<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with Brain and Consciousness</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/Brain+Consciousness</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'Brain' and 'Consciousness' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 12:15:44 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 12:15:44 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>Feeling &apos;Selfy&apos; ? Regarding &apos;The Ego Tunnel: The Science of the Mind, and the Myth of the Self&apos; by Thomas Metzinger</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/85824/Feeling%2DSelfy%2DRegarding%2DThe%2DEgo%2DTunnel%2DThe%2DScience%2Dof%2Dthe%2DMind%2Dand%2Dthe%2DMyth%2Dof%2Dthe%2DSelf%2Dby%2DThomas%2DMetzinger</link>
		<description> &lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.abc.net.au/rn/allinthemind/&quot; title=&quot;Natasha Mitchell is an Australian science/health journalist, radio host and producer. She presents a weekly program called All in the Mind. &quot;&gt;Natasha Mitchell&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt;: So it&apos;s not a little man or woman inside our heads...&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;

&lt;em&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.philosophie.uni-mainz.de/metzinger/&quot; title=&quot;Professor of Philosophy, Director of the Theoretical Philosophy Group at the Department of Philosophy of the Johannes Gutenberg-Universit&amp;#0228;t Mainz. Head of Neurophilosophy Section at IFSN (Interdisziplin&amp;#0228;ren Forschungsschwerpunkts Neurowissenschaften). Coordinator Neuroethics Section. Adjunct Fellow, Frankfurt Institute for Advanced Studies&quot;&gt;Thomas Metzinger&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt;: ...that looks at pictures. But the experience of looking, of being directed to one&apos;s own feelings or to one&apos;s sensory perceptions of the outside world, this is itself an image. There is nobody looking at the image, it&apos;s like the camera is part of the picture or the viewing is itself a part of the process of viewing. This is how a first-person perspective emerges in our own case, the question is, okay, if it&apos;s not a thing, if it&apos;s not something in the brain, what kind of a process is it? &lt;/blockquote&gt; &lt;blockquote&gt;And I think it&apos;s a process, as philosophers say, of representing, that is of making an image, and that process is not there all the time. You know you have a conscious self in dreams, you have one in your waking life. During anaesthesia or during dreamless sleep there is no such thing as this process of self-ing, if I may call it like that.&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.abc.net.au/rn/allinthemind/stories/2009/2705963.htm#transcript&quot; title=&quot;&apos;Conscious experience is like a tunnel; extremely selective, what we see, hear, feel, smell is only a small fraction of what exists out there. The ongoing process of conscious experience is not so much an image of reality as a tunnel through reality...The brain constantly creates the experience that I am present in the world outside my brain...ultimately our Ego is an activation pattern in your central nervous system&apos; -Thomas Metzinger, The Ego Tunnel: The Science of the Mind, and the Myth of the Self&quot;&gt;You are &lt;em&gt;not&lt;/em&gt; a self! Bodies, brains and the nature of consciousness&lt;/a&gt; 

A review of Metzinger&apos;s &lt;a href=&quot;http://metapsychology.mentalhelp.net/poc/view_doc.php?type=book&amp;id=5170&amp;cn=396&quot; title=&quot;&quot;&gt;The Ego Tunnel: The Science of the Mind, and the Myth of the Self&lt;/a&gt;

From the review:&lt;blockquote&gt;Metzinger believes strongly that it is possible to solve the philosophical puzzle of consciousness only if we come to understand that to the best of our current knowledge there is no thing, no indivisible entity that is us, neither in the brain nor in some metaphysical realm beyond this world. Thus, highlighting a series of groundbreaking experiments in neuroscience, virtual reality and robotics, and his own pioneering research into the phenomenon of the &quot;out-of-body&quot; experience, Metzinger reveals how our brains construct our reality. According to him, our deepest sense of self is completely dependent on our brain functioning. 

