<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with Cia and iraqwar</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/Cia+iraqwar</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'Cia' and 'iraqwar' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2008 08:04:53 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2008 08:04:53 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>Ron Suskind Says White House Forged Iraq-Al Qaeda Letter</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/73856/Ron%2DSuskind%2DSays%2DWhite%2DHouse%2DForged%2DIraqAl%2DQaeda%2DLetter</link>
		<description> In his new book, &apos;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ronsuskind.com/thewayoftheworld/&quot;&gt;The Way of the World&lt;/a&gt;&apos; &quot;Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist Ron Suskind claims that, after the Iraq war began, the White House ordered the CIA to forge a back-dated, handwritten letter from the head of Iraqi intelligence to Saddam Hussein, in an attempt to tie Hussein to the 9/11 attacks.&quot;&lt;sup&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://thinkprogress.org/2008/08/05/suskind-iraq/&quot;&gt;*&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/sup&gt; Suskind &lt;a href=&quot;http://dyn.politico.com/printstory.cfm?uuid=90E15887-3048-5C12-00F2EE5A4BEEF1B8&quot;&gt;writes&lt;/a&gt;: &quot;&apos;It said that 9/11 ringleader Mohammad Atta had actually trained for his mission in Iraq&apos; and that Iraq bought yellowcake uranium from Niger with the help of al Qaeda. Suskind also claims that the Bush administration had information from a top Iraqi intelligence official &quot;that there were no weapons of mass destruction in Iraq &#8211; intelligence they received in plenty of time to stop an invasion.&quot; After the fake letter was released in late 2003, press outlets reported it as evidence of a Saddam/al Qaeda link. &quot;Now, if this is true, that blows the lid off al Qaeda&#8212;Saddam,&quot; said Bill O&#8217;Reilly at the time. &quot;The White House plans to push back hard,&quot; Politico reports. Former CIA Director George Tenet today called the charges &apos;ridiculous&apos; and questioned whether Suskind is a &apos;serious journalist.&apos; &apos;There was no such order from the White House to me,&apos; he said. On &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RAGl38unUs0&amp;eurl=http://thinkprogress.org/&quot;&gt;NBC&#8217;s Today Show&lt;/a&gt; [video|01:34], Suskind said Tenet simply does not remember the letter &#8212; but Tenet&#8217;s staff does:&lt;blockquote&gt;&apos;I think this is part of George&#8217;s memory issue....He seems not to remember it. That&#8217;s at least what he claims. In this book, instead of going to George, I went to all the people around George, close to George, who remember because they were involved in the thing, and they remember what George says to them.&apos;&lt;/blockquote&gt;After a White House meeting, Tenet went back to the CIA and ordered his staff to forge the letter. &apos;Listen Marine, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=93293353&quot;&gt;you&#8217;re not going to like this&lt;/a&gt;, but here goes,&apos; Tenet told Rob Richer, former head of the CIA&#8217;s Near East Division, according to Richer.&lt;sup&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://thinkprogress.org/2008/08/05/suskind-iraq/&quot;&gt;*&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/sup&gt; </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2008:site.73856</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2008 08:04:53 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>alQaeda</category>
		<category>BushAdministration</category>
		<category>CIA</category>
		<category>GeorgeTenet</category>
		<category>IraqWar</category>
		<category>RonSuskind</category>
		<category>SaddamHussein</category>
		<category>TheWayoftheWorld&apos;</category>
		<category>WhiteHouse</category>
		<dc:creator>ericb</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Murray Waas is the new Bob Woodward</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/50784/Murray%2DWaas%2Dis%2Dthe%2Dnew%2DBob%2DWoodward</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://journalism.nyu.edu/pubzone/weblogs/pressthink/"&gt;Murray Waas is the new Bob Woodward.&lt;/a&gt; An &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.americanthinker.com/articles.php?article_id=5402&quot;&gt;opposing view&lt;/a&gt;. Wuh-duh-yuh-bet most Americans will be &lt;b&gt;much more&lt;/b&gt; interested in &lt;a href=&quot;http://abcnews.go.com/Business/Entertainment/story?id=1825619&amp;page=1&quot;&gt;this story&lt;/a&gt;?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2006:site.50784</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Apr 2006 09:52:24 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>AmericanThinker</category>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>CIA</category>
