<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with Conservative and nationalreview</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/Conservative+nationalreview</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'Conservative' and 'nationalreview' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 19:58:00 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 19:58:00 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>A Conservative Son Gone Bad?</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/75659/A%2DConservative%2DSon%2DGone%2DBad</link>
		<description> Christopher Buckley &lt;a href=&quot;http://thedailybeast.com/blogs-and-stories/2008-10-10/the-conservative-case-for-obama/&quot;&gt;endorses Obama&lt;/a&gt; and then &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/10/14/AR2008101402492.html?hpid=topnews&quot;&gt;is forced to resign&lt;/a&gt; from the &lt;a href=&quot;http://nationalreview.com/&quot;&gt;National Review.&lt;/a&gt; Is he serious, or does he just want to let the Democrats &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/features/2006/0610.buckley.html&quot;&gt;f**k things up for a change?&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christopher_Buckley&quot;&gt;Christopher Buckley&apos;s&lt;/a&gt; father, &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_F._Buckley_Jr.&quot;&gt;William F. Buckley Jr.&lt;/a&gt; founded the conservative National Review magazine in 1955. Perhaps Christopher Buckley&apos;s next satirical novel shall be &lt;i&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thank_You_for_Smoking_(novel)&quot;&gt;Thank You For Voting&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/i&gt;? </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2008:site.75659</guid>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 19:58:00 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>christopherbuckley</category>
		<category>conservative</category>
		<category>democrats</category>
		<category>election</category>
		<category>nationalreview</category>
		<category>obama</category>
		<dc:creator>sararah</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Does this mean I can only listen to hip-hop now?</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/51845/Does%2Dthis%2Dmean%2DI%2Dcan%2Donly%2Dlisten%2Dto%2Dhiphop%2Dnow</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2006/05/25/arts/music/25rock.html?_r=1&amp;amp;oref=slogin"&gt;Republican-Approved Rock Music&lt;/a&gt; (NYT link).  &lt;strong&gt;The National Review&lt;/strong&gt;, the standard-bearing conservative rag founded by William F. Buckley (you know, Gore Vidal&apos;s &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_F._Buckley%2C_Jr.#Criticism&quot;&gt;good pal&lt;/a&gt;), has published a list of &quot;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nytimes.com/2006/05/25/arts/music/25brockweb.html&quot;&gt;Top 50 Conservative Rock Songs Of All Time&lt;/a&gt;&quot; (NYT again -- not TNR).  The explanations for the picks tend toward the obvious, if also occasionally nauseating.  The top pick, and many of the others, are just this week&apos;s evidence of how &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/mefi/51818&quot;&gt;irony is lost &lt;/a&gt;on much of conservative America.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2006:site.51845</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 May 2006 16:03:13 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>conservative</category>
		<category>music</category>
		<category>nationalreview</category>
		<category>republican</category>
		<category>rock</category>
		<category>rockmusic</category>
		<dc:creator>scatman</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Conservative Bestsellers And Liberal Bestsellers</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/32475/Conservative%2DBestsellers%2DAnd%2DLiberal%2DBestsellers</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.nationalreview.com/"&gt;Forget Fiction And Non-Fiction, Bud: Is The Book Liberal Or Conservative?&lt;/a&gt; The &lt;b&gt;National Review&apos;s&lt;/b&gt; bestseller list (&lt;small&gt;scroll down and click&lt;/small&gt;) is starkly divided into &quot;Conservative Bestsellers&quot; and &quot;Liberal Bestsellers&quot;.  Is this a quirky innovation and deliberate provocation or just plain stupid and sad?  Does such a dichotomy in fact exist?  How would the literature of the world fit into such a classification? (&lt;small&gt;This isn&apos;t the end of the world as we know it, is it?&lt;/small&gt;)  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2004:site.32475</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Apr 2004 17:22:45 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>bestsellers</category>
		<category>books</category>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>conservative</category>
		<category>liberal</category>
		<category>nationalreview</category>
		<dc:creator>MiguelCardoso</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/14033/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.nationalreview.com/comment/comment-spalding012102.shtml"&gt;Happy MLK Day.&lt;/a&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.14033</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2002 08:57:15 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>conservative</category>
		<category>conservativism</category>
		<category>martinlutherking</category>
		<category>martinlutherkingjr</category>
		<category>mlk</category>
		<category>nationalreview</category>
		<category>oped</category>
		<dc:creator>Ty Webb</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