The internal image of the person-as-a-whole is the phenomenal Ego, the &quot;I&quot; or &quot;self&quot; as it appears in conscious experience. The phenomenal Ego is not some mysterious thing or little man inside the head but the content of an inner image, namely, the conscious self-model. Metzinger claims that by placing the self-model within the world-model, a center, which we experience as ourselves, the Ego, is created. But, as Metzinger himself admits, one has to dissolve the problem of the subjectivity of consciousness if one wants to have the big picture. The ego tunnel is a consciousness tunnel that has evolved the additional property of creating a robust first person perspective, a subjective view of the world. It is a consciousness tunnel plus an apparent self. But, this is the challenge Metzinger takes in order to understand how a genuine sense of selfhood appears. &lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://blogs.abc.net.au/allinthemind/2009/10/you-are-not-a-self-thomas-metzinger.html&quot; title=&quot;His new book is The Ego Tunnel: The Science of the Mind, and the Myth of the Self, and we&apos;re dissecting the nature of feeling &apos;Selfy&apos; on the show. Selfy? Tune in for more.&quot;&gt;All In the Mind blog post&lt;/a&gt; on &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.perseusbooksgroup.com/basic/book_detail.jsp?isbn=0465045677&quot; title=&quot;We&#8217;re used to thinking about the self as an independent entity, something that we either have or are. In The Ego Tunnel, philosopher Thomas Metzinger claims otherwise: No such thing as a self exists. The conscious self is the content of a model created by our brain--an internal image, but one we cannot experience as an image. Everything we experience is &apos;a virtual self in a virtual reality.&apos; But if the self is not &apos;real,&apos; why and how did it evolve? How does the brain construct it? Do we still have souls, free will, personal autonomy, or moral accountability ?&quot;&gt;The Ego Tunnel&lt;/a&gt;

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg20127001.600-review-the-ego-tunnel-by-thomas-metzinger.html&quot; title=&quot;WHAT is the self? One answer is that it is the diamond in the rough that is you, the unique, immutable and indestructible jewel that makes each person who they are, the being amidst the becoming, the unfluxable within the flux. Kant called it the Transcendental Ego, which stands behind experience as the condition of its possibility. An alternative view endorsed by Buddha, Heraclitus, John Locke, David Hume and William James is that the self does not exist. &quot;&gt;New Scientist review preview&lt;/a&gt;

&lt;small&gt;&lt;small&gt;via &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.mindhacks.com/&quot; title=&quot;Neuroscience and psychology tricks to find out what&apos;s going on inside your brain. &quot;&gt;Mindhacks&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/small&gt;&lt;/small&gt; </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2009:site.85824</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 12:15:44 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>Brain</category>
		<category>Consciousness</category>
		<category>Dream</category>
		<category>Ego</category>
		<category>Lucid</category>
		<category>Mind</category>
		<category>Out-of-Body</category>
		<category>Self</category>
		<dc:creator>y2karl</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Wilder Penfield</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/74465/Wilder%2DPenfield</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://scienceblogs.com/neurophilosophy/2008/08/wilder_penfield_neural_cartographer.php"&gt;Wilder Penfield, Neural Cartographer.&lt;/a&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2008:site.74465</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 13:15:39 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>Brain</category>
		<category>Consciousness</category>
		<category>homunculus</category>
		<category>Mind</category>
		<category>MotorHomunculus</category>
		<category>Neuroscience</category>
		<category>Science</category>
		<category>Sensation</category>
		<category>sensoryhomunculus</category>
		<dc:creator>homunculus</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>The Limits of fMRI</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/74238/The%2DLimits%2Dof%2DfMRI</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.boston.com/bostonglobe/ideas/articles/2008/08/17/picturing_our_thoughts/?page=full"&gt;Picturing our thoughts.&lt;/a&gt; &quot;We&apos;re looking for too much in &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.mindhacks.com/blog/2008/06/the_fmri_smackdown_c.html&quot;&gt;brain scans&lt;/a&gt;.&quot;  &lt;small&gt;[&lt;a href=&quot;http://scienceblogs.com/cortex/&quot;&gt;Via&lt;/a&gt;]&lt;/small&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2008:site.74238</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Aug 2008 12:20:54 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>Brain</category>
		<category>BrainScan</category>
		<category>Consciousness</category>
		<category>fMRI</category>
		<category>Mind</category>
		<category>Neuroscience</category>
		<category>Science</category>