		<category>ConspiracyTheory</category>
		<category>GeorgeWBush</category>
		<category>IraqWar</category>
		<category>MurrayWaas</category>
		<category>NYU</category>
		<category>USGovernment</category>
		<category>USPolitics</category>
		<category>ValeriePlame</category>
		<category>Yellowcake</category>
		<dc:creator>spock</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>wmd intelligence</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/46842/wmd%2Dintelligence</link>
		<description> &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.commondreams.org/headlines05/1120-01.htm&quot;&gt;Curveball&apos;s motive, CIA officials said, was not to start a war. He simply was seeking a German visa.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
You would think that there would be some &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/05/27/AR2005052701618_pf.html&quot;&gt;serious repercussions&lt;/a&gt; for &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A19831-2005Apr1.html&quot;&gt;&quot;mishandling&quot;&lt;/a&gt; intelligence used to start a war. &lt;br /&gt;
Then again it&apos;s not like this is really &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.guardian.co.uk/Iraq/Story/0,2763,1184172,00.html&quot;&gt;news &lt;small&gt;(dated 4/2004)&lt;/small&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;small&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/mefi/46515&quot;&gt;A different angle previously discussed here on Metafilter&lt;a /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/small&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/a&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2005:site.46842</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Nov 2005 15:47:00 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>CIA</category>
		<category>Curveball</category>
		<category>Germany</category>
		<category>intelligence</category>
		<category>Iraq</category>
		<category>iraqwar</category>
		<category>WMD</category>
		<category>WMDs</category>
		<dc:creator>threehundredandsixty</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Federally funded Sci-Fi</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/35097/Federally%2Dfunded%2DSciFi</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/iraq/la-na-wmd20aug20,1,101425.story?coll=la-home-headlines"&gt;Federally Funded Science Fiction.&lt;/a&gt; The CIA announced today that next month&apos;s final report on Iraq&apos;s weapons program under Saddam Hussein will mostly encompass an analysis of what they believe Iraq would be like through 2008 had Bush not invaded the country.  Because when you want accurate, detailed analysis of the future of Iraq&apos;s weapons, you turn to the group that &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/c/a/2004/07/06/MNGEH7H79B1.DTL&quot;&gt;got it completely wrong&lt;/a&gt; during the present.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2004:site.35097</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Aug 2004 13:55:34 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>CIA</category>
		<category>future</category>
		<category>Iraq</category>
		<category>IraqWar</category>
		<category>speculation</category>
		<category>WMD</category>
		<dc:creator>XQUZYPHYR</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>It turns out it wasn&apos;t Joe Klein</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/34096/It%2Dturns%2Dout%2Dit%2Dwasnt%2DJoe%2DKlein</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.bostonphoenix.com/boston/news_features/other_stories/multipage/documents/03949394.asp"&gt;The anonymous author of Imperial Hubris&lt;/a&gt; has been revealed.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2004:site.34096</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jul 2004 09:40:21 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>911</category>
		<category>afghanistan</category>
		<category>alqaeda</category>
		<category>anonymous</category>
		<category>binladen</category>
		<category>book</category>
		<category>cia</category>
		<category>gwot</category>
		<category>iraqwar</category>
		<category>mike</category>
		<category>osamabinladen</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>usa</category>
		<category>uspolitics</category>
		<dc:creator>sixpack</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Iraq Lacked Atom Whack</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/29205/Iraq%2DLacked%2DAtom%2DWhack</link>
