<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with BrokenLink and media</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/BrokenLink+media</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'BrokenLink' and 'media' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 21 Apr 2005 22:14:12 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 Apr 2005 22:14:12 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>Alternate Reality Advertising?</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/41427/Alternate%2DReality%2DAdvertising</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.audiusa.com/shared/a3_microsite/html/a3_microsite_vin.html"&gt;Alternate Reality Advertising?&lt;/a&gt; I noticed this peculiar advert on this morning&apos;s commute.  Seems it&apos;s part of an &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.stolena3.com/archives/001176.html&quot;&gt;immersive ad campaign.&lt;/a&gt;  Since when do &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.unfiction.com/history/&quot;&gt;gamers&lt;/a&gt; have enough money to buy luxury rides?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2005:site.41427</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Apr 2005 22:14:12 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>advertising</category>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>media</category>
		<category>pr</category>
		<category>publicrelations</category>
		<dc:creator>gnutron</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>More to the story?</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/39513/More%2Dto%2Dthe%2Dstory</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://rigorousintuition.blogspot.com/2005/02/stirring-white-house-honey-pot.html"&gt;More to the story?&lt;/a&gt; So what are the chances that the whole &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nytimes.com/2005/02/11/politics/11gannon.html?&quot;&gt;Jeff Gannon/Jim Guckert thing&lt;/a&gt; is about more than partisan media manipulation?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2005:site.39513</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Feb 2005 09:58:47 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>JamesGuckert</category>
		<category>JeffGannon</category>
		<category>journalism</category>
		<category>media</category>
		<category>NYTimes</category>
		<dc:creator>kgasmart</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Easy ways to improve Men&apos;s Magazines.</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/39079/Easy%2Dways%2Dto%2Dimprove%2DMens%2DMagazines</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.nationallampoon.com/nl/03_voices/mensmags/mensmags.asp"&gt;Easy ways to improve Men&apos;s Magazines.&lt;/a&gt; Ever notice that the content in men&apos;s magazines such as &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.gq.com&quot;&gt;GQ&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.menshealth.com&quot;&gt;Men&apos;s Health&lt;/a&gt; seems a bit vapid? Perhaps they could learn a thing or two from &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nationallampoon.com/nl/03_voices/mensmags/mensmags.asp&quot;&gt;this list&lt;/a&gt; of suggested additions. More sharks, less cologne ads. Sounds better already, doesn&apos;t it? Now if only they could have &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0000230/&quot;&gt;Stallone&lt;/a&gt; personally deliver the copies to my door. Looks like he could use the work anyway.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2005:site.39079</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Jan 2005 09:44:32 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>magazines</category>
		<category>media</category>
		<category>men</category>
		<dc:creator>kingmissile</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Apologevents: The Next Big Thing</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/37042/Apologevents%2DThe%2DNext%2DBig%2DThing</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.blogmaverick.com/entry/1234000897020769/"&gt;Apologevents&lt;/a&gt; Cuban says &quot;Please make me apologize&#8230; The FCC as Marketing Partner&quot; and he hits on the latest network trick.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2004:site.37042</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Nov 2004 20:37:11 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>apology</category>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>FCC</category>
		<category>MarkCuban</category>
		<category>media</category>
		<category>NBA</category>
		<category>sports</category>
		<dc:creator>billsaysthis</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Lucire enters the real world</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/33405/Lucire%2Denters%2Dthe%2Dreal%2Dworld</link>