		<dc:creator>homunculus</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>To Read or Not to Read</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/65863/To%2DRead%2Dor%2DNot%2Dto%2DRead</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://consc.net/mindpapers"&gt;MindPapers&lt;/a&gt; - David Chalmers organizes, streamlines and expands his &lt;a href=&quot;http://consc.net/online/&quot;&gt;collection of papers&lt;/a&gt; related to mind and neuroscience.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2007:site.65863</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2007 06:11:08 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brain</category>
		<category>consciousness</category>
		<category>mind</category>
		<category>neuroscience</category>
		<category>philosophy</category>
		<category>resource</category>
		<category>science</category>
		<dc:creator>Gyan</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Philosophy and Neuroscience</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/65306/Philosophy%2Dand%2DNeuroscience</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.petemandik.com/philosophy/papers/brookmandik.pdf"&gt;The Philosophy and Neuroscience Movement&lt;/a&gt; (PDF).  A paper by &lt;a href=&quot;http://http-server.carleton.ca/~abrook/&quot;&gt;Andrew Brook&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.petemandik.com/&quot;&gt;Pete Mandik&lt;/a&gt; on the relationship between neuroscience and philosophy.  &lt;small&gt;[Via &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.mindhacks.com/&quot;&gt;MindHacks&lt;/a&gt;.]&lt;/small&gt; &lt;blockquote&gt;ABSTRACT: A movement dedicated to applying neuroscience to traditional philosophical problems and using philosophical methods to illuminate issues in neuroscience began about twenty-five years ago. Results in neuroscience have affected how we see traditional areas of philosophical concern such as perception, belief-formation, and consciousness. There is an interesting interaction between some of the distinctive features of neuroscience and important general issues in the philosophy of science. And recent neuroscience has thrown up a few conceptual issues that philosophers are perhaps best trained to deal with. After sketching the history of the movement, we explore the relationships between neuroscience and philosophy and introduce some of the specific issues that have arisen.&lt;/blockquote&gt; </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2007:site.65306</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Oct 2007 12:05:04 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>Brain</category>
		<category>Consciousness</category>
		<category>Mind</category>
		<category>Neuroscience</category>
		<category>Philosophy</category>
		<category>Science</category>
		<dc:creator>homunculus</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Sea squirts are totally sweet</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/59235/Sea%2Dsquirts%2Dare%2Dtotally%2Dsweet</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.livescience.com/animalworld/070305_blood_regeneration.html"&gt;Sea Squirt Regrows Entire Body from One Blood Vessel.&lt;/a&gt; Most famous as the &lt;a href=http://www7.nationalgeographic.com/ngm/0611/feature4/&gt;creature&lt;/a&gt; that &lt;a href=http://www.americanscientist.org/template/BookReviewTypeDetail/assetid/14370;jsessionid=baa9...&gt;settles down&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=http://www.langston.com/Fun_People/1992/1992AAC.html&gt;eats its own brain&lt;/a&gt; (though that is &lt;a href=http://www.fastcompany.com/magazine/24/cdu.html&gt;not exactly correct&lt;/a&gt;), it appears the humble &lt;a href=http://www.livescience.com/php/multimedia/imagedisplay/img_display.php?pic=070225_sea_squirts_02.jpg&amp;cap=These+fast-growing+sea+squirts+were+found+at+Larsen+A.+This+can+be+an+indication+of+a+first+step+towards+a+biodiversity+change+after+the+collapse+of+the+ice+shelves.+The+animals+in+the+foreground+are+colonised+by+two+crustaceans+and+a+brittle+star.+Credit%3A+J.+Gutt,+Alfred-Wegener-Institute&gt;sea squirt&lt;/a&gt; has spectacular &lt;a href=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Regeneration_%28biology%29&gt;regenerative&lt;/a&gt; abilities as well, thanks to regeneration niches packed with &lt;a href=http://stemcells.nih.gov/info/basics/&gt;stem cells&lt;/a&gt;.  All &lt;a href=http://r33b.net/&gt;glory&lt;/a&gt; to the sea squirt!  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2007:site.59235</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 21:58:32 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>Biology</category>
		<category>BloodVessels</category>
		<category>Brain</category>
		<category>Chordates</category>
		<category>Consciousness</category>
		<category>ElderGods</category>
		<category>Evolution</category>
		<category>Marine</category>
		<category>Mobility</category>
		<category>Regeneration</category>
		<category>Science!</category>
		<category>SeaSquirts</category>
		<category>Squirt-lover</category>
		<category>StemCells</category>
		<category>Tenure</category>
		<category>Tunicates</category>
		<dc:creator>homunculus</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Switching off self-awareness</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/51068/Switching%2Doff%2Dselfawareness</link>
