<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with California and law</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/California+law</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'California' and 'law' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 07:50:48 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 07:50:48 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>There are known unknowns</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/85851/There%2Dare%2Dknown%2Dunknowns</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/33319490/ns/us_news-crime_and_courts/"&gt;&quot;My answer is, I don&apos;t know. I don&apos;t know.&quot;&lt;/a&gt; US District Court Judge &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vaughn_R._Walker&quot;&gt;Vaughn Walker&lt;/a&gt; asked Prop 8 supporters to define the nature and extent of damage done by same-sex couples to the institution of marriage, and &lt;a href=&quot;http://lawdork.net/2009/10/14/prop-8-challenge-to-continue-to-trial/&quot;&gt;being unable to get any definitive answer&lt;/a&gt;, denied the request from supporters of Prop 8 to throw out &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Perry_v._Schwarzenegger&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;Perry v. Schwarzenegger&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt; and ordered the case to trial in January 2010.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2009:site.85851</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 07:50:48 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>bigotry</category>
		<category>california</category>
		<category>discrimination</category>
		<category>glbt</category>
		<category>law</category>
		<category>prop8</category>
		<category>rights</category>
		<dc:creator>Blazecock Pileon</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Goin&apos; to the chapel and we&apos;re / Gonna get ma-ha-harried!</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/71693/Goin%2Dto%2Dthe%2Dchapel%2Dand%2Dwere%2DGonna%2Dget%2Dmahaharried</link>
		<description> &lt;b&gt;NewsFilter:&lt;/b&gt; The California Supreme Court has just &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-me-gaymarriage16-2008may16,1,4027698.story&quot;&gt;overturned the state&apos;s ban on same-sex marriages&lt;/a&gt;. Read the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.courtinfo.ca.gov/opinions/documents/S147999.PDF&quot;&gt;decision&lt;/a&gt;.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2008:site.71693</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 10:41:00 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>california</category>
		<category>champagneforeverybody</category>
		<category>gay</category>
		<category>gaymarriage</category>
		<category>hooray</category>
		<category>law</category>
		<category>marriage</category>
		<category>mazeltov</category>
		<category>newsfilter</category>
		<category>samesexmarriage</category>
		<dc:creator>Faint of Butt</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>One more knot gets tied, sort of</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/61713/One%2Dmore%2Dknot%2Dgets%2Dtied%2Dsort%2Dof</link>
		<description> &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=10584362&quot;&gt;New Hampshire approves same-sex unions&lt;/a&gt; with &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.concordmonitor.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070427/REPOSITORY/704270341/1037/NEWS04&quot;&gt;bipartisan, if contentious support&lt;/a&gt;, recognizing both in- and out-of-state unions and marriages. While New York&apos;s Eliot Spitzer follows up on a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ny.gov/governor/press/0427071.html&quot;&gt;campaign promise&lt;/a&gt;, higher courts in &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/pub/07-08/bill/asm/ab_0001-0050/ab_43_bill_20070409_amended_asm_v98.html&quot;&gt;California&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;http://jurist.law.pitt.edu/paperchase/2006/07/connecticut-court-upholds-civil-unions.php&quot;&gt;Connecticut&lt;/a&gt; may make decisions on the constitutionality of same-sex marriage later this year, deciding if a civil union is an adequate legal substitution for marriage.&lt;/a&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2007:site.61713</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jun 2007 22:06:30 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>california</category>
		<category>civilrights</category>
		<category>civilunion</category>
		<category>connecticut</category>
		<category>glbt</category>
		<category>law</category>
		<category>marriage</category>
		<category>newhampshire</category>
		<category>newsfilter</category>
		<category>same-sex</category>
		<category>union</category>
		<category>us</category>
		<category>usa</category>