		<description> &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.lucire.com/2004a/0516ll0.shtml&quot;&gt;Lucire the fashion website becomes the next website to go real world with a magazine in newsagents.&lt;/a&gt;  It&apos;s not the first (see &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.chud.com/&quot;&gt;Chud&lt;/a&gt; which publishes &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.livepublishing.co.uk/content/movieinsider.shtml&quot;&gt;Movie Insider&lt;/a&gt;) but they&apos;ve taken the step of putting the prototype May issue online in .pdf format and are asking readers for their input.  How well can they do in an already crowded market place and is it significantly different for us to care?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2004:site.33405</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 May 2004 14:58:19 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>fashion</category>
		<category>Lucire</category>
		<category>magazine</category>
		<category>media</category>
		<category>NewZealand</category>
		<dc:creator>feelinglistless</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Nippallujah</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/32197/Nippallujah</link>
		<description> Start saving for your childrens future therapy. What they learned this month is dead bodies being burnt and strung up on a bridge is &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.boston.com/dailynews/092/nation/U_S_newspapers_publish_graphic:.shtml&quot;&gt;ok to print on the front page of a newspaper&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.baltimoresun.com/entertainment/tv/bal-to.media02apr02,0,2913686.column?coll=bal-tv-utility&quot;&gt;and watch on the news &lt;/a&gt;at dinner time; but &lt;a href=&quot;http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DOC-243462A1.pdf&quot;&gt;you better not see any nipple&lt;/a&gt;, even for a half a second.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2004:site.32197</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Apr 2004 08:36:30 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>broadcast</category>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>fcc</category>
		<category>media</category>
		<category>news</category>
		<category>sex</category>
		<category>standards</category>
		<category>superbowl</category>
		<category>tv</category>
		<category>violence</category>
		<category>wardrobemalfunction</category>
		<dc:creator>CrazyJub</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Simpsons stars strike for more &apos;D&apos;oh!&apos;</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/32173/Simpsons%2Dstars%2Dstrike%2Dfor%2Dmore%2DDoh</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://msnbc.msn.com/id/4645435/"&gt;Simpson stars strike for more &apos;D&apos;oh!&apos;&lt;/a&gt; The voices of the Simpsons are on strike for $360,000 an episode. Seems almost reasonable for such a pop culture phenomenon, but the voiceover work equates to one work day per episode.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2004:site.32173</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Apr 2004 09:43:30 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>contract</category>
		<category>media</category>
		<category>strike</category>
		<category>television</category>
		<category>TheSimpsons</category>
		<category>TV</category>
		<category>voiceactors</category>
		<dc:creator>BurnedEve</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Colonel Angus Chicken!</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/31668/Colonel%2DAngus%2DChicken</link>
		<description> News 14 in North Carolina had an online system where people could post school closings, etc that would scroll on the screen.  The postings all got reviewed before they went live, but after they&#8217;d been reviewed/approved, the system was open for the original poster to go back and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.securityfocus.org/news/8191&quot;&gt;change the copy&lt;/a&gt;, so you could essentially submit something benign, then go back and monkey with it.  &lt;a href=&quot;http://www4.ncsu.edu/~smheath/news14.html&quot;&gt;Screen shots of the results&lt;/a&gt;.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2004:site.31668</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2004 09:29:09 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>hacking</category>
		<category>media</category>
		<category>news14</category>
		<dc:creator>jonson</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Get on the bandwagon!</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/31411/Get%2Don%2Dthe%2Dbandwagon</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.skyterrain.net/median/music.html"&gt;Median&apos;s Relief!&lt;/a&gt; If you like &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/mefi/30979&quot;&gt;Little Brother&lt;/a&gt;, you should like these three free mp3&apos;s from Median.  He&apos;s in the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.netweed.com/nchiphop/justusleague/&quot;&gt;Justus League&lt;/a&gt; too and he&apos;s got beats from &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.therapchamber.com/9thwonder.htm&quot;&gt;9th Wonder&lt;/a&gt;, hip hop producer of the moment right now.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2004:site.31411</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2004 14:03:39 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>free</category>
		<category>LittleBrother</category>
		<category>Media</category>
		<category>mp3</category>
		<category>mp3s</category>
		<category>music</category>