		<description> Researchers have found that prolonged concentration on a difficult task actually &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn9019-watching-the-brain-switch-off-selfawareness.html&quot;&gt;switches off a person&apos;s self awareness&lt;/a&gt;. Fancy experiencing this sensation for your&lt;i&gt;self&lt;/i&gt;? That would be an oxymoron in existence. Just lay back and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.newscientist.com/channel/sex/dn7548&quot;&gt;let the orgasm take hold&lt;/a&gt;.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2006:site.51068</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Apr 2006 19:16:23 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brain</category>
		<category>consciousness</category>
		<category>human</category>
		<category>news</category>
		<category>orgasm</category>
		<category>perception</category>
		<category>philosophy</category>
		<category>reality</category>
		<category>research</category>
		<category>science</category>
		<category>sex</category>
		<dc:creator>0bvious</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>I&apos;m blue, da boo dee, da boo die...</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/48688/Im%2Dblue%2Dda%2Dboo%2Ddee%2Dda%2Dboo%2Ddie</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://bluebrainproject.epfl.ch/"&gt;Blue Gene bears Blue Brain beats Deep Blue.&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://scholar.google.com/scholar?num=100&amp;hl=en&amp;lr=&amp;c2coff=1&amp;client=firefox-a&amp;q=author%3A%22H+Markram%22&amp;as_ylo=&amp;as_yhi=&amp;btnG=Search&quot;&gt;Dr. Henry Markram&lt;/a&gt; answers questions in the &lt;a href=&quot;http://bluebrainproject.epfl.ch/FAQs.htm&quot;&gt;FAQ&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;a href=&quot;http://domino.research.ibm.com/comm/pr.nsf/pages/rsc.bluegene_cognitive.html&quot;&gt;Neurons  are beautiful&lt;/a&gt;.  Blue Gene/L is now the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.top500.org/lists/2005/11/basic&quot;&gt;fastest supercomputer in the world&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.research.ibm.com/tts/&quot;&gt;IBM Research&lt;/a&gt; rocks. Deep Blue &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.research.ibm.com/deepblue/home/html/b.shtml&quot;&gt;beat Kasparov&lt;/a&gt; almost a decade ago. &lt;a href=&quot;http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/4071192.stm&quot;&gt;F&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.economist.com/science/displayStory.cfm?story_id=4054975&quot;&gt;e&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/summary/308/5729/1738c?maxtoshow=&amp;HITS=10&amp;hits=10&amp;RESULTFORMAT=&amp;titleabstract=%22Blue+Brain%22&amp;searchid=1119808194758_2018&amp;stored_search=&amp;FIRSTINDEX=0&amp;fdate=10/1/1995&amp;tdate=6/30/2005&quot;&gt;e&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nature.com/news/2005/050606/full/435720a.html&quot;&gt;l&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.forbes.com/technology/sciences/2005/06/06/cx_mh_0606ibm.html&quot;&gt;i&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.computerworld.com/hardwaretopics/hardware/story/0,10801,102288,00.html&quot;&gt;n&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2005/07/0720_050720_bluebrain.html&quot;&gt;g&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.theconnection.org/shows/2005/06/20050613_b_main.asp&quot;&gt;B&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.windsofchange.net/archives/006973.php&quot;&gt;l&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.neuroart2006.com/&quot;&gt;u&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.neuron.yale.edu/neuron/&quot;&gt;e&lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://brain.cse.unr.edu/ncsDocs/&quot;&gt;?&lt;/a&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2006:site.48688</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jan 2006 17:51:05 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>ai</category>
		<category>biology</category>
		<category>brain</category>
		<category>consciousness</category>
		<category>ibm</category>
		<category>mind</category>
		<category>neuroscience</category>
		<category>research</category>
		<category>science</category>
		<dc:creator>reflection</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>The concept of the Transhuman: human, the self, consciousness and their effects on the law</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/47580/The%2Dconcept%2Dof%2Dthe%2DTranshuman%2Dhuman%2Dthe%2Dself%2Dconsciousness%2Dand%2Dtheir%2Deffects%2Don%2Dthe%2Dlaw</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.transhumanlaw.org/index.html"&gt;The first Transhuman Conference On the Law of Transhuman Persons:&lt;/a&gt; Whether or not you believe humans are set to evolve into gods, or AI is destined to achieve &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.transhumanist.com/volume1/moravec.htm&quot;&gt;self-awareness&lt;/a&gt; the idea of the &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transhuman&quot;&gt;Transhuman&lt;/a&gt; is a thought provoking concept. Philosophers have debated &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.philosophy.ucf.edu/texts.html&quot;&gt;the nature of the self&lt;/a&gt;, of the human for millennia. Is it time to start drafting new laws to govern &lt;em&gt;all&lt;/em&gt; possible sentient beings on this planet? or is it all just a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ibiblio.org/jstrout/uploading/MUHomePage.html&quot;&gt;science&lt;/a&gt; of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.technovelgy.com/ct/Science-Fiction-News.asp?NewsNum=505&quot;&gt;fiction&lt;/a&gt;? &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.granta.com/books/chapters/979&quot;&gt;a comfortable  humanist illusion&lt;/a&gt;?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2005:site.47580</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Dec 2005 17:43:01 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>ai</category>
