<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with AmericanPolitics and war</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/AmericanPolitics+war</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'AmericanPolitics' and 'war' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 18 May 2004 20:59:03 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 May 2004 20:59:03 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>The Moral Case Against the Iraq War</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/33176/The%2DMoral%2DCase%2DAgainst%2Dthe%2DIraq%2DWar</link>
		<description> &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.thenation.com/docprint.mhtml?i=20040531&amp;s=savoy&quot; title=&quot;Let&apos;s look this thing in the eye once and for all. - Arundhati Roy&quot;&gt;The Moral Case Against the Iraq War&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;Also on the moral tip, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/4999734/site/newsweek/site/newsweek/&quot; title=&quot;Could Bush administration officials be prosecuted for &apos;war crimes&apos; as a result of new measures used in the war on terror? The White House&apos;s top lawyer thought so&quot;&gt;Memos Reveal War Crimes Warnings&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/4999148/site/newsweek/&quot;&gt;internal January  25, 2002, memo  by White House counsel Alberto Gonzales (PDF&lt;/a&gt;)  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2004:site.33176</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 May 2004 20:59:03 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>AlbertoGonzales</category>
		<category>AmericanPolitics</category>
		<category>iraq</category>
		<category>Iraqwar</category>
		<category>leaks</category>
		<category>memos</category>
		<category>middleeast</category>
		<category>mideast</category>
		<category>morality</category>
		<category>USPolitics</category>
		<category>war</category>
		<category>WhiteHouse</category>
		<dc:creator>y2karl</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Cherry picking shopping</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/27634/Cherry%2Dpicking%2Dshopping</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=34042"&gt;$20,000 bonus to official who agreed on nuke claim&lt;/a&gt; &lt;em&gt;A former Energy Department intelligence chief who agreed with the White House claim that Iraq had reconstituted its defunct nuclear-arms program was awarded a total of $20,500 in bonuses during the build-up to the war, WorldNetDaily has learned...His officers argued at a pre-briefing at Energy headquarters that there was no hard evidence to support the alarming Iraq nuclear charge, and asked to join State Department&apos;s dissenting opinion, Energy officials say.  Rider ordered them to &quot;shut up and sit down,&quot; according to sources familiar with the meeting.&lt;/em&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.27634</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2003 08:28:02 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>AmericanPolitics</category>
		<category>bribery</category>
		<category>corruption</category>
		<category>deception</category>
		<category>GeorgeWBush</category>
		<category>intelligence</category>
		<category>iraq</category>
		<category>iraqwar</category>
		<category>kickbacks</category>
		<category>middleeast</category>
		<category>nuclear</category>
		<category>nuclearweapons</category>
		<category>war</category>
		<category>WhiteHouse</category>
		<dc:creator>Ignatius J. Reilly</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Invasion Explained</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/24948/Invasion%2DExplained</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.minimumeffort.com/nutshell.html"&gt;Iraq in a Nutshell&lt;/a&gt; &lt;br&gt;
by O&apos;Reilly Books (not really)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;i&gt;A WARMONGER EXPLAINS WAR TO A PEACENIK &lt;/i&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;

A light hearted look at the oft repeated justifications for war in Iraq and their counter arguments.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.24948</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2003 11:58:08 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>AmericanPolitics</category>
		<category>Iraq</category>
		<category>iraqwar</category>
		<category>MiddleEast</category>
		<category>peaceniks</category>
		<category>terrorism</category>
		<category>USPolitics</category>
		<category>war</category>
		<category>warmongers</category>