		<dc:creator>Slimemonster</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>The best PR ends up looking like news. You never know when a PR agency</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/30706/The%2Dbest%2DPR%2Dends%2Dup%2Dlooking%2Dlike%2Dnews%2DYou%2Dnever%2Dknow%2Dwhen%2Da%2DPR%2Dagency</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2004/01/13/dean_media/"&gt;&quot;The Media vs. Howard Dean.&quot;&lt;/a&gt; Salon (subscription or Flash ad viewing required) observes that the media have been doing everything in their power to attach negative labels to US presidential candidate Howard Dean. Will the adage that &quot;there&apos;s no such thing as bad publicity&quot; prevail? Meanwhile, the Internet is increasing in relevance as a &lt;a href=&quot;http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&amp;u=/ap/20040111/ap_on_el_pr/media_politics&quot;&gt;news source&lt;/a&gt;, according to a recent survey. Which websites do you peruse for political coverage, if any?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2004:site.30706</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2004 10:03:56 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>election</category>
		<category>HowardDean</category>
		<category>media</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>publicity</category>
		<category>salon</category>
		<category>USA</category>
		<dc:creator>Eloquence</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Dead and gone.</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/29125/Dead%2Dand%2Dgone</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.msnbc.com/news/981889.asp?0cv=KB20"&gt;Dying for your country no longer warrants a picture in the paper.&lt;/a&gt; Ban on pictures of the coffins of soliders killed in Iraq.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.29125</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2003 08:58:44 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>blackout</category>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>censorship</category>
		<category>coffins</category>
		<category>Iraq</category>
		<category>IraqWar</category>
		<category>media</category>
		<category>Newsweek</category>
		<category>photos</category>
		<category>War</category>
		<category>WarDead</category>
		<dc:creator>spazzm</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>It&apos;s leaking all over my democracy</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/28997/Its%2Dleaking%2Dall%2Dover%2Dmy%2Ddemocracy</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.philly.com/mld/inquirer/news/nation/7023679.htm"&gt;Bush orders officials to stop the leaks.&lt;/a&gt; News of Bush&apos;s order leaked almost immediately.  And speaking of leaks, two U.S. officials are the primary sources of information about &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/c/a/2003/10/12/MN304430.DTL&quot;&gt;Israel&apos;s Harpoon cruise &lt;/a&gt;missiles &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/348730.html&quot;&gt;which may or may not be used to attack Iran&lt;/a&gt;.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.28997</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2003 14:16:21 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>Bush</category>
		<category>GeorgeBush</category>
		<category>government</category>
		<category>GWB</category>
		<category>journalism</category>
		<category>leaks</category>
		<category>media</category>
		<category>USA</category>
		<dc:creator>dejah420</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Big FCC rollback vote this Tuesday.</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/28316/Big%2DFCC%2Drollback%2Dvote%2Dthis%2DTuesday</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.mediareform.net/dorganlott911.htm"&gt;Big FCC rollback vote this Tuesday.&lt;/a&gt; I know a lot of mefites are passionate about this issue and it looks like Senators Byron Dorgan (D&#8211;ND) and Trent Lott (R-MS) are doing something about it.  &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.aclu.org/FreeSpeech/FreeSpeech.cfm?ID=12720&amp;c=42&quot;&gt;More info, free faxes, etc at the ACLU.&lt;/a&gt;  &lt;a href=&quot;http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d108:s.j.res.00017:&quot;&gt;Read S.J. res 17 here.&lt;/a&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.28316</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2003 13:24:52 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>ACLU</category>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>FCC</category>
		<category>government</category>
		<category>law</category>
		<category>media</category>
		<category>ownership</category>
		<category>radio</category>
		<category>senate</category>
		<category>USA</category>
