<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with BiologicalWeapons</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/BiologicalWeapons</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'BiologicalWeapons' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 12 Apr 2006 09:13:23 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Wed, 12 Apr 2006 09:13:23 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>Weapons of mass obfuscation...</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/50845/Weapons%2Dof%2Dmass%2Dobfuscation</link>
		<description> Remember when US forces &quot;found the weapons of mass destruction?&quot; That announcement was made by President Bush on May 29, 2003 -- one day after this &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cia.gov/cia/reports/iraqi_mobile_plants/index.html#01&quot;&gt;CIA Intelligence assessment&lt;/a&gt; was published. In the weeks following, &lt;a href=&quot;http://observer.guardian.co.uk/international/story/0,6903,977853,00.html&quot;&gt;reports emerged &lt;/a&gt;that disputed the CIA&apos;s findings. Now, three years later, the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/04/11/AR2006041101888.html&quot;&gt;Washington Post says&lt;/a&gt; that the US Intelligence authorities already had &quot;powerful evidence&quot; that Bush&apos;s biological weapons claim was simply untrue.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2006:site.50845</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Apr 2006 09:13:23 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>biologicalweapons</category>
		<category>iraq</category>
		<category>lies</category>
		<dc:creator>327.ca</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Soft target attacks</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/45953/Soft%2Dtarget%2Dattacks</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.officer.com/publication/article.jsp?pubId=1&amp;amp;id=26239"&gt;What&apos;s next &#8212; Soft Target Attacks&lt;/a&gt; : Aerosol mists of biohazards in public places, like shopping malls. Or the &lt;a href=&quot;http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20051002/ts_alt_afp/ushealthtularemia&quot;&gt;National Mall in Washington DC on Sept. 24th of this year&lt;/a&gt; (see also: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2005/10/18/tularemia/&quot;&gt;Salon story&lt;/a&gt;). Coincidentally (?) &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.genengnews.com/news/bnitem.aspx?name=1072628XSL_NEWSML_TO_NEWSML_WEB.xml&quot;&gt;the University of New Mexico and Cerus Receive $23 Million to Develop Tularemia Vaccine&lt;/a&gt; (the agent detected on Sept. 24th). &lt;small&gt;&lt;small&gt;More terrorism scare released now to distract from the Plame indictments soon to come?&lt;/small&gt;&lt;/small&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2005:site.45953</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Oct 2005 09:26:39 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>biologicalweapons</category>
		<category>bioterror</category>
		<category>bioweapons</category>
		<category>Salon</category>
		<category>terrorism</category>
		<dc:creator>spock</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Where did those chemical and biological weapons come from?</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/24608/Where%2Ddid%2Dthose%2Dchemical%2Dand%2Dbiological%2Dweapons%2Dcome%2Dfrom</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2003/03/02/IN123519.DTL"&gt;Where did those chemical and biological weapons come from?&lt;/a&gt; &lt;br&gt;&#8221;According to the December declaration, treated with much derision from the Bush administration, U.S. and Western companies played a key role in building Hussein&apos;s war machine. The 1,200-page document contains a list of Western corporations and countries -- as well as individuals -- that exported chemical and biological materials to Iraq in the past two decades.&#8221;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;

I&#8217;ve always been surprised that this type of report doesn&#8217;t get more attention. During the UN hearings I half expected the Administration to level with the world and simply say: &#8221;We know they have the stuff because we sold it to them.&#8221;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.24608</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2003 15:13:55 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>arms</category>
		<category>biological</category>
		<category>biologicalweapons</category>
		<category>chemical</category>
		<category>chemicalweapons</category>
		<category>gulfwar</category>
		<category>iraq</category>
		<category>weapons</category>
		<category>weaponsofmassdestrution</category>
		<category>wmd</category>
		<dc:creator>peebo</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Speaking of gassing one&apos;s own people</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/24383/Speaking%2Dof%2Dgassing%2Dones%2Down%2Dpeople</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/international/story/0,3604,721898,00.html"&gt;Speaking of gassing one&apos;s own people: US Government admits it tested nerve gas (sarin and VX) on its own sailors (Project SHAD).&lt;/a&gt; This is in addition to the testing of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.wikipedia.org/wiki/MKULTRA&quot;&gt;LSD on civilians (MK Ultra)&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.infoplease.com/spot/bhmtuskegee1.html&quot;&gt;syphilis on 399 black Alabama men (Tuskegee Syphilis Experiment)&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.aracnet.com/~pdxavets/crossroa.htm&quot;&gt;radioactivity on American GI&apos;s (Operation Crossroads)&lt;/a&gt;, and the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.rense.com/general15/ofmicrobesandmock.htm&quot;&gt;secret testing of germ warfare tactics on American cities&lt;/a&gt;. It&apos;s really no surprise the &lt;a href=&quot;http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/1456088.stm&quot;&gt;US government rejected an international ban on biological weapons&lt;/a&gt;, and yet we personalize this imminent war with Iraq and claim the justification as the forced disarming of dangerous &apos;Weapons of Mass Destruction&apos;? I love the smell of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.infotrad.clara.co.uk/antiwar/warcrimes/v1201dre.htm&quot;&gt;hypocrisy&lt;/a&gt; in the morning.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.24383</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2003 17:04:51 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>biologicalweapons</category>