		<dc:creator>Blazecock Pileon</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Thanks for the new living room, neighbor!</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/38158/Thanks%2Dfor%2Dthe%2Dnew%2Dliving%2Droom%2Dneighbor</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/chronicle/archive/2004/12/20/MNGRAAEL4H1.DTL"&gt;Thanks for the new living room, neighbor!&lt;/a&gt; In case you needed any further news about &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/mefi/38156&quot;&gt;the earth moving&lt;/a&gt;, residents in Berkeley, CA have found themselves embroiled in a property-line quagmire as the result of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/chronicle/archive/2004/12/20/MNGRAAEL4H1.DTL&quot;&gt;the shifting earth&lt;/a&gt;.  Small quakes and unstable ground have caused real property to slide as much as 20 feet in the last century, though property lines remain firmly fixed, in some cases causing bitter disputes between neighbors who find themselves with new and sometimes unwanted &quot;improvements&quot; relocated across into their survey area.  Even in California where the earth moves &lt;a href=&quot;http://quake.wr.usgs.gov/research/strongmotion/intensity/1989.html&quot;&gt;all&lt;/a&gt;   &lt;a href=&quot;http://quake.wr.usgs.gov/research/strongmotion/intensity/1906.html&quot;&gt;the&lt;/a&gt;  &lt;a href=&quot;http://pasadena.wr.usgs.gov/office/hudnut/hudnut/nr_eq.html&quot;&gt; time&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/cacodes/ccp/751.50-751.65.html&quot;&gt;the  law&lt;/a&gt; still hasn&apos;t  quite caught up to these trickle events.&lt;/a&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2004:site.38158</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Dec 2004 10:46:57 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>berkely</category>
		<category>california</category>
		<category>earthquake</category>
		<category>law</category>
		<category>propertyline</category>
		<category>propertylines</category>
		<dc:creator>Ogre Lawless</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>California bill to ease move aways by custodial parents pulled.</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/35050/California%2Dbill%2Dto%2Dease%2Dmove%2Daways%2Dby%2Dcustodial%2Dparents%2Dpulled</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.dailynews.com/Stories/0,1413,200~20954~2341264,00.html"&gt;California bill to ease &quot;move aways&quot; by custodial parents pulled.&lt;/a&gt; Until a recent CA Supreme Court decision, it was easy for custodial parents to move themselves and their children far from their ex-spouse.  The Court reversed the old rule and held that the move could be blocked if the non-custodial parent could show that it would interfere with his/her relationship with the kids.  Legislation to reimpose the old permissive standard passed through the State Senate, but has now been pulled off the legislative calendar after an outcry by father&apos;s rights groups.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2004:site.35050</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Aug 2004 13:03:12 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>california</category>
		<category>children</category>
		<category>families</category>
		<category>law</category>
		<category>lawsuits</category>
		<category>legal</category>
		<category>parenting</category>
		<category>parents</category>
		<dc:creator>MattD</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Licenses Revoked</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/34946/Licenses%2DRevoked</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/news/archive/2004/08/12/national1259EDT0578.DTL&amp;amp;type=printable"&gt;California Supreme Court voids all San Francisco same-sex marriages&lt;/a&gt; . Said the mayor overstepped his authority and that the city violated the state law.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2004:site.34946</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Aug 2004 10:15:40 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>california</category>
		<category>gay</category>
		<category>law</category>
		<category>marriage</category>
		<category>sanfrancisco</category>
		<dc:creator>kokogiak</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>More Diebold problems.</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/29620/More%2DDiebold%2Dproblems</link>
		<description> &lt;a href=&quot;http://blog.danceslut.net/archives/000273.html&quot;&gt;Anthony Argyriou&lt;/a&gt; uncovers what seems to be a serious problem either with California voting machines or the vote tallying system: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ss.ca.gov/elections/sov/2003_special/recall_question.pdf&quot;&gt;The Secretary of State&apos;s summary of votes&lt;/a&gt; on the Davis recall shows three counties--Alameda, Kern, and Plumas--that apparently had &lt;em&gt;zero &lt;/em&gt;voters who didn&apos;t vote on the recall.  Not one.  All three counties used Diebold machines.  Other counties ranged from 0.5% to 10.3% of voters not voting on the recall.  &lt;a href=&quot;http://electionlawblog.org/archives/000253.html&quot;&gt;More &lt;/a&gt;from Rick Hasen, a top election law scholar.  &lt;small&gt;[Via &lt;a href=&quot;http://volokh.com/2003_11_09_volokh_archive.html#106891793965376920&quot;&gt;Volokh&lt;/a&gt;.]&lt;/small&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.29620</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Nov 2003 08:08:29 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>california</category>
		<category>diebold</category>
		<category>election</category>
		<category>electionfraud</category>
		<category>electronicvoting</category>
		<category>governator</category>
		<category>law</category>
		<category>voting</category>
