<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with Brain and intelligence</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/Brain+intelligence</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'Brain' and 'intelligence' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2009 17:48:16 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2009 17:48:16 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>The Genomic Self</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/78163/The%2DGenomic%2DSelf</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/01/11/magazine/11Genome-t.html"&gt;My Genome, My Self:&lt;/a&gt; Steven Pinker considers what we can expect from &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Personal_genomics&quot;&gt;personal genomics&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?id=searching-for-intelligence-in-our-genes&quot;&gt;Searching for Intelligence in Our Genes:&lt;/a&gt; Carl Zimmer looks at the hunt to learn about the role of genes in intelligence.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2009:site.78163</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2009 17:48:16 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>Biology</category>
		<category>Brain</category>
		<category>Cognition</category>
		<category>Genes</category>
		<category>Genetics</category>
		<category>Genomics</category>
		<category>Individuality</category>
		<category>Intelligence</category>
		<category>Mind</category>
		<category>Science</category>
		<category>Self</category>
		<dc:creator>homunculus</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Body symmetry and intelligence</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/60387/Body%2Dsymmetry%2Dand%2Dintelligence</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://scienceblogs.com/developingintelligence/2007/04/intelligence_is_your_peacocks.php"&gt;Body Symmetry and Intelligence&lt;/a&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2007:site.60387</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2007 00:30:28 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>biology</category>
		<category>brain</category>
		<category>health</category>
		<category>intelligence</category>
		<category>science</category>
		<category>symmetry</category>
		<dc:creator>Gyan</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>White Matter and Gray Matter a Matter of the Sexes</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/38832/White%2DMatter%2Dand%2DGray%2DMatter%2Da%2DMatter%2Dof%2Dthe%2DSexes</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://today.uci.edu/news/release_detail.asp?key=1261"&gt;She may not have the grey matter,&lt;/a&gt; but what&apos;s that matter anymore, anyway?

A recent study shows that men have more &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.applesforhealth.com/MentalHealth/ilbgm6.html&quot;&gt;gray matter&lt;/a&gt;, women have more &lt;a href=&quot;http://news-service.stanford.edu/news/2000/march1/dyslexia-31.html&quot;&gt;white matter&lt;/a&gt; and in the end these differences seem to be no matter.  Apparently men have more raw computing power, while women have a more efficient infrastructure -- resulting in similar general intelligence.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2005:site.38832</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Jan 2005 03:38:17 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brain</category>
		<category>intelligence</category>
		<category>men</category>
		<category>women</category>
		<dc:creator>ThePrawn</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Big heads wobbling on wee necks?....</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/31594/Big%2Dheads%2Dwobbling%2Don%2Dwee%2Dnecks</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://mind-brain.com/nootropic.php"&gt;Nootropics (&quot;smart&quot; drugs)&lt;/a&gt; - all wish to be smarter, correct ? And - while exercise, nutrition, learning, travel, and social interaction (the last 3 via release of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.lougehrigsdisease.net/als_news/970523new_molecular.htm&quot;&gt;neurotrophins&lt;/a&gt;) effectively do this, Nootropic drugs have been researched since the 1950&apos;s and have been shown to cause at least short term cognitive function enhancement. Piracetam, the first of this drugs, &lt;a href=&quot;http://members.aol.com/profchm/piracetam.html&quot;&gt;shows promise&lt;/a&gt; in the treatment of Alzheimer&apos;s and Attention deficit Disorder. Alas, as with poor little &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.scifi.com/sfw/issue76/classic.html&quot;&gt;Algernon&lt;/a&gt;, the effect seems &lt;a href=&quot;http://yarchive.net/med/nootropics.html&quot;&gt;temporary&lt;/a&gt;. Nootropics can be a little &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.totse.com/en/drugs/rare_and_exotic_drugs/notpmisc.html&quot;&gt;difficult to acquire&lt;/a&gt; in the US.&lt;small&gt;&lt;small&gt;&lt;small&gt; Beer is not a nootropic, but sex on the other hand.....&lt;/small&gt;&lt;/small&gt;&lt;/small&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2004:site.31594</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2004 10:11:01 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>ADD</category>
		<category>Alzheimers</category>
		<category>brain</category>
		<category>cognition</category>
		<category>cognitive</category>
		<category>drugs</category>
		<category>health</category>
		<category>intelligence</category>
		<category>medication</category>
		<category>medicine</category>
		<category>neuroscience</category>
		<category>nootropics</category>
		<category>pharmaceuticals</category>
		<category>science</category>
		<category>smartdrugs</category>
		<dc:creator>troutfishing</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/18051/</link>
		<description> &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.arts.scotsman.com/headlines_specific.cfm?id=5492&quot; title=&quot;smarter than your average bear, Boo Boo&quot;&gt;Musicians are really smart&lt;/a&gt;. They have larger and more sensitive brains than non-musicians, and their collective IQ is much higher. They have 130% more grey matter in one area of their auditory cortexes. The question of how this explains Ozzy Osbourne nonwithstanding, I&apos;ll  bet if you&apos;re really, really smart, you could be &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.menwithouthats.com/talent.html&quot; title=&quot;and bring your own equipment, not a load of crap, like they say on the site.&quot;&gt;one of the new members of Men Without Hats&lt;/a&gt;. Must be very knowledgeable in midi, sequences, and sampling.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.18051</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Jun 2002 16:59:53 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brain</category>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>intelligence</category>
		<category>IQ</category>
		<category>musicians</category>
		<category>neuroscience</category>
		<category>science</category>
		<dc:creator>iconomy</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