		<category>lsd</category>
		<category>nervegas</category>
		<category>radioactivity</category>
		<category>sarin</category>
		<category>syphillis</category>
		<category>us</category>
		<category>usgovernment</category>
		<category>vx</category>
		<dc:creator>letterneversent</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>US Soldiers At Risk from Chem Attacks</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/23731/US%2DSoldiers%2DAt%2DRisk%2Dfrom%2DChem%2DAttacks</link>
		<description> If Saddam Hussein were to use &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn?pagename=article&amp;node=&amp;contentId=A52241-2002Dec29&amp;#0172;Found=true&quot;&gt;chemical/biological weapons&lt;/a&gt; in an Iraq conflict, how safe would soldiers in the field be? The Department of the Defense &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2003/02/14/60minutes/main540691.shtml&quot;&gt;says &quot;no problem&quot;&lt;/a&gt;, but some of the men on the ground &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.sftt.org/pb02072003c.html&quot;&gt;seem to believe&lt;/a&gt; otherwise. The gear the soldiers will use to protect themselves and their water supply &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.sftt.org/article02072003a.html&quot;&gt;appears to be old, prone to failure&lt;/a&gt; while the training received in the usage of these tools looks inadequate. It could be the return of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.sftt.org/gwv.pdf&quot;&gt;&quot;Gulf War Syndrome&quot;&lt;/a&gt; (PDF).  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.23731</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Feb 2003 11:19:41 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>biologicalweapons</category>
		<category>bioweapons</category>
		<category>chemicalweapons</category>
		<category>iraq</category>
		<category>iraqwar</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>saddam</category>
		<category>saddamhussein</category>
		<category>war</category>
		<category>wmd</category>
		<dc:creator>owillis</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/18253/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.csis.org/burke/hd/reports/Buffy012902.pdf"&gt;Buffy the Terrorism Slayer&lt;/a&gt; (PDF link) The &lt;a href=&quot;http://csis.org&quot;&gt;Center For Strategic &amp;amp; International Studies&lt;/a&gt;, which appears to be, like, a bunch of grown-up &lt;a href=&quot;http://csis.org/html/4nunn.htm&quot;&gt;ex-senators&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;http://csis.org/html/4kissinger.htm&quot;&gt;accused war criminals&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;http://csis.org/html/4woolsey.htm&quot;&gt;former top spooks&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;http://csis.org/about/index.htm#4&quot;&gt;such&lt;/a&gt;, released this white paper late last September.

&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;i&gt;Any structured intellectual approach to describing this situation &amp;#151; and planning for it &amp;#151; is so uncertain that a valid structure can only be developed as an exercise in complexity or &quot;chaos&quot; theory. I, however, would like you to think about the biological threat in more mundane terms. I am going to suggest that you think about biological warfare in terms of a TV show called &quot;Buffy the Vampire Slayer,&quot; that you think about the world of biological weapons in terms of the &quot;Buffy Paradigm,&quot; and that you think about many of the problems in the proposed solutions as part of the &quot;Buffy Syndrome.&quot;&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I am one vindicated overgrown Buffy fan. (Via &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ntk.net/2002/07/05/&quot;&gt;Need To Know&lt;/a&gt;.)&lt;/a&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.18253</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jul 2002 17:26:31 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>BiologicalWarfare</category>
		<category>BiologicalWeapons</category>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>Buffy</category>
		<category>BuffyParadigm</category>
		<category>BuffySyndrome</category>
		<category>BuffyTheVampireSlayer</category>
		<category>CSIS</category>
		<category>terrorism</category>
		<dc:creator>nicwolff</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/17275/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/hi/english/world/south_asia/newsid_1992000/1992451.stm"&gt;Mystery Illness&lt;/a&gt;  such a mystery? Help needed! (old news, new information?)
OK, I&apos;m going to try and do this without naming names...
The British troops in Afghanistan have been struck down by a &lt;a href=&quot;http://news.bbc.co.uk/hi/english/world/south_asia/newsid_1992000/1992451.stm&quot;&gt;mystery illness&lt;/a&gt; recently, with an investigation finding that the illness was just a &quot;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nbc4.tv/health/1467844/detail.html&quot;&gt;winter vomiting&lt;/a&gt;&quot; bug.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;b&gt;I&apos;ve heard different.&lt;/b&gt;
The source may have been an Al Qaeda terrorist who had been captured.
The &apos;mystery illness&apos; may have been caught when the British or US government used biological warfare to make it easier to find and capture members of Al Qaeda.
