<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with Cheney and gwb</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/Cheney+gwb</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'Cheney' and 'gwb' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 19 Oct 2005 21:24:38 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Oct 2005 21:24:38 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>It just keeps unravelling</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/46004/It%2Djust%2Dkeeps%2Dunravelling</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://news.ft.com/cms/s/afdb7b0c-40f3-11da-b3f9-00000e2511c8.html"&gt;It just keeps unravelling&lt;/a&gt; ...&lt;i&gt;Colonel Lawrence Wilkerson, chief of staff to Mr Powell until last January, said: &#8220;What I saw was a cabal between the vice-president of the United States, Richard Cheney, and the secretary of defense, Donald Rumsfeld, on critical issues that made decisions that the bureaucracy did not know were being made&quot;.&lt;/i&gt; I suppose now we have extra proof of the bumbling and fumbling of GWB, but now it&apos;s almost overkill.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2005:site.46004</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Oct 2005 21:24:38 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>cabal</category>
		<category>cheney</category>
		<category>dubya</category>
		<category>gwb</category>
		<category>powell</category>
		<category>rice</category>
		<category>rumsfeld</category>
		<category>wilkerson</category>
		<dc:creator>Kickstart70</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Astroturfing gone bad.</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/30440/Astroturfing%2Dgone%2Dbad</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://wampum.wabanaki.net/archives/000660.html"&gt;Astroturfing gone bad.&lt;/a&gt; Why aren&apos;t newspaper editors fighting this? &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.usatoday.com/news/world/iraq/2003-10-12-iraq-letters-usat_x.htm&quot;&gt;They&apos;ve seen it before.&lt;/a&gt; Its one thing to offer a press release and another to ask&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.georgewbush.com/GetActive/WriteNewspapers.aspx?aid=102&quot;&gt; visitors of the Bush-Cheney website to mail their newspapers&lt;/a&gt; the same form letter.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.30440</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2003 09:52:59 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>astroturfing</category>
		<category>Bush</category>
		<category>Cheney</category>
		<category>DickCheney</category>
		<category>forestry</category>
		<category>GeorgeBush</category>
		<category>GOP</category>
		<category>GWB</category>
		<category>newspapers</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>Republicans</category>
		<dc:creator>skallas</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/19861/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A59403-2002Sep9.html"&gt;U.S. Stops Iraq-Al Qaeda Talk&lt;/a&gt; From the Washington Post. Beyond the superficial significance of administration back-tracking, in regards to intelligence there seems to be two key aspects to this story: 1) The article talks about how the CIA was unable to &quot;validate two prominent allegations made by high-ranking administration officials,&quot; implying that Bush/Cheney/etc. have been making baseless assumptions about Iraq in their pro-war arguments, and 2) it brings into question whether we know anything at all about Iraq, anyway. What if the same can be said of Hussein&apos;s nuclear plans?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.19861</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Sep 2002 07:09:49 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>alqaeda</category>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>Bush</category>
		<category>Cheney</category>
		<category>CIA</category>
		<category>DickCheney</category>
		<category>GeorgeBush</category>
		<category>GWB</category>
		<category>Iraq</category>
		<category>iraqwar</category>
		<category>misinformation</category>
		<category>war</category>
		<category>WashingtonPost</category>
		<dc:creator>risenc</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/7760/</link>
		<description> I still can&apos;t get over the fact that the U.S. President and Vice President have been arrested five times between them. For those keeping score, that&apos;s &lt;a href=&quot;http://alcoholism.about.com/health/alcoholism/library/weekly/aa001104a.htm&quot;&gt;2 DUIs for Cheney and one for Bush&lt;/a&gt;, and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.dke.org/bushyaletimes.html&quot;&gt;two disorderly conducts for Bush&lt;/a&gt;.

I know, I know, many other presidents have committed far greater crimes, these were mistakes of youth, etc. etc.

But five arrests between them? Sigh.



 </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.7760</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2001 09:53:39 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>arrests</category>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>Bush</category>
		<category>Cheney</category>
		<category>DickCheney</category>
		<category>GeorgeBush</category>
		<category>GWB</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>USA</category>
		<dc:creator>luser</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/4485/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.cnn.com/2000/ALLPOLITICS/stories/11/27/presidential.election/index.html"&gt;The first step in setting up a parallel government?&lt;/a&gt; &quot;Republican vice-presidential candidate Dick Cheney said if the General Services Administration will not assist George W. Bush&apos;s transition to the White House, the campaign is prepared to go ahead on its own. &apos;We will proceed drawing on other sources,&apos; Cheney told reporters in Washington on Monday.&quot;  Yeah, I just bet they will.
 </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2000:site.4485</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Nov 2000 14:04:28 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>2000</category>
		<category>AlGore</category>
		<category>Bush</category>
		<category>Cheney</category>
		<category>DickCheney</category>
		<category>election</category>
		<category>GeorgeBush</category>
		<category>Gore</category>
		<category>GSA</category>
		<category>GWB</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>transition</category>
		<category>USA</category>
		<category>WhiteHouse</category>
		<dc:creator>tranquileye</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


