<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with BritishTelevision</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/BritishTelevision</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'BritishTelevision' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 29 May 2006 16:25:56 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 May 2006 16:25:56 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>... which is to say to my mind, there is continuous repetition and propotionally they are a bit boring.</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/51927/which%2Dis%2Dto%2Dsay%2Dto%2Dmy%2Dmind%2Dthere%2Dis%2Dcontinuous%2Drepetition%2Dand%2Dpropotionally%2Dthey%2Dare%2Da%2Dbit%2Dboring</link>
		<description> On May 14th, 1967, the new British pop group The Pink Floyd makes one of their first ever TV appearances.  Despite a stellar performance of the song Astronomy Domine, the pretentious host of the show, Hans Keller, has nothing good to say about the band.  During the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=28n28ec3Xus&amp;search=pink%20floyd&quot;&gt;interview&lt;/a&gt; (youtube, performance comes first, interview starts about 5:50 in.  &lt;a href=&quot;http://members.aol.com/pgrsel/barrett/bbc0567.htm&quot;&gt;transcript here.&lt;/a&gt;), he chastises the band for their &quot;continuous repetition&quot;, &quot;terribly loud&quot; volume, and their &quot;proportionately a bit boring&quot; sound.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;However, it seems that all Hans&apos; show will ever be remembered for is &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&amp;lr=&amp;q=%22look+of+the+week%22+%22hans+keller%22&quot;&gt;this single interview&lt;/a&gt;.  Pink Floyd, on the other hand..  Well, we all know what happened to &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.billboard.com/bbcom/news/article_display.jsp?vnu_content_id=1002463719&quot;&gt;them&lt;/a&gt;.  Syd Barrett, on the other hand, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.schizophrenia.com/stories/sbarrett.htm&quot;&gt;was not so lucky&lt;/a&gt;.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2006:site.51927</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 May 2006 16:25:56 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>1960s</category>
		<category>bbc</category>
		<category>britishpsychedelia</category>
		<category>britishpsychedelicrock</category>
		<category>britishtelevision</category>
		<category>gods</category>
		<category>hanskeller</category>
		<category>heroes</category>
		<category>interview</category>
		<category>lookoftheweek</category>
		<category>music</category>
		<category>performance</category>
		<category>pinkfloyd</category>
		<category>pscyhedelic</category>
		<category>psychedelia</category>
		<category>psychedelicrock</category>
		<category>rockmusic</category>
		<category>rocknroll</category>
		<category>sixties</category>
		<category>sydbarrett</category>
		<category>television</category>
		<category>youtube</category>
		<dc:creator>Afroblanco</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>A dedicated follower of fashion</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/44040/A%2Ddedicated%2Dfollower%2Dof%2Dfashion</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/doctorwho/gallery/tennant/800/t4.jpg"&gt;The Doctor is in:&lt;/a&gt; David Tennant, the new Doctor Who (#10), has revealed his look to the world.  No &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bbc.co.uk/doctorwho/classic/episodeguide/index_fourth.shtml&quot;&gt;long scarf&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bbc.co.uk/doctorwho/classic/episodeguide/index_fifth.shtml&quot;&gt;cricket uniform&lt;/a&gt;, or &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bbc.co.uk/doctorwho/gallery/doctor01/800/02.jpg&quot;&gt;leather jacket&lt;/a&gt; this time... instead, a brown pinstripe suit and grubby Converse.  He calls it &lt;a href=&quot;http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/magazine/4717755.stm&quot;&gt;geek chic&lt;/a&gt;.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2005:site.44040</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Aug 2005 20:40:32 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>britishtelevision</category>
		<category>davidtennant</category>
		<category>deadlink</category>
		<category>doctorwho</category>
		<category>drwho</category>
		<category>fashion</category>
		<category>geekchic</category>
		<category>television</category>
		<category>timelord</category>
		<dc:creator>Artifice_Eternity</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>&apos;24&apos;. Violent content.  Complaint not upheld.</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/28646/24%2DViolent%2Dcontent%2DComplaint%2Dnot%2Dupheld</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.bsc.org.uk/pdfs/bulletin/bulletin68.pdf"&gt;&apos;24&apos;. Violent content.  Complaint not upheld.&lt;/a&gt; The British Standards Council (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bsc.org.uk/&quot;&gt;BSC&lt;/a&gt;) publish their findings on a regular basis, as they explain which complaints by members of the public regarding the &apos;offensive&apos; content of some programmes on TV and radio have been upheld or not.  This is fascinating for two reasons -- we get to see what people actually moan about and also how the various stations have to justify their output -- some seem more successful at it than others... [pdf format file via &lt;a href=&quot;http://whedonesque.com/?comments=2100&quot;&gt;Whedonesque&lt;/a&gt;]  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.28646</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2003 15:38:59 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>24</category>
		<category>BritishTelevision</category>
		<category>BritishTV</category>
		<category>BroadcastingStandardsCommission</category>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>BSC</category>
		<category>telly</category>
		<dc:creator>feelinglistless</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/15930/</link>
		<description> I&apos;ve always had a love hate relationship with &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.channel4.com/entertainment/tv/microsites/B/bigbreakfast/&quot;&gt;The Big Breakfast&lt;/a&gt;.  But now that &lt;a href=&quot;http://news.bbc.co.uk/hi/english/entertainment/tv_and_radio/newsid_1899000/1899152.stm&quot;&gt;it&apos;s come to the end&lt;/a&gt; of a ten year run I think something will be missing in the morning -- it offered something different to the slow newscasting on the BBC and the slow presenters on GMtv.  The show went out with a characteristic flourish, not only with &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.mtv.com/news/articles/1453110/20020327/spears_britney.jhtml?headlines=true&quot;&gt;this mad scoop on Britney Spears&lt;/a&gt;, but also by dumping &lt;a href=&quot;http://news.independent.co.uk/uk/media/story.jsp?story=279942&quot;&gt;a giant garden gnome outside Channel 4 offices&lt;/a&gt;, it&apos;s hand remodelled to give a &apos;v&apos; sign to the bosses who wielded the axe.  Goodbye, you beauty.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.15930</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Mar 2002 15:37:41 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>britain</category>
		<category>britishtelevision</category>
		<category>obit</category>
		<category>television</category>
		<category>thebigbreakfast</category>
		<dc:creator>feelinglistless</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


