<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with Bible and omg</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/Bible+omg</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'Bible' and 'omg' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 06 Apr 2006 15:08:40 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Thu, 06 Apr 2006 15:08:40 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>On the Gnostic Gospel of Judas.</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/50698/On%2Dthe%2DGnostic%2DGospel%2Dof%2DJudas</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2006/04/0406_060406_judas.html"&gt;Gnostic Gospel of Judas, they say!&lt;/a&gt; Hot on the heels of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/mefi/50676&quot;&gt;Christ On Ice&lt;/a&gt; and the, er, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/mefi/50669&quot;&gt;&quot;newly discovered&quot; Gospel fragment&lt;/a&gt;, the news outlets are currently &lt;a href=&quot;http://msnbc.msn.com/id/12186080/&quot;&gt;drooling&lt;/a&gt; all over &lt;a href=&quot;http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2006/04/0406_060406_judas.html&quot;&gt;National Geographic&apos;s&lt;/a&gt; recent conclusive dating and translation of surviving fragments of the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.earlychristianwritings.com/gospeljudas.html&quot;&gt;Apocryphal Gospel of Judas&lt;/a&gt;, now dated to about 300 CE. The text is classically &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.meta-religion.com/Esoterism/Gnosticism/gnosticism.htm&quot;&gt;Gnostic&lt;/a&gt;, emphasizing a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.religioustolerance.org/gnostic2.htm&quot;&gt;duality&lt;/a&gt; splitting Christ&apos;s &quot;spiritual&quot; and &quot;fleshly&quot; natures, as opposed to Christian orthodoxy&apos;s belief in the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/07706b.htm&quot;&gt;Incarnation&lt;/a&gt;. Looking beyond the wide-eyed &quot;OMG THIS WILL REVOLUTIONIZE CHRISTIANITY AS WE KNOW IT&quot; sensationalism, Internet Monk asks if a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.internetmonk.com/archive/the-stupids-do-new-testament-101&quot;&gt;300 year-old apocryphal biography of George Washington&lt;/a&gt; would be regarded as authentic were it discovered in 1970. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/11655998/&quot;&gt;James F. Robinson&lt;/a&gt;, an expert on ancient Egyptian texts, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.livescience.com/history/060303_ap_gospel_judas.html&quot;&gt;regards the Judas Gospel as mostly a dud&lt;/a&gt;, produced by Cainite Gnostics who took it upon themselves to &quot;rehabilitate&quot; villians of Bible mythos. Even if you don&apos;t believe in the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.gnpcb.org/esv/search/?q=Luke+22:47-53&quot;&gt;account&lt;/a&gt; of Judas, there&apos;s no denying his &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.beliefnet.com/story/124/story_12434.html&quot;&gt;contributions&lt;/a&gt; to the Christian narrative. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.tektonics.org/gk/judasdeath.html&quot;&gt;Truly&lt;/a&gt; a historical icon.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2006:site.50698</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Apr 2006 15:08:40 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>archeology</category>
		<category>bible</category>
		<category>gnostic</category>
		<category>gnosticism</category>
		<category>gospel</category>
		<category>history</category>
		<category>judas</category>
		<category>nationalgeographic</category>
		<category>omg</category>
		<dc:creator>brownpau</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Alpha</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/48689/Alpha</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://bede.org.uk/Evolution.htm"&gt;&quot;Who&apos;s afraid of evolutionary biology?&quot;&lt;/a&gt; (I&apos;ve linked Bede before, but this piece bears a much more important message to Christians who feel it their biblical duty to get hot and bothered over evolution and origin-of-life issues.) Also see a &lt;a href=&quot;http://godandscience.org/youngearth/youngearth.html&quot;&gt;Christian response to &quot;Young Earth&quot; apologetics&lt;/a&gt;, and the &lt;a href=&quot;http://answersincreation.org/young_earth_creationist_argument_index.htm&quot;&gt;Young Earth Argument Index&lt;/a&gt;, both from &quot;Old Earth&quot; Creationists who disagree with 6-Day biblical literalism. (Note that Old Earthers may still be Intelligent Design advocates. Heaping spoonsful of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.mos.org/sln/sem/ksalt.html&quot;&gt;salt&lt;/a&gt; all around.) If that&apos;s still too &quot;Christian&quot; for you&lt;a href=&quot;http://metatalk.metafilter.com/mefi/11152&quot;&gt;,&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://talkorigins.org/faqs/interpretations.html&quot;&gt;Talk.Origins&lt;/a&gt; has a summary of other Genesis interpretations.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2006:site.48689</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jan 2006 18:59:15 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>alpha</category>
		<category>bible</category>
		<category>christianity</category>
		<category>creationism</category>
		<category>evolution</category>
		<category>genesis</category>
		<category>intelligentdesign</category>
		<category>oldearth</category>
		<category>omg</category>
		<category>religion</category>
		<category>youngearth</category>
		<dc:creator>brownpau</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>An ex-atheist&apos;s testimony</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/48624/An%2Dexatheists%2Dtestimony</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.ex-atheist.com/from-skepticism-to-worship.html"&gt;From Skepticism to Worship.&lt;/a&gt; &quot;I made a resolution to read the entire Bible again, only this time I was going to read it as I would poetry or fiction, and not as a proposal of fact.&quot; An &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ex-atheist.com/&quot;&gt;ex-atheist&apos;s&lt;/a&gt; story.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2006:site.48624</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2006 09:53:13 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>atheism</category>
		<category>bible</category>
		<category>christianity</category>
		<category>exatheist</category>
		<category>omg</category>
		<category>religion</category>
		<dc:creator>brownpau</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Textual Criticism and the Reliability of Scripture</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/48494/Textual%2DCriticism%2Dand%2Dthe%2DReliability%2Dof%2DScripture</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.str.org/site/News2?page=NewsArticle&amp;amp;id=6068"&gt;Reconstructing Aunt Sally&apos;s Secret Recipe.&lt;/a&gt; Addressing the Retranslations Fallacy, a common misconception about how the Bible we read has been handed down to us. &lt;small&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://str.typepad.com/weblog/2006/01/aunt_sallys_sec.html&quot;&gt;[via]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/small&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2006:site.48494</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2006 12:38:34 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>bible</category>
		<category>christianity</category>
		<category>criticism</category>
		<category>history</category>
		<category>literature</category>
		<category>omg</category>
		<dc:creator>brownpau</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


