<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with Budget and Bush</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/Budget+Bush</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'Budget' and 'Bush' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2006 11:48:13 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2006 11:48:13 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>No Libraries Left Behind</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/49282/No%2DLibraries%2DLeft%2DBehind</link>
		<description> &quot;How are EPA scientists supposed to engage in cutting edge research when they cannot find what the agency has already done?&quot; Good question. As &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/mefi/45452&quot;&gt;noted&lt;/a&gt; in an earlier post, the EPA is one of the agencies that is facing cuts to finance BushCo&apos;s America. How? &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.peer.org/news/news_id.php?row_id=643&quot;&gt;By shutting down its network of libraries and its electronic catalogue&lt;/a&gt;.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2006:site.49282</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2006 11:48:13 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>Budget</category>
		<category>Bush</category>
		<category>Environment</category>
		<category>EPA</category>
		<category>Libraries</category>
		<category>Research</category>
		<dc:creator>327.ca</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>The moderate, conservative, and neoconservative estimates of the cost of the war on Iraq</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/48122/The%2Dmoderate%2Dconservative%2Dand%2Dneoconservative%2Destimates%2Dof%2Dthe%2Dcost%2Dof%2Dthe%2Dwar%2Don%2DIraq</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www2.gsb.columbia.edu/faculty/jstiglitz/Cost_of_War_in_Iraq.htm"&gt;What is the cost of the war on Iraq?&lt;/a&gt; &lt;small&gt;[more inside]&lt;/small&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2006:site.48122</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jan 2006 20:40:34 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>bilmes</category>
		<category>budget</category>
		<category>bush</category>
		<category>cheney</category>
		<category>congress</category>
		<category>costs</category>
		<category>defense</category>
		<category>iraq</category>
		<category>rumsfeld</category>
		<category>stiglitz</category>
		<category>war</category>
		<category>waronterror</category>
		<category>whitehouse</category>
		<category>wolfowitz</category>
		<dc:creator>edverb</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Accountability? We don&apos;t need no stinkin&apos; accountability!</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/28403/Accountability%2DWe%2Ddont%2Dneed%2Dno%2Dstinkin%2Daccountability</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.boston.com/dailynews/261/region/Kennedy_criticizes_decision_to:.shtml"&gt;Where is our money going?&lt;/a&gt; According to the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cbo.gov/&quot;&gt;Congressional Budget Office&lt;/a&gt;, not only is the Bush administration asking for 87 billion dollars to cover Iraqi reconstruction, but &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.boston.com/dailynews/261/region/Kennedy_criticizes_decision_to:.shtml&quot;&gt;they&apos;re also unable to account for 2.5 billion of the 4 billion dollars&lt;/a&gt; that they&apos;re spending per month in Iraq.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.28403</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2003 14:37:10 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>Accountability</category>
		<category>Budget</category>
		<category>Bush</category>
		<category>CongressionalBudgetOffice</category>
		<category>Iraq</category>
		<category>Spending</category>
		<dc:creator>bshort</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Tax Cut? You&apos;re Soaking In It!</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/26035/Tax%2DCut%2DYoure%2DSoaking%2DIn%2DIt</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://news.ft.com/servlet/ContentServer?pagename=FT.com/StoryFT/FullStory&amp;amp;c=StoryFT&amp;amp;cid=1051390392975&amp;amp;p=1012571727088"&gt;Quick, Hide The Body!&lt;/a&gt; &quot;...But the Bush administration chose to keep the findings out of the annual budget report for fiscal year 2004, published in February, as the White House campaigned for a tax-cut package that critics claim will expand future deficits.

The study asserts that sharp tax increases, massive spending cuts or a painful mix of both are unavoidable if the US is to meet benefit promises to future generations. It estimates that closing the gap would require the equivalent of an immediate and permanent 66 per cent across-the-board income tax increase.&quot;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.26035</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2003 19:10:56 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>2004</category>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>budget</category>
		<category>bush</category>
		<category>economy</category>
		<category>taxes</category>
		<dc:creator>owillis</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/14111/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.cnn.com/2002/ALLPOLITICS/01/23/budget.ap/index.html"&gt;Bush Proposes to Add $48 Billion to Pentagon&apos;s Budget Next Year.&lt;/a&gt; Is this where all of this money should be going?  Personally, I would have liked to have seen Bush make good on his promise to help New York.  Besides, I&apos;ve already lived through the Eighties.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.14111</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2002 14:33:52 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>Budget</category>
		<category>Bush</category>
		<category>GeorgeWBush</category>
		<category>GWB</category>
		<category>Pentagon</category>
		<dc:creator>xammerboy</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/6875/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.cnn.com/2001/ALLPOLITICS/04/09/bush.budget.02/index.html"&gt;Our air and water may be polluted, but by gum, we&apos;re going to have smart kids...&lt;/a&gt; Bush gives us the new budget, which gives money to Education and the military, but cuts back on Agriculture and the EPA. Guess we&apos;re all going to be chewing down on that synthetic corn while wearing gas masks, eh?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.6875</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Apr 2001 12:15:52 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>2002</category>
		<category>agriculture</category>
		<category>budget</category>
		<category>bush</category>
		<category>education</category>
		<category>epa</category>
		<category>military</category>
		<dc:creator>Cavatica</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/6594/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/briefings/20010326.html"&gt;Bush seeks support from Silicon Valley leaders for tax plan.&lt;/a&gt; &quot;I haven&apos;t seen the list of attendees yet, but it&apos;s for the purpose of building support for the President&apos;s budget and tax plan, for the vital group of the economy that&apos;s kept our economy strong.  If there&apos;s any group that has its finger on the pulse of the economy, it&apos;s the high tech community, and the President wants to hear their thoughts about the strength of the economy and to share with them his ideas for how to improve it.&quot; 
&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;
Yeah, but what about the PEOPLE? Shouldn&apos;t WE be asked about the tax plan?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.6594</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2001 09:11:33 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>budget</category>
		<category>bush</category>
		<category>siliconvalley</category>
		<category>taxes</category>
		<dc:creator>bkdelong</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