		<dc:creator>monju_bosatsu</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/20546/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.supremecourtus.gov/"&gt;The Supreme Court&lt;/a&gt; begins its term this coming Monday.  There are lots of exciting cases on the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.supremecourtus.gov/oral_arguments/argument_calendars/monthlyargumentcaloctober2002.pdf&quot;&gt;calendar&lt;/a&gt; &lt;small&gt;(99k PDF)&lt;/small&gt;.  For example, &lt;i&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cjlf.org/briefs/Ewing.htm&quot;&gt;Ewing v. California&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/i&gt;, which will test California&apos;s 3 strikes rule.  &lt;i&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.prolifeaction.org/now_vs_scheidler_case.htm&quot;&gt;Scheidler&lt;/a&gt; v. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nowfoundation.org/reproduc/scheidler.html&quot;&gt;NOW&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/i&gt;, which has to do with anti-abortion activists blocking access to clinics.  And of course, &lt;i&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://eldred.cc&quot;&gt;Eldred&lt;/a&gt; v. Ashcroft&lt;/i&gt;, where the issue is whether or not the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.loc.gov/copyright/legislation/s505.pdf&quot;&gt;1998 Sonny Bono Copyright Term Extension Act&lt;/a&gt; &lt;small&gt;(PDF)&lt;/small&gt; is Constitutional.  The last has been mentioned in a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/comments.mefi/18000&quot;&gt;couple&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/comments.mefi/14923&quot;&gt;threads&lt;/a&gt; and has gotten &lt;a href=&quot;http://eon.law.harvard.edu/openlaw/eldredvashcroft/&quot;&gt;loads&lt;/a&gt; of &lt;a href=&quot;http://lawschool.stanford.edu/~erika/eldred.shtml&quot;&gt;web&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://archive.salon.com/tech/feature/2002/02/21/web_copyright/&quot;&gt;attention&lt;/a&gt;, including this new piece from &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/10.10/lessig.html&quot;&gt;WIRED&lt;/a&gt;.  A lot to look forward to, whether you&apos;re interested in one of the specific issues or you&apos;re just an avid armchair justice.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.20546</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Oct 2002 09:28:44 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>Abortion</category>
		<category>Ashcroft</category>
		<category>California</category>
		<category>Eldred</category>
		<category>Ewing</category>
		<category>Law</category>
		<category>Legal</category>
		<category>NOW</category>
		<category>Scheidler</category>
		<category>SupremeCourt</category>
		<category>TermExtensioNAct</category>
		<category>Wired</category>
		<dc:creator>jewishbuddha</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/15011/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-022202sam.story"&gt;In California, it&apos;s now legal for criminals to profit from the sale of stories related to their crimes.&lt;/a&gt; Yesterday the CA Supreme Court unanimously struck down the 16 year-old Son of Sam law.  The test case involved the movie rights to the story of the man who kidnapped Frank Sinatra, Jr.  Victims are angry, but others say that the law represented a direct conflict with free speech, and could have been used to suppress anti-government voices.  (more inside)  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.15011</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2002 10:54:16 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>books</category>
		<category>california</category>
		<category>crimes</category>
		<category>criminals</category>
		<category>law</category>
		<category>legal</category>
		<category>sonofsam</category>
		<dc:creator>bingo</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/11812/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.theunion.com/news/N25Pobl10195668.html"&gt;The crimes they are a&apos;changing.&lt;/a&gt; This comes from the daily police log of The Union newspaper Grass Valley/Nevada City, CA.  Surveillance cameras (and apparently not very effective ones) were stolen while mystery powders kept the cops hopping.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.11812</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Oct 2001 09:13:00 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>anthrax</category>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>California</category>
		<category>cameras</category>
		<category>crime</category>
		<category>GrassValley</category>
		<category>law</category>
		<category>stolen</category>
		<category>surveillance</category>
		<category>theft</category>
		<dc:creator>tnadeau</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/6607/</link>
		<description> San Francisco couple has been &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cnn.com/2001/LAW/03/27/dog.mauling.arrests/index.html&quot;&gt;charged with murder and manslaughter&lt;/a&gt; from the January 26 &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/comments.mefi/5929&quot;&gt;fatal mauling&lt;/a&gt; of a neighbor by two dogs they were caring for.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.6607</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2001 22:18:27 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>California</category>
		<category>crime</category>
		<category>dogs</category>
		<category>law</category>
		<category>MarjorieKnoller</category>
		<category>mauling</category>
		<category>murder</category>
		<category>RobertNoel</category>
		<category>SanFrancisco</category>
		<category>SF</category>
		<dc:creator>crushed</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