		<category>awareness</category>
		<category>biology</category>
		<category>books</category>
		<category>brain</category>
		<category>computers</category>
		<category>consciousness</category>
		<category>evolution</category>
		<category>existence</category>
		<category>future</category>
		<category>human</category>
		<category>humanism</category>
		<category>mind</category>
		<category>news</category>
		<category>philosophy</category>
		<category>reference</category>
		<category>science</category>
		<category>scifi sf</category>
		<category>self</category>
		<category>sf</category>
		<category>singularity</category>
		<category>technology</category>
		<category>transhuman</category>
		<category>weird</category>
		<dc:creator>0bvious</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>This so called reality</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/46889/This%2Dso%2Dcalled%2Dreality</link>
		<description> If the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.dailycal.org/article.php?id=20361&quot;&gt;universe is a hologram&lt;/a&gt; and the healthy human brain a &lt;a href=&quot;http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/4360572.stm&quot;&gt;valve of consciousness&lt;/a&gt; then where&apos;d &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.scienceblog.com/cms/node/8288&quot;&gt;this mental infinity&lt;/a&gt; come from? &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.com/wiki/simulacrum&quot;&gt;Are we simply living the simulacrum&lt;/a&gt;? Or does &lt;a href=&quot;http://sprott.physics.wisc.edu/pickover/pimatrix.html&quot;&gt;Pi protect us all, forever, infinitely?&lt;/a&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2005:site.46889</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Nov 2005 01:38:08 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brain</category>
		<category>consciousness</category>
		<category>future</category>
		<category>human</category>
		<category>infinity</category>
		<category>mind</category>
		<category>perception</category>
		<category>physics</category>
		<category>pi</category>
		<category>reality</category>
		<category>schizophrenia</category>
		<category>science</category>
		<category>simulacrum</category>
		<category>universe</category>
		<category>weird</category>
		<dc:creator>0bvious</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>BrainMeta</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/42659/BrainMeta</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://brainmeta.com/"&gt;BrainMeta&lt;/a&gt; &quot;is a community site that was established for the purpose of accelerating the development of neuroscience through web-based initiatives, which include the development, implementation and support of a wide range of neuroinformatics tools, services, and databases. BrainMeta also functions as an internet hub for fostering communication between individuals involved with the neurosciences.&quot;  &lt;small&gt;[Via &lt;a href=http://www.mindhacks.com/&gt;Mind Hacks&lt;/a&gt;.]&lt;/small&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2005:site.42659</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jun 2005 13:28:38 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brain</category>
		<category>consciousness</category>
		<category>neuroscience</category>
		<dc:creator>homunculus</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Ramachandran for brain enthusiasts</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/42494/Ramachandran%2Dfor%2Dbrain%2Denthusiasts</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://mindbluff.com/phantom.htm"&gt;Phantom limb illusions&lt;/a&gt; Dr. Ramachandran is an investigator of the senses. His explorations on &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?articleID=0003014B-9D06-1E8F-8EA5809EC5880000&amp;pageNumber=1&amp;catID=2&quot;&gt;synesthesia&lt;/a&gt;, phantom limbs, and human consciousness are revealing excursions into sensory awareness. And his reader-friendly books, such as &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0131486861/metafilter-20/ref=nosim/&quot;&gt;A Brief Tour of Human Consciousness&lt;/a&gt; and  
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0688172172/metafilter-20/ref=nosim/&quot;&gt;Phantoms in the Brain&lt;/a&gt; (both from Amazon) are a pleasure to read. His greatest gifts appear to be a childlike simplicity, coupled with straightforward empiricism. His writing is easy-to-understand, often sparked with unpredictable humor. Recommended for all mind &amp;amp; brain enthusiasts who may not have heard of him yet.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2005:site.42494</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jun 2005 03:57:41 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brain</category>