		<dc:creator>skallas</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Hey buddy. Everything costs. You a communiss or something?....</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/27476/Hey%2Dbuddy%2DEverything%2Dcosts%2DYou%2Da%2Dcommuniss%2Dor%2Dsomething</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.tompaine.com/feature2.cfm/ID/8528"&gt;Future of the Net: &quot;Information wants to be free&quot; vs. &quot;truth costs extra&quot;&lt;/a&gt; &quot;...a coalition that included Amazon.com, Microsoft, Yahoo, Apple, Disney and others....spoke of &quot;tiered&quot; service, where consumers would be charged according to &quot;gold, silver and bronze&quot; levels of bandwidth use. The days where lawmakers once spoke about eradicating the &quot;Digital Divide&quot; in America has come full circle. Under the scenario presented by the lobbyists, people on fixed incomes would have to accept a stripped-down Internet, full of personally targeted advertising. Other users could get a price break if they receive bundled content -- news, music, games -- from one telecom or media company. &lt;b&gt;Anybody interested in other &quot;non-mainstream&quot; news, software or higher-volume usage, could pay for the privilege&lt;/b&gt;. The panel&apos;s response was warm, suggesting that the industry should work this out with little federal intrusion. That approach has already been embraced by the industry-friendly Federal Communications Commission.&quot; For more, see &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.democraticmedia.org/&quot;&gt;The Center For Digital Democracy&lt;/a&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.27476</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2003 12:41:05 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>control</category>
		<category>DigitalDemocracy</category>
		<category>freedom</category>
		<category>internet</category>
		<category>media</category>
		<category>service</category>
		<category>tiered</category>
		<dc:creator>troutfishing</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Antitrust Time?</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/26171/Antitrust%2DTime</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.thenation.com/special/bigten.html"&gt;The Big Ten Media Corporations&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.clearchannel.com/&quot;&gt;Clear Channel Communications&lt;/a&gt; control most of the major media already.  This includes print media, film archives, movie and television production, and the largest Internet Service and News Provider.
Right now is the argument is to prevent further consolidation.  But should it instead be to break up these mega-corporations instead?  Should &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.usdoj.gov/atr/&quot;&gt;anti-trust&lt;/a&gt; law cover &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.quickmba.com/strategy/horizontal-integration/&quot;&gt;horizontal&lt;/a&gt; as well as &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.quickmba.com/strategy/vertical-integration/&quot;&gt;vertical&lt;/a&gt; market (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.wga.org/pr/0102/integration.htm&quot;&gt; and&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.fairjobs.org/fairjobs/contingent/cwffe_newecon.php&quot;&gt;employee&lt;/a&gt;) domination?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.26171</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2003 17:15:39 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>antitrust</category>
		<category>BigTen</category>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>ClearChannel</category>
		<category>law</category>
		<category>media</category>
		<category>USA</category>
		<dc:creator>kablam</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Wipe that fucking smirk off your face you fat crooked bastard!</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/26146/Wipe%2Dthat%2Dfucking%2Dsmirk%2Doff%2Dyour%2Dface%2Dyou%2Dfat%2Dcrooked%2Dbastard</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://money.cnn.com/2003/06/02/news/companies/fcc_senate.reut/"&gt;Senators seek to reverse FCC ruling&lt;/a&gt; A &lt;strong&gt;bipartisan&lt;/strong&gt; coalition of Senators intends to overturn the &lt;a href=&quot;http://reuters.com/financeNewsArticle.jhtml?type=governmentFilingsNews&amp;storyID=2865788&quot;&gt;FCC&apos;s latest decree &lt;/a&gt;ordering greater &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cjr.org/owners/&quot;&gt;corporate media consolidation.&lt;/a&gt;   &lt;em&gt;&quot;I&apos;m convinced, just noodling around, that we can get a majority vote and report that out (of committee) and get some action on the floor of the Senate,&quot; Hollings told reporters.&lt;/em&gt;  Anyone else surprised?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.26146</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2003 17:07:07 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>business</category>
		<category>fcc</category>
		<category>media</category>
		<dc:creator>Ignatius J. Reilly</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Fox News Biased? Pish Tosh!</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/25642/Fox%2DNews%2DBiased%2DPish%2DTosh</link>
		<description> Ok, I&apos;m biased. I admit it. I never pass over the chance to gloat or take delight in some misfortune that befalls Rupert Murdoch or his media empire (this is, after all the man who &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.tibet.ca/wtnarchive/1999/9/7_5.html&quot;&gt;disses the Dalai Lama&lt;/a&gt;.)&lt;br&gt;
