<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with Constitution</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/Constitution/rss</link>
	<description>tag posts with Constitution</description>
		  <pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2008 15:52:52 -0800</pubDate>
      <lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2008 15:52:52 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>Ecuador has a new constitution</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/75251/Ecuador-has-a-new-constitution</link>
		<description>
		Voters in Ecuador appear to have &lt;a href=&quot;http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5gOIRAjeW-EXNpFLf306HkW23vKoQD93GKPG00&quot;&gt;approved a new constitution&lt;/a&gt; yesterday, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.csmonitor.com/2008/0930/p01s08-woam.html&quot;&gt;guaranteeing&lt;/a&gt; rights to clean water, universal healthcare, pensions, and free state-run education through the university level.  It also may allow President Rafael Correa to remain in power until 2017.  Particularly of note is a world first &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ecoearth.info/shared/reader/welcome.aspx?linkid=107108&quot;&gt;bill of rights for nature&lt;/a&gt; which &lt;a href=&quot;http://dotearth.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/09/29/ecuador-constitution-grants-nature-rights/&quot;&gt;grants inalienable rights to nature&lt;/a&gt;. This portion of the constitution was drafted with the assistance of the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.celdf.org/Default.aspx?tabid=548&quot;&gt;Community Environmental Legal Defense Fund&lt;/a&gt;, a group which &quot;[provides] free and affordable legal services to community based groups and local governments working to protect their quality of life and the natural environment through building sustainable communities.&quot;

The specific provisions state: &lt;small&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.greenchange.org/article.php?id=3104&quot;&gt;(source)&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/small&gt;

    &quot;Chapter: Rights for Nature

    Art. 1. Nature or Pachamama, where life is reproduced and exists, has the right to exist, persist, maintain and regenerate its vital cycles, structure, functions and its processes in evolution.

    Every person, people, community or nationality, will be able to demand the recognitions of rights for nature before the public organisms. The application and interpretation of these rights will follow the related principles established in the Constitution.

    Art. 2. Nature has the right to an integral restoration. This integral restoration is independent of the obligation on natural and juridical persons or the State to indemnify the people and the collectives that depend on the natural systems.

    In the cases of severe or permanent environmental impact, including the ones caused by the exploitation on non renewable natural resources, the State will establish the most efficient mechanisms for the restoration, and will adopt the adequate measures to eliminate or mitigate the harmful environmental consequences.

    Art. 3. The State will motivate natural and juridical persons as well as collectives to protect nature; it will promote respect towards all the elements that form an ecosystem.

    Art. 4. The State will apply precaution and restriction measures in all the activities that can lead to the extinction of species, the destruction of the ecosystems or the permanent alteration of the natural cycles.

    The introduction of organisms and organic and inorganic material that can alter in a definitive way the national genetic patrimony is prohibited.

    Art. 5. The persons, people, communities and nationalities will have the right to benefit from the environment and form natural wealth that will allow wellbeing.

    The environmental services are cannot be appropriated; its production, provision, use and exploitation, will be regulated by the State.&quot; </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2008:site.75251</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2008 15:52:52 -0800</pubDate>

<category>Ecuador</category>

<category>constitution</category>

<category>socialism</category>

<category>environment</category>

<category>sustainability</category>

<category>southamerica</category>

<dc:creator>PercussivePaul</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>The Supreme Court and Americas international relations</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/75245/The-Supreme-Court-and-Americas-international-relations</link>
		<description>
		&lt;a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/09/28/magazine/28law-t.html?_r=1&amp;ref=magazine&amp;oref=slogin"&gt;When Judges Make Foreign Policy.&lt;/a&gt; &quot;In a globalized, post-9/11 age, decisions made by the Supreme Court are increasingly shaping America&apos;s international relations. When the next justice is appointed, our place in the world may well hang in the balance.&quot;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2008:site.75245</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2008 11:00:24 -0800</pubDate>