		<category>consciousness</category>
		<category>limbs</category>
		<category>mind</category>
		<category>phantom</category>
		<category>synesthesia</category>
		<dc:creator>ember</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Lev Semyonovich Vygotsky and the neuronaut&apos;s guide to the science of consciousness</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/26928/Lev%2DSemyonovich%2DVygotsky%2Dand%2Dthe%2Dneuronauts%2Dguide%2Dto%2Dthe%2Dscience%2Dof%2Dconsciousness</link>
		<description> We are because of others. We are born into this world with minds as naked as our bodies and we have to rely on others to feed, clothe us, and to teach us to think of ourselves as selves. The key is language -- grammatical speech and human culture build upon the brain&apos;s biological capacities to create a mind that is something different again than that with which we are born. We are conscious because we can speak to others and ourselves, because we can speak of ourselves to others and ourselves. Language gives us as individuals, memory, and as groups, culture, the social memory. Or so &lt;a href=&quot;http://web.archive.org/web/19990423160218/werple.net.au/~andy/txt/lev1.htm&quot; title=&quot;Thinking and Speaking by Lev Vygotsky&quot;&gt;thought&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://web.archive.org/web/20010802101038/http://www.bestpraceduc.org/people/LevVygotsky.html&quot; title=&quot;It has been said of the Russian psychologist Lev Semyonovich Vygotsky that he possessed a Mozartian genius, yet he lived in a time and place that was not receptive to Mozarts. &quot;&gt;Lev &lt;/a&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.massey.ac.nz/~alock//virtual/trishvyg.htm&quot; title=&quot;Vygotsky: &apos;the central fact about our psychology is the fact of mediation&apos; - Introduction, Higher and lower mental functions, Intramental vs intermental abilities, The zone of proximal development, Psychological tools, Semiotic potential and the decontextualisation of mediational means,References&quot;&gt;Semyonovich&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://tip.psychology.org/vygotsky.html&quot; title=&quot;Social Development Theory - The major theme of Vygotsky&apos;s theoretical framework is that social interaction plays a fundamental role in the development of cognition. Vygotsky: &apos;&apos;Every function in the child&apos;s cultural development appears twice: first, the social level, and later, the individual level; first, between people (interpsychological) and then inside the child (intrapsychological). this applies equally to voluntary attention, to logical memory, and to the formation of concepts. all the higher functions originate as actual relationships between individuals.&apos;&apos; &quot;&gt;Vygotsky&lt;/a&gt;, among others. Welcome to the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.btinternet.com/~neuronaut/index.html&quot; title=&quot;This site is a guide to the study of consciousness and complexity. It&apos;s serious - no wacky stuff (although psi, dreams, quantum-C and such-like come in for critical discussion). But it&apos;s also easy reading, much of it being based on the four books and many articles I&apos;ve written on these subjects. You will find this site focuses on three basic arguments about the nature of consciousness. The first is that the human mind is bifold - as much a product of memes or cultural evolution as of the biology of brains. The second is that brain processing takes time - about half a second to develop a settled &apos;&apos;frame&apos;&apos; of consciousness. The third is that the brain is a specific example of something more mathematically general - a complex adaptive system (CAS). To understand consciousness demands getting deep into holism, hierarchy theory, biosemiosis, general systems theory, heterarchical causality and other obscure stuff that is guaranteed to blow the gaskets of any reductionist who dares to venture within.&quot;&gt;the neuronaut&apos;s guide to the science of consciousness&lt;/a&gt;.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.26928</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jul 2003 07:57:32 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>ape</category>
		<category>biology</category>
		<category>brain</category>
		<category>consciousness</category>
		<category>culture</category>
		<category>deaf</category>
		<category>ephesus</category>
		<category>feral</category>
		<category>grammar</category>
		<category>groups</category>
		<category>heraclitus</category>
		<category>historical</category>
		<category>imagination</category>
		<category>johnmccrone</category>
		<category>language</category>
		<category>levsemyonovichvygotsky</category>
		<category>memory</category>
		<category>mentalimagery</category>
		<category>neuronaut</category>
		<category>philosophical</category>
		<category>scientific</category>
		<category>templegrandin</category>
		<dc:creator>y2karl</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


