Political discourse in these desperate days is - as we all know - very much a no-holds-barred affair. We have come to expect that political debate will be nasty, personal, based on appeals to emotion, and largely divorced from consideration of real-world consequences of the positions claimed.
Still, I hope we can agree that some rhetorical flourishes are simply unacceptable in civil society. Like this piece of vileness from Adam Yoshida, imagining that "
the future of the Democratic Party [is] providing Republicans with a number of cute (but not that bright) comfort women." You read that right: "
comfort women." Left, right, or center, I hope we can all agree that we are within measurable distince of moral surrender if this sort of rhetoric goes unchallenged. Or is this really what we've come to?
(Via
Atrios, upon whose summary I cannot improve.)
posted by adamgreenfield
on Nov 10, 2004 -
62 comments