		<description> &lt;em&gt;At least four times in the fall of 2002, the president and his advisers invoked the specter of a &quot;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cnn.com/2002/ALLPOLITICS/10/07/bush.transcript/&quot; title=&quot;Bush: Don&apos;t wait for mushroom cloud&quot;&gt;mushroom cloud&lt;/a&gt;,&quot; and some of them, including Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld, described &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn/A17707-2003Oct25?language=printer&quot; title=&quot;According to records made available to The Washington Post and interviews with arms investigators from the United States, Britain and Australia, it did not require a comprehensive survey to find the central assertions of the Bush administration&apos;s prewar nuclear case to be insubstantial or untrue. Although Hussein did not relinquish his nuclear ambitions or technical records, investigators said, it is now clear he had no active program to build a weapon, produce its key materials or obtain the technology he needed for either.&quot;&gt;Iraq&apos;s nuclear ambitions as a threat to the American homeland&lt;/a&gt;... Among the closely held internal judgments of the Iraq Survey Group, overseen by David Kay as special representative of CIA Director George J. Tenet, are that Iraq&apos;s nuclear weapons scientists did no significant arms-related work after 1991, that facilities with suspicious new construction proved benign, and that equipment of potential use to a nuclear program remained under seal or in civilian industrial use. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/em&gt;So in regards to Iraq&apos;s possession of &lt;em&gt;the one weapon we can be certain causes mass destruction: the atomic bomb&lt;/em&gt;, as &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.why-war.com/news/2002/10/07/weaponso.html&quot; title=&quot;Aum Shinrikyo employed skilled scientists and spent freely to make&apos;&apos;high grade&apos;&apos; anthrax, which it spread around Tokyo on several occasions. The cult gave up on anthrax after it failed to infect even a single person.&quot;&gt;Gregg&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.newagepointofinfinity.com/homeland_security.htm&quot; title=&quot;The British and Germans used one ton of chemical weapons per fatality caused during World War I. The 1995 release of the nerve gas sarin in the Tokyo subways by the Aum Shinrikyo sect killed 12 people, fewer than a small, standard bomb might have killed in that crowded, enclosed area. An estimated 5,000 Kurds died in Saddam Hussein&apos;s chemical attack on Halabja, Iraq, in 1988, but this involved dozens of fighter-bombers making repeated low passes over the town. It&apos;s hard to imagine that terrorists could pull off such a coordinated heavy military maneuver. The image of millions cowering behind plastic sheets as clouds of biological weapons envelop a city owes more to science fiction than reality. The Japanese use of fleas infected with bubonic plague against Chinese cities in World War II was the only successful instance of bioattacks in contemporary warfare. In 1971, &apos;&apos;weaponized&apos;&apos; smallpox was accidentally released from a Soviet plant; three people died. In 1979, an explosion at another Soviet site released a large quantity of weapons-grade anthrax; 68 people died.In 1989, workers at an American government laboratory near Washington were accidentally exposed to Ebola, and it was several days before the mistake was discovered; no one died. A coordinated anthrax attack in the fall of 2001 killed five people, a tiny fraction of the number who died of influenza during the time the nation was terrified by the anthrax letters.&quot;&gt;Easterbrook&lt;/a&gt; put it, the verdict is the unsurprising (and unsurprisingly &lt;em&gt;closely held&lt;/em&gt;) nope, not, zero, zip, nada...&lt;/a&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.29205</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2003 15:43:26 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>CIA</category>
		<category>DavidKay</category>
		<category>DonaldRumsfeld</category>
		<category>Easterbrook</category>
		<category>GeorgeTenet</category>
		<category>intelligence</category>
		<category>iraq</category>
		<category>IraqSurveyGroup</category>
		<category>iraqwar</category>
		<category>middleast</category>
		<category>mideast</category>
		<category>mushrooms</category>
		<category>nuclearweapons</category>
		<category>Rumsfeld</category>
		<category>Tenet</category>
		<category>USMilitary</category>
		<category>war</category>
		<dc:creator>y2karl</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>It&apos;s not censorship if it doesn&apos;t work</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/27182/Its%2Dnot%2Dcensorship%2Dif%2Dit%2Ddoesnt%2Dwork</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.democracynow.org/article.pl?sid=03/07/23/168232"&gt;GOP Warns TV Stations Not to Air Ad Alleging Bush Mislead the Nation Over Iraq&lt;/a&gt; They claim that the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.democrats.org/truth/index.html?s=front&quot;&gt;ad itself &lt;/a&gt;is dishonest, and cite the obligation of broadcast outlets to be free of misleading information.  &#8220;&lt;em&gt;Such obligations must be taken seriously. This letter puts you on notice that the information contained in the above-cited advertisement is false and misleading; therefore, you are obligated to refrain from airing this advertisement.&#8221; &lt;/em&gt;  Despite the implicit threats, &lt;em&gt;only one station has refused to run the ad, a Fox station. &lt;/em&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.27182</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2003 09:57:02 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>Bush</category>