<category>Constitution</category>

<category>Democracy</category>

<category>Election</category>

<category>ForeignPolicy</category>

<category>InternationalRelations</category>

<category>Law</category>

<category>SupremeCourt</category>

<dc:creator>homunculus</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Who&apos;s Afraid of the Twelfth Amendment?</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/74862/Whos-Afraid-of-the-Twelfth-Amendment</link>
		<description>
		&lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Twelfth_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution&quot;&gt;The Twelfth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution&lt;/a&gt; has serviced the two-party system since 1804, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.centerforpolitics.org/reform/report_electoral.htm&quot;&gt;but not without controversy.&lt;/a&gt; Little known about Amendment XII is that it requires an absolute majority of over half of the electoral college to win, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.archives.gov/federal-register/electoral-college/calculator.html&quot;&gt;currently 270 out of 538&lt;/a&gt;. If not, as in the case of third party state victories, or a tie of 269 each, the House of Representatives then selects the president from the top three contenders, with each state delegation having only one vote (also requiring a majority). &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.electoral-vote.com/evp2008/Misc/Maps/house_delegations.html&quot;&gt;Here&apos;s what the selection might look like today, advantage Democrats&lt;/a&gt;. However, it is the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.electoral-vote.com/evp2008/House/house_races.html&quot;&gt;newly elected House&lt;/a&gt; that gets to decide the issue by the following March 4th (with the current VP ascending by default of indecision).  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2008:site.74862</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Sep 2008 11:31:45 -0800</pubDate>

<category>electoral</category>

<category>college</category>

<category>Twelfth</category>

<category>Amendment</category>

<category>election</category>

<category>constitution</category>

<category>270</category>

<category>538</category>

<dc:creator>Brian B.</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Curfew is declared in a 10 block area of a small Arkansas town</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/74091/Curfew-is-declared-in-a-10-block-area-of-a-small-Arkansas-town</link>
		<description>
		Curfew  is declared in a 10 block area of a &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Helena,_Arkansas&quot;&gt;small Arkansas town&lt;/a&gt;. From the local newspaper:  &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.helena-arkansas.com/news/x960030171/&quot;&gt;Community declares war on crime-Mayor issues curfew order&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.helena-arkansas.com/news/x1570384758/&quot;&gt;Ark. city neighborhood under 24-hour curfew&lt;/a&gt;.  The mayor has been the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.wreg.com/global/story.asp?s=8485252&quot;&gt;subject&lt;/a&gt; of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.helena-arkansas.com/news/x469162793/&quot;&gt;controversy&lt;/a&gt; in the past. </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2008:site.74091</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2008 10:04:56 -0800</pubDate>

<category>curfew</category>

<category>ACLU</category>

<category>Arkansas</category>

<category>Helena</category>

<category>WestHelena</category>

<category>unconstitutional</category>

<category>constitution</category>

<category>4thamendment</category>

<category>fourthamendment</category>

<dc:creator>Daddy-O</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Life and death of a black and white</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/73888/Life-and-death-of-a-black-and-white</link>
		<description>
		&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nytimes.com/2008/08/06/us/06execute.html?partner=rssyahoo&amp;emc=rss&quot;&gt;Texas executes Mexican national who was denied consul visit.&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ccadp.org/josemedellin.htm&quot;&gt;Jose Medellin&lt;/a&gt;, a Mexican national, was born in the border town of &lt;a href=&quot;http://maps.google.com/maps?f=q&amp;hl=en&amp;geocode=&amp;q=&amp;ie=UTF8&amp;ll=27.490609,-99.440002&amp;spn=0.543936,1.031342&amp;z=11 &quot;&gt;Nuevo Laredo, just across the Rio Grande river from Laredo,TX.&lt;/a&gt;

Medell&amp;#0237;n moved to the US when he was 3 years of age, and was 18 years of age in June of 1993 when he participated in the gang rape and murder of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.murdervictims.com/voices/jeneliz.html&quot;&gt;Jennifer Ertman, 14 and Elizabeth Pena, 16 in Houston,Texas.&lt;/a&gt; He was subsequently found guilty and sentenced to death. 

&lt;a href=&quot;http://lonestartimes.com/2008/04/04/jose-medellin-and-president-bush/&quot;&gt;In 2004&lt;/a&gt;, the International Court of Justice ruled that the Bush Administration must reconsider the case because Medellin was not informed of his right to contact Mexican consulate officials under the Vienna Convention.

After the ruling, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.oyez.org/cases/2000-2009/2007/2007_06_984/&quot;&gt;President Bush&lt;/a&gt; asserted authority under the Constitution and the various laws of the United States to order states to review the convictions and sentences of foreign nationals who had not been advised of their Vienna Convention rights.

