<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with CivilRights and justice</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/CivilRights+justice</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'CivilRights' and 'justice' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 23 Jul 2006 12:53:17 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Sun, 23 Jul 2006 12:53:17 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>Still, neither Nixon nor Reagan changed the division&apos;s procedures for hiring career staff</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/53216/Still%2Dneither%2DNixon%2Dnor%2DReagan%2Dchanged%2Dthe%2Ddivisions%2Dprocedures%2Dfor%2Dhiring%2Dcareer%2Dstaff</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.boston.com/news/nation/washington/articles/2006/07/23/civil_rights_hiring_shifted_in_bush_era/"&gt;&quot;If anything, a civil rights background is considered a liability.&quot;&lt;/a&gt; Meet the politically-appointed career staffers of the Justice Dept.&apos;s Civil Rights Division: &lt;i&gt;... the kinds of cases the Civil Rights Division is bringing have undergone a shift. The division is bringing fewer voting rights and employment cases involving systematic discrimination against African-Americans, and more alleging reverse discrimination against whites and religious discrimination against Christians. ...&lt;/i&gt; Thorough Boston Globe article on how the administration disbanded the hiring committee in 2002 to appoint lawyers with a very different vision of what civil rights are, and the ensuring and ongoing results.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2006:site.53216</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Jul 2006 12:53:17 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>appointments</category>
		<category>bias</category>
		<category>civilrights</category>
		<category>government</category>
		<category>history</category>
		<category>justice</category>
		<category>law</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>prejudice</category>
		<category>rights</category>
		<dc:creator>amberglow</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Alarming Article on Security Procedures</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/43322/Alarming%2DArticle%2Don%2DSecurity%2DProcedures</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://alternet.org/story/23362/"&gt;Alarming Article on Security Procedures&lt;/a&gt; What is alarming is not necessarily that there is a &quot;no-fly&quot; list, or that we have security measures in response to a percieved terrorist threat.  What&apos;s alarming is that there seems to be no accountabity or due process demanded from public officials.  Without accountability, what&apos;s to stop public officials from acting arbitrarily, or for some political endeavor?  (See the Plame case.)

Combined with the Right&apos;s seeming position that the president is above the law in prosecuting a war, U.S. Supreme Court Case No. 03-1027 (Rumsfield v. Padilla) and Case No. 03-6696 (Hamdi v. Rumsfield), (see also the recent DOJ position papers), and for the 1st time I am becoming nervous that America might devolve into something like a police state.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2005:site.43322</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jul 2005 10:53:55 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>civilrights</category>
		<category>DHS</category>
		<category>dueprocess</category>
		<category>government</category>
		<category>HomelandSecurity</category>
		<category>justice</category>
		<category>noflylist</category>
		<category>oversight</category>
		<category>security</category>
		<category>terrorism</category>
		<category>USA</category>
		<category>watchlist</category>
		<dc:creator>JKevinKing</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/19600/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://web.amnesty.org/ai.nsf/index/AMR511262002"&gt;From The Slow Wheels of Justice [Department] &lt;/a&gt; we read that &quot;there have been persistent complaints of excessive force by officers of Prince George&apos;s County Police Department, Maryland over many years. Cases of concern include police shootings; deaths in custody from dangerous restraint holds or other force and unresisting suspects mauled by police dogs....In November 2000 the US Department of Justice opened a civil rights investigation into the police department to determine whether it engaged in a &quot;pattern and practice&quot; of brutality and racial discrimination....However, after 20 months of investigation, the Justice Department has not yet issued any public findings or recommendations to the police department.&quot;       </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.19600</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Aug 2002 15:24:01 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>civilrights</category>
		<category>corruption</category>
		<category>justice</category>
		<category>maryland</category>
		<category>police</category>
		<dc:creator>fold_and_mutilate</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/16510/</link>
		<description> ACLU files a lawsuit on behalf of black gay prisoner Roderick Johnson against several Texas prisons who ignored his pleas for protection against gangs who &quot;&lt;a href=&quot;http://abcnews.go.com/sections/us/DailyNews/prisonrape_suit020418.html&quot;&gt;bought and sold Mr. Johnson as a chattel, raped and degraded him on a virtual daily basis&lt;/a&gt;, and threatened him with death if he resisted.&quot; During one hearing, Johnson was allegedly forced by a prison gang member to appear before the committee in makeup. This invited the alleged derision of the classification committee members: &quot;If you want to be a ho, you&apos;ll be treated like a ho.&quot; Another member allegedly said, &quot;You ain&apos;t nothing but a dirty tramp. Learn to fight or accept the f--king.&quot;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.16510</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Apr 2002 11:12:03 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>aclu</category>
		<category>civilrights</category>
		<category>gay</category>
		<category>justice</category>
		<category>prison</category>
		<category>prisonrape</category>
		<category>texas</category>
		<dc:creator>ao4047</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/2076/</link>
		<description> &quot;For those who are feeling &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.globe.com/dailyglobe2/163/nation/2000_election_likely_to_tip_court_balance+.shtml&quot;&gt;this election doesn&apos;t much matter&lt;/a&gt;, who think it&apos;s a choice between Tweedledum and Tweedledee, the court is the reason to care,&quot; said Lois Williams, senior counsel for litigation at the Washington Lawyers Committee for Civil Rights, a liberal advocacy group.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&quot;If we get another Scalia or Thomas, we are courting disaster,&quot; said Ralph Neas, president of People for the American Way. &quot;We are just one election away, and one or two new justices away, from the civil and constitutional rights we take for granted being eroded or eliminated overnight.&quot;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2000:site.2076</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Jun 2000 17:11:10 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>americanway</category>
		<category>civilrights</category>
		<category>elections</category>
		<category>justice</category>
		<category>scalia</category>
		<category>supremecourt</category>
		<category>thomas</category>
		<dc:creator>veruca</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