Can anyone help verify this? I should stress I only have word of mouth from a friend of a friend. All very speculative, but I&apos;ve not been able to find anything else on this... yet...  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.17275</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2002 08:17:50 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>Afghanistan</category>
		<category>biologicalwarfare</category>
		<category>biologicalweapons</category>
		<category>bioweapons</category>
		<category>conspiracy</category>
		<category>conspiracytheory</category>
		<category>disease</category>
		<category>illness</category>
		<category>soldiers</category>
		<category>UK</category>
		<dc:creator>snowgoon</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/16944/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/hi/english/world/americas/newsid_1971000/1971852.stm"&gt;Beyond the Axis of Evil&lt;/a&gt;  - The United States has added Cuba, Libya and Syria to its &quot;axis of evil&quot; - nations it claims are deliberately seeking to obtain chemical or biological weapons.  The Under Secretary of State also warned that the US would take action.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.16944</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 May 2002 17:52:24 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>AxisOfEvil</category>
		<category>BiologicalWeapons</category>
		<category>ChemicalWeapons</category>
		<category>Cuba</category>
		<category>Libya</category>
		<category>SecretaryOfState</category>
		<category>Syria</category>
		<category>Terrorism</category>
		<category>UnitedStates</category>
		<category>WMD</category>
		<dc:creator>Stuart_R</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/15517/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.theage.com.au/articles/2002/03/09/1015365752044.html"&gt;Too many neighbors?&lt;/a&gt; Bioweapons can help solve that problem. Recently declassified documents say that one of Australia&apos;s leading scientists suggested just that in 1947.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.15517</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Mar 2002 09:37:45 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>Asia</category>
		<category>Australia</category>
		<category>biologicalweapons</category>
		<category>bioweapons</category>
		<category>genocide</category>
		<category>MacfarlaneBurnet</category>
		<category>SouthEastAsia</category>
		<dc:creator>gimonca</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/13776/</link>
		<description> &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nytimes.com/2002/01/13/national/13GERM.html&quot;&gt;More ammo&lt;/a&gt; for the &quot;U.S. brought it on themselves&quot; crowd, courtesy of the New York Times.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&quot;One report obtained by Dr. Zilinskas from the government is &quot;Development of `N&apos; for Offensive Use in Biological Warfare.&quot; `N&apos; was the code letter for Bacillus anthracis, the germ that causes anthrax. Another is &quot;The Stability of Botulinum Toxin in Common Beverages.&quot; The germ-derived substance is the most poisonous known to science.&quot;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Seems that the United States has been selling instructions for the creation of bio-weapons.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.13776</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jan 2002 20:40:50 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>biologicalweapons</category>
		<category>bioweapons</category>
		<category>news</category>
		<category>nyt</category>
		<category>war</category>
		<category>weapons</category>
		<dc:creator>Yelling At Nothing</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/12493/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/hi/english/world/americas/newsid_1663000/1663376.stm"&gt;Oh, the &lt;strike&gt;irony&lt;/strike&gt; inevitability:&lt;/a&gt; &quot;The United States is putting at risk a key United Nations conference on deadly biological weapons which gets under way in Geneva on Monday.&quot;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.12493</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2001 00:48:03 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>biologicalweapons</category>
		<category>geneva</category>
		<category>un</category>
		<category>unitednations</category>
		<category>usa</category>
		<dc:creator>donkeyschlong</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/11457/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.newyorker.com/FROM_THE_ARCHIVE/ARCHIVES/?011008fr_archive01"&gt;It&apos;s not about anthrax, but this piece&lt;/a&gt;  (by &lt;i&gt;Hot Zone&lt;/i&gt; author Richard Preston) from the &lt;i&gt;New Yorker&lt;/i&gt; a couple of years ago discusses smallpox, the reasons why we keep samples around instead of getting rid of it, how effective it would be if used as a biological weapon, how prepared we are, etc. etc. Also contains an interesting bit mentioning other threats of anthrax (and this was &apos;99).  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.11457</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Oct 2001 15:28:54 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>anthrax</category>
		<category>biologicalweapons</category>
		<category>newyorker</category>
		<category>richardpreston</category>
		<category>smallpox</category>
		<dc:creator>sherman</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/8090/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.japantimes.co.jp/cgi-bin/geted.pl5?eo20010605a1.htm"&gt;The Trial of Unit 731&lt;/a&gt; &quot;is the forgotten war-crimes prosecution of the 20th century.&quot;  In 1949, Soviet courts tried a unit of the Japanese Imperial Army for wartime biological weapons experimentation on human subjects.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
This article contains some gruesome descriptions.&lt;br&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.8090</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jun 2001 07:09:02 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>biologicalweapons</category>
		<category>japan</category>
		<category>military</category>
		<category>soviet</category>
		<category>trials</category>
		<category>unit731</category>
		<category>warcrimes</category>
		<category>weapons</category>
		<dc:creator>dfowler</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