So it is with great and admittied delight that I announce that the Fox News Channel (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.onlinejournal.com/Media/031303Varolli/031303varolli.html&quot;&gt;which has fought for and won the right to lie to it&apos;s viewers&lt;/a&gt;) may be &lt;a href=&quot;http://media.guardian.co.uk/rupertmurdoch/story/0,11136,951272,00.html&quot;&gt;stopped from broadcasting in the UK because of it&apos;s bias&lt;/a&gt; (such a thing has happened before.)&lt;br&gt;
&lt;small&gt;&lt;small&gt;~fingers crossed~&lt;/small&gt;&lt;/small&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.25642</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2003 23:45:21 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>bias</category>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>FOXnews</category>
		<category>Guardian</category>
		<category>impartiality</category>
		<category>media</category>
		<category>OnlineJournal</category>
		<category>RupertMurdoch</category>
		<category>TheGuardian</category>
		<dc:creator>Blue Stone</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Nude Scientist</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/24853/Nude%2DScientist</link>
		<description> &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.newscientist.com/opinion/opfeedback.jsp?id=ns238999#23&quot;&gt;This &apos;news&apos;... &lt;i&gt;it vibrates&lt;/i&gt;?&lt;/a&gt; Yes, more than six months after it appeared &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/mefi/19762&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt; on MeFi, New Scientist has just found out about the vibrating broom. I can feel my confidence in them dripping away...  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.24853</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2003 14:55:26 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>HarryPotter</category>
		<category>media</category>
		<category>meme</category>
		<category>NewScientist</category>
		<dc:creator>twine42</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Not All Iraqis Dancing in the Streets.</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/24544/Not%2DAll%2DIraqis%2DDancing%2Din%2Dthe%2DStreets</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://abcnews.go.com/sections/wnt/World/iraq_safwan030322.html"&gt;Not All Iraqis Dancing in the Streets.&lt;/a&gt; To watch the &lt;strike&gt;neutered&lt;/strike&gt; embedded reporters, you would think that every Iraqi is overjoyed to see America in his or her country. But the reality seems to be quite different: &quot;Why are you here in this country? Are you trying to take over? Are you going to take our country forever? Are the Israelis coming next? Are you here to steal our oil? When are you going to get out?&quot;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.24544</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Mar 2003 22:50:45 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>iraq</category>
		<category>media</category>
		<category>news</category>
		<category>reporters</category>
		<category>reporting</category>
		<category>war</category>
		<dc:creator>owillis</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>You may not read Arabic, but the pictures speak for themselves.</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/24541/You%2Dmay%2Dnot%2Dread%2DArabic%2Dbut%2Dthe%2Dpictures%2Dspeak%2Dfor%2Dthemselves</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.aljezira.net/news/arabic/2003/3/3-23-5.htm"&gt;You may not read Arabic, but do the pictures speak for themselves? [warning: graphic images]&lt;/a&gt; One big difference between Desert Storm and the current operation is the emergence of Gulf satellite news stations such as &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.aljezira.net/&quot;&gt;Al-Jazeera&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.emi.co.ae/television/adtv/&quot;&gt;Abu Dhabi TV&lt;/a&gt;, beaming live into homes &lt;a href=&quot;http://cnews.canoe.ca/CNEWS/MediaNews/2003/03/22/48878-ap.html&quot;&gt;across the Arab world&lt;/a&gt;. Questions of access aside, it&apos;s a given that these news sources will be broadcasting materials that  inflame opinion, and would never get past the &apos;taste and decency&apos; rules of British or American stations. Trouble is, most westerners don&apos;t &lt;a href=&quot;http://tarjim.ajeeb.com/ajeeb/default.asp?lang=1&quot;&gt;read Arabic&lt;/a&gt;: so, should we be bookmarking such sources for another perspective?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.24541</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Mar 2003 18:36:52 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>AlJazeera</category>
		<category>arabic</category>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>coverage</category>
		<category>Iraq</category>
		<category>Iraqwar</category>
		<category>media</category>
		<category>reportage</category>
		<category>War</category>
