate line--&quot;Can&apos;t we all just get along?&quot;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.9988</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Sep 2001 13:07:20 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>advertising</category>
		<category>branding</category>
		<category>naomiklein</category>
		<category>theeconomist</category>
		<dc:creator>aflakete</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/7412/</link>
		<description> any movement you can dish out.
if you look underground, chances are &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/cool/etc/hunting.html&quot;&gt;cool hunters&lt;/a&gt; will stop you in your tracks and ask to take your picture and learn about your ways. it sure feels good to be recognized. where do they go with your picture, you&apos;d wonder, i mean you never hear from them again.
turns out these guys turn around and sell your image to corporations who turn around and mass market it. so much for cool.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.7412</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2001 16:49:51 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>advertising</category>
		<category>branding</category>
		<category>cool</category>
		<category>marketing</category>
		<category>photography</category>
		<category>style</category>
		<dc:creator>elle</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/1521/</link>
		<description> &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.google.com&quot;&gt;Google&lt;/a&gt; appears to be &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.google.com/doodle.html&quot;&gt;telling a story&lt;/a&gt; with their logo. Is this a fun and creative way to &quot;extend their brand&quot; (as the marcom kids like to say) or do they need to stop letting their engineers handle their logo design?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2000:site.1521</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 May 2000 07:45:07 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>advertising</category>
		<category>branding</category>
		<category>google</category>
		<category>logo</category>
		<category>search</category>
		<category>searchengine</category>
		<dc:creator>jkottke</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