		<dc:creator>nofundy</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Welcome your new (numerically challenged) liberal media overlords!</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/22931/Welcome%2Dyour%2Dnew%2Dnumerically%2Dchallenged%2Dliberal%2Dmedia%2Doverlords</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.cnn.com/2003/WORLD/meast/01/19/sproject.irq.protests/index.html"&gt;Media covers massive D.C. (and world) Anti-War protests, discounts numbers&lt;/a&gt; &lt;i&gt; - Backflash: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.npr.org/programs/atc/transcripts/2002/oct/021026.brand.html&quot;&gt;NPR&lt;/a&gt; and the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.iacenter.org/iraq_nytimes.htm#nyt&quot;&gt;NYT&lt;/a&gt; &lt;b&gt;later issued apologies for their drastic undercounting&lt;/b&gt; of the Oct. 26 D.C. Anti-War protest - &lt;small&gt; later admitted to be between 100,000 and 200,000 in size &quot;...It was not as large as the organizers of the protest had predicted. They had said there would be 100,000 people here. I&apos;d say there are fewer than 10,000&quot;(NPR&apos;s Nancy Marshall) &lt;/small&gt;&lt;/i&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.indymedia.org/&quot;&gt;&lt;i&gt;Last saturday&apos;s D.C. AntiWar protest&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;small&gt;received far more media coverage but a similar discounting of the numbers. IndyMedia (above link) provided numbers more in line with D.C. Police statements.  Many media outlets ran the same AP news feed. [&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nytimes.com/2003/01/19/national/19PROT.html?pagewanted=print&amp;position=top&quot;&gt;NYT&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.publicbroadcasting.net/wbur/news.newsmain?action=article&amp;ARTICLE_ID=4&quot;&gt;NPR &lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cnn.com/2003/US/01/18/sproject.irq.us.protests/index.html&quot;&gt;CNN&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://abcnews.go.com/wire/US/ap20030119_1143.html&quot;&gt; ABC&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/national/AP-Anti-War-Protests.html&quot;&gt;AP&lt;/a&gt;] and claimed...&quot;Thousands&quot; or &quot;tens of thousands&quot; of protesters. But in the words of those who witnessed it (as I did - 2.5 times size of Oct. 26 protest, from what I saw): &lt;i&gt;&apos;D.C. police chief Charles Ramsey said, &lt;b&gt;&quot;It&apos;s one of the biggest ones we&apos;ve had, certainly in recent times.&quot;&lt;/b&gt; U.S. Capitol Police chief Terrance Gainer said, &quot;I know everyone is skittish about saying a number, but this was big. &lt;b&gt;An impressive number.&quot;&lt;/b&gt; A C-SPAN cameraman I spoke to spent the entire protest on the roof of a cargo truck just to the side of the stage. He told me that he had covered dozens of protests in his time, and that &lt;b&gt;the crowd on Saturday was the biggest he had ever seen.&lt;/b&gt;&apos;&lt;/i&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.truthout.org/docs_02/012103A.wrp.dc.htm&quot;&gt;story&lt;/a&gt;)  &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.internationalanswer.org/&quot;&gt;and organizers claimed 500,000 marched in DC&lt;/a&gt; meanwhile, a new poll shows &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.villagevoice.com/issues/0304/kaplan.php&quot;&gt;support for a war on Iraq is slipping in the US&lt;/a&gt; and also&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.msnbc.com/news/861313.asp?0cl=c3&amp;cp1=1&quot;&gt; dropping at the UN&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/small&gt;&lt;/i&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.22931</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jan 2003 11:49:52 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>AmericanPolitics</category>
		<category>antiwar</category>
		<category>civildisobediance</category>
		<category>demonstrations</category>
		<category>iraq</category>
		<category>iraqwar</category>
		<category>media</category>
		<category>middleeast</category>
		<category>propaganda</category>
		<category>protests</category>
		<category>streetpolitics</category>
		<category>USPolitics</category>
		<category>war</category>
		<dc:creator>troutfishing</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/18721/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A4054-2002Jul26.html"&gt;Gore questions timing of Iraq concern&lt;/a&gt; Is it proper to invade Iraq?  This would be an unprecedented move for the US military as Iraq has not attacked the US anyone the US has defense treaties with. 
&quot;Republican National Committee spokesman Jim Dyke called Gore&apos;s comments &quot;irresponsible.&quot;
&quot;This is no time to attack the president or Republicans for their handling of the war for political gain,&quot; he said.&quot;

Hmmm..so he admits the Iraqi attack IS for partisan political gain, eh?  I would have never suspected it.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.18721</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jul 2002 11:16:29 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>AlGore</category>
		<category>americanpolitics</category>
		<category>GOP</category>
		<category>Gore</category>
		<category>invasion</category>
		<category>iraq</category>
		<category>iraqwar</category>
		<category>middleast</category>
		<category>mideast</category>
		<category>occupation</category>
		<category>republicans</category>
		<category>RNC</category>
		<category>UN</category>
		<category>USA</category>
		<category>USpolitics</category>
		<category>war</category>
		<dc:creator>nofundy</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


