<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with BinLaden and nuclear</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/BinLaden+nuclear</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'BinLaden' and 'nuclear' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 17 Nov 2001 00:32:54 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Sat, 17 Nov 2001 00:32:54 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/12431/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.villagevoice.com/issues/0147/ridgeway2.php"&gt;Bin Laden, Al Qaeda, BBC, CNN, Times of London, Tom Ridge, the public - who is duping whom ?&lt;/a&gt; On November 15, the BBC and the Times of London report &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/0,,2001390014-2001395995,00.html&quot;&gt;Bin Laden&apos;s nuclear secrets have been found&lt;/a&gt;. The next day CNN also reports &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cnn.com/2001/WORLD/asiapcf/central/11/16/ret.amanpour.otsc/index.html&quot;&gt;nuclear weapons-related documents found in an al Qaeda safe house &lt;/a&gt;. Tom Ridge &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cnn.com/2001/US/11/15/ret.ridge.nuclear/index.html&quot;&gt;confirms the story&lt;/a&gt;. The same day, the Village Voice reports the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.villagevoice.com/issues/0147/ridgeway2.php&quot;&gt;hoax&lt;/a&gt; spotted by the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.dailyrotten.com/&quot;&gt;Daily Rotten&lt;/a&gt; given their command of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.qis.net/~jimjr/misc62.htm&quot;&gt;thermo nuclear science&lt;/a&gt;. God help us all.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.12431</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Nov 2001 00:32:54 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>Afghanistan</category>
		<category>alQaeda</category>
		<category>binLaden</category>
		<category>DailyRotten</category>
		<category>hoax</category>
		<category>nuclear</category>
		<category>terrorism</category>
		<category>VillageVoice</category>
		<dc:creator>Voyageman</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/12312/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/amex/bomb/sfeature/mapablast.html"&gt;Would you survive nuclear blast?&lt;/a&gt; With all the talk of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.usatoday.com/news/attack/2001/11/10/binladen.htm&quot;&gt;Bin Laden&apos;s nuclear capabilities&lt;/a&gt; lately,  you may be interested in this link again. Its been posted before, but  not in this context I presume.... 

I wonder where the fallout would have the worst affect?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.12312</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2001 10:57:31 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>binLaden</category>
		<category>nuclear</category>
		<category>nukes</category>
		<category>survival</category>
		<category>weapons</category>
		<dc:creator>Espoo2</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/12230/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://dailynews.yahoo.com/h/nm/20011109/ts/attack_binladen_dc_9.html"&gt;Paper says bin Laden claims he has nuclear weapons.&lt;/a&gt; Pakistan&apos;s respected Dawn newspaper said on Saturday bin Laden, in an interview inside Afghanistan, said he had nuclear and chemical weapons and might use them to respond to U.S. attacks. Maybe he read &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/mefi/12173&quot;&gt;DSSi&apos;s strategic scenario analysis&lt;/a&gt;.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.12230</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2001 19:55:16 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>Afghanistan</category>
		<category>alQaeda</category>
		<category>binLaden</category>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>nuclear</category>
		<category>NuclearWeapons</category>
		<category>nukes</category>
		<category>terrorism</category>
		<dc:creator>tranquileye</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/10497/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://physicstoday.org/pt/vol-54/iss-7/p29.html"&gt;Not trying to be alarmist or anything&lt;/a&gt;  but this article frightens me. It was from July and they explicitly name Bin Laden as trying to aquire nuclear materials.

It is possibly nothing, but made me wonder.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.10497</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2001 20:33:08 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>binladen</category>
		<category>nuclear</category>
		<category>obl</category>
		<category>osama</category>
		<category>osamabinladen</category>
		<category>terrorism</category>
		<dc:creator>Benway</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


