<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with Budget and USA</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/Budget+USA</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'Budget' and 'USA' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 10:32:05 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 10:32:05 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>Balancing the Budget is just sliders and buttons</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/83034/Balancing%2Dthe%2DBudget%2Dis%2Djust%2Dsliders%2Dand%2Dbuttons</link>
		<description> The current federal and state budget woes have lead many to create their ideal budgets to keep it all in balance, and now you can try your hand at the push and pull of budgets large and larger. You can be a nation-wide &lt;a href=&quot;http://marketplace.publicradio.org/features/budget_hero/&quot;&gt;budget hero&lt;/a&gt; (toggle-able music) at Marketplace for American Media. The LA Times makes the California budget into buttons, where you can &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-statebudget-fl-2,0,6957202.htmlstory&quot;&gt;add and subtract whole segments of the budget&lt;/a&gt; in a quick-and-dirty attempt at making things even out. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.next-ten.org/&quot;&gt;Next 10&lt;/a&gt; have &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2005/04/25/BAGOBCEEMJ1.DTL&quot;&gt;created a more detailed budgeting system&lt;/a&gt; in their &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nextten.org/budgettool/site/thesim/flashcheck.html&quot;&gt;California budget simulator&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.oaklandbudgetchallenge.com/&quot;&gt;localized Oakland variation&lt;/a&gt;. Too much information to handle? &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.recordnet.com/apps/pbcs.dll/section?Category=A_SPECIAL026701&quot;&gt;Stockton&apos;s budget balancing options&lt;/a&gt; cover police, fire community service and public works, with sliding scales of money to spend on each.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2009:site.83034</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 10:32:05 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>Balance</category>
		<category>BalancedBudget</category>
		<category>Budget</category>
		<category>California</category>
		<category>Flash</category>
		<category>FlashMonday</category>
		<category>Games</category>
		<category>Oakland</category>
		<category>Simulation</category>
		<category>Stockton</category>
		<category>USA</category>
		<dc:creator>filthy light thief</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>New Poll: Public Would Significantly Alter Administration&apos;s Budget</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/40281/New%2DPoll%2DPublic%2DWould%2DSignificantly%2DAlter%2DAdministrations%2DBudget</link>
		<description> A new poll finds that the American public would significantly alter the Bush administration&#8217;s recently proposed federal budget. Presented a breakdown of the major areas of the proposed discretionary budget and given the opportunity to redistribute it, respondents made major changes. The most dramatic changes were deep cuts in defense spending, a significant reallocation toward deficit reduction, and increases in spending on education, job training, reducing reliance on oil, and veterans. These changes were favored by both Republicans and Democrats, though the changes were generally greater for Democrats.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pipa.org/OnlineReports/budget/030705/html/more_03_07_05.html#1&quot; title=&quot;The American public as a whole takes a fairly coherent position. They favor redirecting a portion of defense spending to deficit reduction and social spending and look for savings by cutting spending on large-scale Cold War style capabilities--not unlike Secretary of Defense Rumsfeld&#8212;and sizing capabilities on the assumption that the US will be acting together with allies, not on its own.&quot;&gt;What America Gets  Right&lt;/a&gt; (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pipa.org/OnlineReports/budget/030705/Report03_07_05.pdf&quot;&gt;pdf&lt;/a&gt;) via &lt;small&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://gadflyer.com/flytrap/index.php?Week=200510#1584&quot;&gt;The Gadflyer&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/small&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2005:site.40281</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Mar 2005 12:53:11 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>AmericanPolitics</category>
		<category>budget</category>
		<category>budgets</category>
		<category>opinionpolls</category>
		<category>polls</category>
		<category>publicopinion</category>
		<category>USA</category>
		<category>USbudget</category>
		<category>USpolitics</category>
		<dc:creator>y2karl</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Death and Taxes</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/38329/Death%2Dand%2DTaxes</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.deviantart.com/view/9410862/"&gt;Death and Taxes: A Visual Look at Where Your (U.S.) Tax Dollars Go&lt;/a&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2005:site.38329</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Jan 2005 20:19:34 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>budget</category>
		<category>BudgetGraph</category>
		<category>DeathAndTaxes</category>
		<category>government</category>
		<category>graph</category>
		<category>spending</category>
		<category>taxes</category>
		<category>USA</category>