		<category>censorship</category>
		<category>CIA</category>
		<category>GeorgeWBush</category>
		<category>GOP</category>
		<category>GWB</category>
		<category>intelligence</category>
		<category>iraq</category>
		<category>iraqwar</category>
		<category>journalism</category>
		<category>media</category>
		<category>spin</category>
		<category>tv</category>
		<dc:creator>Ignatius J. Reilly</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>An unbearable stench?</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/26991/An%2Dunbearable%2Dstench</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2003/07/15/opinion/15KRIS.html?pagewanted=print&amp;amp;position="&gt;Cooked intel revolts spooks - Spooks revolt&lt;/a&gt; : elements of the US intelligence community are between &lt;a href=&quot;http://cnn.usnews.printthis.clickability.com/pt/cpt?action=cpt&amp;expire=-1&amp;urlID=6483447&amp;fb=Y&amp;partnerID=2004&quot;&gt;outrage and open revolt&lt;/a&gt;, and Veterans for Intelligence Sanity, a group of ex - CIA professionals led by Ray McGovern, a 27 year veteran of the CIA who used to brief George Bush Sr., has called for Dick Cheney&apos;s resignation in an open letter to GW Bush, reports Nick Kristoff. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.stopdubya.com/CIA%20Vets%20say%20intelligence%20was%20cooked.htm&quot;&gt;&lt;i&gt;&quot;You may not realize the extent of the current ferment within the intelligence community and particularly the CIA&quot;&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/a&gt; they have warned Mr. Bush. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.redpepper.org.uk/July2003/x-July2003-dreyfuss.html&quot;&gt;At the heart of the matter&lt;/a&gt; is the  Pentagon&#8217;s Office of Special Plans (OSP) under the leadership of Abram Shulsky.

Meanwhile, &quot;It&apos;s like, duh, the net doesn&apos;t forget. Get it?&quot; : &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.tompaine.com/feature2.cfm/id/7943/view/print&quot;&gt;a blogger compiles a chronological list of Bush Administration statements on Iraq&apos;s WMD&apos;s&lt;/a&gt; - from &lt;i&gt;&quot;Intelligence gathered by this and other governments leaves no doubt that the Iraq regime continues to possess and conceal some of the most lethal weapons ever devised.&quot;&lt;/i&gt; (George W. Bush
Address to the Nation, March 17, 2003) to &lt;i&gt;&quot;They may have had time to destroy them, and I don&apos;t know the answer.&quot;&lt;/i&gt; (Donald Rumsfeld, Remarks to Council on Foreign Relations, May 27, 2003) and &lt;i&gt;&quot;U.S. officials never expected that &quot;we were going to open garages and find&quot; weapons of mass destruction.&lt;/i&gt; (Condoleeza Rice, Reuters Interview, May 12, 2003) Also in above link: scroll to bottom for memorandum to GW Bush.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.26991</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2003 05:20:23 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>CIA</category>
		<category>Intelligence</category>
		<category>intelligenceagencies</category>
		<category>IraqWar</category>
		<category>USIntelligence</category>
		<dc:creator>troutfishing</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/19861/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A59403-2002Sep9.html"&gt;U.S. Stops Iraq-Al Qaeda Talk&lt;/a&gt; From the Washington Post. Beyond the superficial significance of administration back-tracking, in regards to intelligence there seems to be two key aspects to this story: 1) The article talks about how the CIA was unable to &quot;validate two prominent allegations made by high-ranking administration officials,&quot; implying that Bush/Cheney/etc. have been making baseless assumptions about Iraq in their pro-war arguments, and 2) it brings into question whether we know anything at all about Iraq, anyway. What if the same can be said of Hussein&apos;s nuclear plans?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.19861</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Sep 2002 07:09:49 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>alqaeda</category>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>Bush</category>
		<category>Cheney</category>
		<category>CIA</category>
		<category>DickCheney</category>
		<category>GeorgeBush</category>
		<category>GWB</category>
		<category>Iraq</category>
		<category>iraqwar</category>
		<category>misinformation</category>
		<category>war</category>
		<category>WashingtonPost</category>
		<dc:creator>risenc</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