		<dc:creator>riviera</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>ABC&apos;s</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/24189/ABCs</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://abcnews.go.com/sections/politics/DailyNews/TheNote.html"&gt;ABC&apos;s blog &quot;The Note&quot; suspends operations,&lt;/a&gt; citing lack of resources needed for war coverage, the blog&apos;s humorous style not being &quot;the right national tonic,&quot; and this shocker: &quot;We suspect that the amount of strictly political news &#8212; the kind of stuff that is the meat and starch of The Note &#8212; is likely to dramatically decrease in the coming days.&quot; &lt;b&gt;GUH?&lt;/b&gt; Aren&apos;t blogs now more important than ever? Aren&apos;t &lt;i&gt;politics&lt;/i&gt; now more important than ever? What message is being sent by the mainstream media here? (Via the indispensable &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A7602-2003Mar10.html&quot;&gt;Lloyd Grove&lt;/a&gt; of the Washington Post.)  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.24189</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2003 07:00:21 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>ABC</category>
		<category>blog</category>
		<category>blogging</category>
		<category>blogs</category>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>media</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>TheNote</category>
		<category>WaPo</category>
		<category>war</category>
		<category>WashingtonPost</category>
		<dc:creator>PrinceValium</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Professional opinion aggregation</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/24058/Professional%2Dopinion%2Daggregation</link>
		<description> Like Slate&#8217;s &lt;a href=&quot;http://slate.msn.com/id/2079659/&quot;&gt;International Papers&lt;/a&gt;, the US Department of State collects &lt;a href=&quot;http://usinfo.state.gov/products/medreac.htm&quot;&gt;foreign media reaction&lt;/a&gt; to a policy or event. Instead of blatant propagandizing (like some other State Department pages) there is simply a lot of useful translation and short descriptions of the newspapers.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.24058</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Mar 2003 23:00:25 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>media</category>
		<category>usdepartmentofstate</category>
		<dc:creator>raaka</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Media Scumbags</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/23318/Media%2DScumbags</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://apnews1.iwon.com//article/20030204/D7P02F201.html"&gt;CNN Wins Ratings for Shuttle Coverage&lt;/a&gt; Despite the absence of chief anchor Aaron Brown, CNN scored a significant ratings victory over rival Fox News Channel on Saturday when the space shuttle Columbia disintegrated

Reading that immediately reminds me of what I hate about the news media.  
One can only imagine how they are salivating over the pending Iraq situation.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.23318</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Feb 2003 16:42:44 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>CNN</category>
		<category>coverage</category>
		<category>FoxNews</category>
		<category>media</category>
		<category>news</category>
		<category>scumbags</category>
		<dc:creator>a3matrix</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>The right question</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/22807/The%2Dright%2Dquestion</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.startribune.com/stories/1519/3583878.html"&gt;Less advertising, more national and international news.&lt;/a&gt; Star Tribune editor Anders Gyllenhaal writes, &quot;How can we improve coverage in big and small ways?&quot;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.22807</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jan 2003 09:46:15 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>AndersGyllenhall</category>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>journalism</category>
		<category>media</category>
		<category>newspaper</category>
		<category>StarTribune</category>
		<dc:creator>zedzebedia</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>The Massey Lectures</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/21940/The%2DMassey%2DLectures</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://masseylectures.cbc.ca/"&gt;The Massey Lectures&lt;/a&gt; are the CBC&apos;s annual effort to give exposure to eminent minds working on &apos;big ideas&apos; in the realm of social criticism. This year&apos;s lecturer, Margaret Visser, undertakes a very engaging attempt to explain and undermine fatalism. The site links to transcripts and audio files of some past lectures. Some Canadian book-learnin&apos; for those of you who aren&apos;t sleepily digesting your Thanksgiving turkey!  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.21940</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Nov 2002 11:02:59 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>audio</category>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>Canada</category>
		<category>CBC</category>
		<category>MargaretVisser</category>
		<category>Massey</category>
		<category>MasseyLectures</category>
		<category>media</category>
		<category>transcripts</category>
		<dc:creator>stonerose</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