		<dc:creator>Space Coyote</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Political Fratricide</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/24794/Political%2DFratricide</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.vaiw.org/vet/modules.php?op=modload&amp;amp;name=News&amp;amp;file=article&amp;amp;sid=59&amp;amp;mode=thread&amp;amp;order=0&amp;amp;thold=0"&gt;Political Fratricide:&lt;/a&gt; The GOP is reportedly [&lt;a href=&quot;http://web.morons.org/article.jsp?sectionid=8&amp;id=2987&quot;&gt;+&lt;/a&gt;] proposing $15 billion of cuts &#8212; or is it $25? &#8212; in veterans&apos; benefits between now and 2007, and groups like the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.vaiw.org/vet/index.php&quot;&gt;Veterans Against the Iraq War&lt;/a&gt; are hopping mad.  Hell, I imagine the pro-war wing is pretty peeved, too. It&apos;s part of a plan &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.prospect.org/print-friendly/webfeatures/2003/03/kuttner-r-03-27.html&quot;&gt;with delusions of grandeur&lt;/a&gt; to deliver massive tax cuts AND kill the deficit ... you know, the one that did not exist before W was elected, as I understand it ... in six years.  The original tip is from &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nowarblog.org/archives/001245.html&quot;&gt;Stand Down&lt;/a&gt;. The actual status of the cuts is nebulous at this point, however, with the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/news/archive/2003/03/25/national0150EST0447.DTL&quot;&gt;SF Chron&lt;/a&gt; reporting that they will likely fail in the Senate as the tax cut is halved and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.denverpost.com/Stories/0,1413,36%257E64%257E1284042%257E,00.html&quot;&gt;others&lt;/a&gt; reporting that the die is not yet cast. The House budget resolution, for metafilter accountants who like these things, is &lt;a href=&quot;http://frwebgate.access.gpo.gov/cgi-bin/getdoc.cgi?dbname=108_cong_reports&amp;docid=f:hr037.108&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.24794</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2003 23:38:59 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>budget</category>
		<category>deficit</category>
		<category>funding</category>
		<category>GOP</category>
		<category>government</category>
		<category>healthcare</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>Republicans</category>
		<category>spending</category>
		<category>taxcuts</category>
		<category>USA</category>
		<category>VA</category>
		<category>veterans</category>
		<dc:creator>hairyeyeball</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Budget game</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/23957/Budget%2Dgame</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.budgetsim.org/nbs/"&gt;National Budget Simulation&lt;/a&gt; Think Washington is doing a poor job of allocating funds?  See if you can eliminate the deficit with &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.budgetsim.org/nbs/&quot;&gt;this little game&lt;/a&gt;.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.23957</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Feb 2003 17:13:52 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>budget</category>
		<category>economics</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>simulations</category>
		<category>usa</category>
		<dc:creator>synecdoche</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>military pay raises</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/22498/military%2Dpay%2Draises</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.estripes.com/article.asp?section=104&amp;amp;article=11655&amp;amp;archive=true"&gt;&quot;Hang in there, help is on the way.&quot;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;i&gt;The director of the White House Office of Management and Budget, Mitchell E. Daniels Jr., recently asked the Defense Department to lower the 2004 pay raise from its expected 3.7 percent to 2 percent. Daniels also wants future raises tied to inflation, rather than basing boosts on what civilians doing comparable jobs in the private sector might make.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;

Many of our military families already qualify for welfare and food stamps.  Pay raises are out of the question when there&apos;s NMD and tax cuts to the wealthy needing funding.

 </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.22498</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Dec 2002 07:51:22 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>budget</category>
		<category>government</category>
		<category>military</category>
		<category>pay</category>
		<category>salary</category>
		<category>spending</category>
		<category>USA</category>
		<dc:creator>nofundy</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/18619/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.thenation.com/doc.mhtml?i=20020715&amp;amp;s=klare"&gt;The pursuit of permanent military supremacy.&lt;/a&gt; &quot;The question facing all Americans, therefore, is whether the expenditure of hundreds (later thousands) of billions of dollars to defend against hypothetical enemies that may not arise until thirty or forty years from now is a sensible precaution, as contended by the President and Defense Secretary, or whether it eventually will undermine US security by siphoning off funds from vital health and educational programs and by creating a global environment of fear and hostility that will produce exactly the opposite of what is intended by all these expenditures.&quot;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.18619</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jul 2002 13:06:55 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>budget</category>
		<category>defense</category>
		<category>federalbudget</category>
		<category>military</category>
		<category>unitedstates</category>
		<category>usa</category>
		<category>usbudget</category>
		<dc:creator>homunculus</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


