<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with California and recall</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/California+recall</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'California' and 'recall' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2003 09:54:38 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2003 09:54:38 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>California recall prediction contest</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/28776/California%2Drecall%2Dprediction%2Dcontest</link>
		<description> California voters recall Gov. Gray Davis &lt;a href=&quot;http://128.255.244.60/quotes/68.html&quot;&gt;55-45 percent&lt;/a&gt; and elect Arnold Schwarzenegger with &lt;a href=&quot;http://128.255.244.60/quotes/69.html&quot;&gt;45 percent&lt;/a&gt; of the replacement vote. That&apos;s where the money is in the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.biz.uiowa.edu/iem/markets/&quot;&gt;Iowa Political Markets&lt;/a&gt; for tomorrow&apos;s recall election. To see how well MetaFilter&apos;s pundits fare in predicting the results, I&apos;m offering a bribe ...  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.28776</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2003 09:54:38 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>ahnuld</category>
		<category>california</category>
		<category>graydavis</category>
		<category>recall</category>
		<category>schwarzenegger</category>
		<dc:creator>rcade</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Federal Appeals Court Delays California Recall</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/28325/Federal%2DAppeals%2DCourt%2DDelays%2DCalifornia%2DRecall</link>
		<description> The Gropenator will have to spin his wheels for awhile: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nytimes.com/2003/09/16/national/16RECA.html?ei=5062&amp;en=9568148dbf7cc0d4&amp;ex=1064289600&amp;partner=GOOGLE&amp;pagewanted=print&amp;position=&quot;&gt;California&apos;s Vote Delayed by Court Over Punch Cards&lt;/a&gt;. And here&apos;s the kicker--it&apos;s deja vu all over again, Bizarro stylee: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nytimes.com/2003/09/16/national/16LEGA.html?amp;ei=5062&amp;en=1d7150c6f5a60b27&amp;partner=GOOGLE&amp;ex=1064289600&amp;pagewanted=print&amp;position=&quot;&gt;Bush v. Gore Outlives Its Limited Warranty for Use in California&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;small&gt;&lt;small&gt;The Supreme Court&apos;s decision in Bush v. Gore was meant to be a ticket good for one ride. 

&quot;Our consideration is limited to the present circumstances,&quot; the justices said in their unsigned opinion in 2000, &quot;for the problem of equal protection in election processes generally presents many complexities.&quot;

Three judges on the federal appeals court in San Francisco, all appointed by Democratic presidents, decided yesterday to use it for another ride anyway. &lt;/small&gt;&lt;/small&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.28325</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2003 20:23:03 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>california</category>
		<category>elections</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>punchcards</category>
		<category>recall</category>
		<dc:creator>y2karl</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>California Recall</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/28310/California%2DRecall</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/news/archive/2003/09/15/state1319EDT0083.DTL"&gt;9th Circuit Court blocks California Recall Election&lt;/a&gt; because six counties would be using outdated punch-card ballots. Perhaps  the court should have paid a visit to the 
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.blackboxvoting.com&quot;&gt; Black Box Voting&lt;/a&gt; web site to look at all the problems surfacing with the Electronic Voting machines.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.28310</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2003 10:42:58 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>California</category>
		<category>election</category>
		<category>electronicvoting</category>
		<category>recall</category>
		<category>voting</category>
		<dc:creator>thedailygrowl</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Just pick one...</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/27581/Just%2Dpick%2Done</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.cnn.com/2003/ALLPOLITICS/08/10/calif.recall/index.html"&gt;There will be over 150 candidates on the ballot at the California recall.&lt;/a&gt; Does anyone else think that this might lead to ballot woes? Will officials use a &apos;butterfly&apos; design to save space? What are your thoughts on this?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.27581</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Aug 2003 06:59:19 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>california</category>
		<category>recall</category>
		<category>vote</category>
		<dc:creator>clevershark</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Do you recall Davis? No, me neither.</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/27206/Do%2Dyou%2Drecall%2DDavis%2DNo%2Dme%2Dneither</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/news/archive/2003/07/23/national2301EDT0904.DTL"&gt;Davis to face recall&lt;/a&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.27206</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2003 21:31:03 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>California</category>
		<category>Davis</category>
		<category>governor</category>
		<category>GrayDavis</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>recall</category>
		<dc:creator>raaka</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Sac Bee Editorial board on Davis recall</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/26573/Sac%2DBee%2DEditorial%2Dboard%2Don%2DDavis%2Drecall</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.sacbee.com/content/opinion/story/6901986p-7851583c.html"&gt;Recalls for Dummies&lt;/a&gt; When, back on the 12th, scarabic posted a FPP on the Gray Davis recall, as a right coaster I couldn&apos;t work up any  enthusiasm to follow the eight different links.  It just wasn&apos;t my dance.

But the Sacramento Bee took the transcript of their editorial board&apos;s internal discussion of the issue, expanded and cleaned it up, then posted it on-line.  One stop shopping, with the minimum of tendentiousness allowable by law.  Now I&apos;ve got a much better understanding of what&apos;s at stake, including why it could be a blessing in disguise for the Democrats.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.26573</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2003 08:56:19 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>california</category>
		<category>coaster</category>
		<category>democrats</category>
		<category>fpp</category>
		<category>graydavis</category>
		<category>recall</category>
		<category>stake</category>
		<category>transcript</category>
		<dc:creator>mojohand</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


