<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with BiologicalWarfare</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/BiologicalWarfare</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'BiologicalWarfare' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jul 2002 17:26:31 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Jul 2002 17:26:31 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/18253/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.csis.org/burke/hd/reports/Buffy012902.pdf"&gt;Buffy the Terrorism Slayer&lt;/a&gt; (PDF link) The &lt;a href=&quot;http://csis.org&quot;&gt;Center For Strategic &amp;amp; International Studies&lt;/a&gt;, which appears to be, like, a bunch of grown-up &lt;a href=&quot;http://csis.org/html/4nunn.htm&quot;&gt;ex-senators&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;http://csis.org/html/4kissinger.htm&quot;&gt;accused war criminals&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;http://csis.org/html/4woolsey.htm&quot;&gt;former top spooks&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;http://csis.org/about/index.htm#4&quot;&gt;such&lt;/a&gt;, released this white paper late last September.

&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;i&gt;Any structured intellectual approach to describing this situation &amp;#151; and planning for it &amp;#151; is so uncertain that a valid structure can only be developed as an exercise in complexity or &quot;chaos&quot; theory. I, however, would like you to think about the biological threat in more mundane terms. I am going to suggest that you think about biological warfare in terms of a TV show called &quot;Buffy the Vampire Slayer,&quot; that you think about the world of biological weapons in terms of the &quot;Buffy Paradigm,&quot; and that you think about many of the problems in the proposed solutions as part of the &quot;Buffy Syndrome.&quot;&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I am one vindicated overgrown Buffy fan. (Via &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ntk.net/2002/07/05/&quot;&gt;Need To Know&lt;/a&gt;.)&lt;/a&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.18253</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jul 2002 17:26:31 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>BiologicalWarfare</category>
		<category>BiologicalWeapons</category>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>Buffy</category>
		<category>BuffyParadigm</category>
		<category>BuffySyndrome</category>
		<category>BuffyTheVampireSlayer</category>
		<category>CSIS</category>
		<category>terrorism</category>
		<dc:creator>nicwolff</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/17275/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/hi/english/world/south_asia/newsid_1992000/1992451.stm"&gt;Mystery Illness&lt;/a&gt;  such a mystery? Help needed! (old news, new information?)
OK, I&apos;m going to try and do this without naming names...
The British troops in Afghanistan have been struck down by a &lt;a href=&quot;http://news.bbc.co.uk/hi/english/world/south_asia/newsid_1992000/1992451.stm&quot;&gt;mystery illness&lt;/a&gt; recently, with an investigation finding that the illness was just a &quot;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nbc4.tv/health/1467844/detail.html&quot;&gt;winter vomiting&lt;/a&gt;&quot; bug.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;b&gt;I&apos;ve heard different.&lt;/b&gt;
The source may have been an Al Qaeda terrorist who had been captured.
The &apos;mystery illness&apos; may have been caught when the British or US government used biological warfare to make it easier to find and capture members of Al Qaeda.
Can anyone help verify this? I should stress I only have word of mouth from a friend of a friend. All very speculative, but I&apos;ve not been able to find anything else on this... yet...  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.17275</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2002 08:17:50 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>Afghanistan</category>
		<category>biologicalwarfare</category>
		<category>biologicalweapons</category>
		<category>bioweapons</category>
		<category>conspiracy</category>
		<category>conspiracytheory</category>
		<category>disease</category>
		<category>illness</category>
		<category>soldiers</category>
		<category>UK</category>
		<dc:creator>snowgoon</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/11236/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.anthrax.osd.mil/"&gt;Defense Department&apos;s Anthrax Site.&lt;/a&gt; Wierd.  Wierd.  Wierd.  Click on FLASH version.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.11236</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Oct 2001 16:18:24 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>Anthrax</category>
		<category>ArmedForces</category>
		<category>BiologicalWarfare</category>
		<category>BiologicalWeapon</category>
		<category>BioWar</category>
		<category>BioWeapon</category>
		<category>DepartmentOfDefense</category>
		<category>DOD</category>
		<category>military</category>
		<category>vaccination</category>
		<category>vaccine</category>
		<dc:creator>xammerboy</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/7847/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://channel.nytimes.com/2001/05/20/world/20GERM.html"&gt;The Republican Administration is ready to back out of the verification and enforcement protocol for the Biological Weapons Convention&lt;/a&gt; , only their latest move after &lt;a href=&quot;http://channel.nytimes.com/2001/03/08/world/08KORE.html&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;abandoning talks with North Korea&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; on ending their nuclear and missile programs, slashing &lt;a href=&quot;http://channel.nytimes.com/2001/03/29/world/29POLI.html&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;assistance to Russia for dismantling their nuclear, chemical, and biological weapons infrastructure&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; in the new budget, going ahead with plans to &lt;a href=&quot;http://channel.nytimes.com/2001/05/12/world/12MISS.html&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;unilaterally abrogate the Anti-Ballistic Missile Treaty&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; that underlies nuclear arms control, and &lt;a href=&quot;http://channel.nytimes.com/2001/05/09/world/09SPAC.html&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;preparing to place weapons in outer space&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt;.  It&apos;s not a secret that the Administration is leaning toward &lt;a href=&quot;http://channel.nytimes.com/2001/05/09/world/09ARMS.html&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;tearing down the entire edifice of strategic arms control&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; and nonproliferation of weapons of mass destruction, but you would think there would be more of an outcry that the Republicans seem hell-bent on making the world a noticeably &lt;i&gt;less&lt;/i&gt; safe place as quickly as possible... especially taking into account the &lt;a href=&quot;http://channel.nytimes.com/2001/05/07/world/07EURO.html&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;other foreign policy faux-pas&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt; they&apos;ve committed in the past four months.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.7847</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2001 01:29:51 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>antiballisticmissiletreaty</category>
		<category>biologicalwarfare</category>
		<category>biologicalweaponsconvention</category>
		<category>chemicalweapons</category>
		<category>enforcementprotocols</category>
		<category>foreignpolicy</category>
		<category>missiles</category>
		<category>nonproliferation</category>
		<category>northkorea</category>
		<category>nuclearweapons</category>
		<category>republicanparty</category>
		<category>russia</category>
		<category>strategicarmscontrol</category>
		<category>wmds</category>
		<dc:creator>SenshiNeko</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