On March 25, 2008, the &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Medell%C3%ADn_v._Texas&quot;&gt;U.S. Supreme Court&lt;/a&gt; rejected the arguments of the Bush Administration, and ruled that President Bush can&apos;t force Texas to reconsider, even if in violation of the International Court of Justice.[&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/70399/SCOTUS-tells-the-ICJ-to-go-hang&quot;&gt;Previously&lt;/a&gt;] </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2008:site.73888</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2008 10:47:48 -0800</pubDate>

<category>execution</category>

<category>death</category>

<category>row</category>

<category>constitution</category>

<category>theHague</category>

<category>murder</category>

<category>rape</category>

<category>border</category>

<category>immigration</category>

<category>illegal</category>

<category>texas</category>

<category>justice</category>

<category>international</category>

<category>law</category>

<category>mexico</category>

<category>scotus</category>

<category>supreme</category>

<category>court</category>

<category>bush</category>

<category>irony</category>

<category>united</category>

<category>states</category>

<category>gang</category>

<category>violence</category>

<category>innocent</category>

<category>victims</category>

<dc:creator>mrducts</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Bible gets sued</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/73202/Bible-gets-sued</link>
		<description>
		As the gay marriage fight unfolds in California, some gays (and others) are fighting back: one gourp is &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.boycottmanchesterhotels.com/&quot;&gt;boycotting a rich hotel owner&lt;/a&gt;, others are &lt;a href=&quot;http://istandapart.org&quot;&gt;standing apart&lt;/a&gt; and one is &lt;a href=&quot;http://365gay.com/Newscon08/07/071008bib.htm&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;suing the Bible&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (who gets subpoenaed for that one?). Meanwhile, a key &lt;a href=&quot;http://protectmarriage.com&quot;&gt;opponent to gay marriage&lt;/a&gt; keeps its doors open (and its ballot committee going) despite &lt;a href=&quot;http://thesandiegoist.com/2/tax-board-suspends-california/&quot;&gt;being suspended&lt;/a&gt;. They say they&apos;re &lt;a href=&quot;http://thesandiegoist.com/9/california-renewal-were-workin/&quot;&gt;working on it&lt;/a&gt;, but &lt;a href=&quot;http://kepler.sos.ca.gov/corpdata/ShowAllList?QueryCorpNumber=C2508784&quot;&gt;no changes yet&lt;/a&gt;.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2008:site.73202</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2008 11:44:17 -0800</pubDate>

<category>gay</category>

<category>marriage</category>

<category>california</category>

<category>lawsuits</category>

<category>christianity</category>

<category>constitution</category>

<category>boycott</category>

<category>religion</category>

<category>bible</category>

<dc:creator>nospecialfx</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>A New World Is At Hand</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/73038/A-New-World-Is-At-Hand</link>
		<description>
		These are the documents that started it all. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.archives.gov/exhibits/charters/&quot;&gt;The Charters of Freedom.&lt;/a&gt; As the USA celebrates another Independence Day, the National Archives presents the historical development of the Declaration, the Constitution, and the Bill of Rights, and their impact upon the nation and the world.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2008:site.73038</guid>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 05:38:16 -0800</pubDate>

<category>history</category>

<category>education</category>

<category>declaration</category>

<category>independence</category>

<category>constitution</category>

<category>billofrights</category>

<category>rights</category>

<category>freedom</category>

<category>4thofjuly</category>

<dc:creator>netbros</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Free the Amazon One-Click! Long Live Open Source Genes!</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/71457/Free-the-Amazon-OneClick-Long-Live-Open-Source-Genes</link>
		<description>
		&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nytimes.com/2008/05/06/washington/06bar.html?ex=1367812800&amp;en=c9a670108e8de8e8&amp;ei=5124&amp;partner=permalink&amp;exprod=permalink&quot;&gt;&#8220;I actually ran it by a number of colleagues who teach administrative law and constitutional law,&#8221; Professor Duffy said, recalling his own surprise at finding such a fundamental and important flaw. He thought he must have been missing something.&lt;/a&gt; 

Law prof notices that every US patent approved since 2000 was approved unconstitutionally and thus are all probably invalid. Looks like he may be right. Professor Duffy&apos;s &lt;a href=&quot;http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1128311&quot;&gt;journal article&lt;/a&gt; on his discovery. </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2008:site.71457</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 10:36:46 -0800</pubDate>

<category>IP</category>

<category>Patent</category>

<category>Constitution</category>

<category>law</category>

<category>powers</category>

<category>Professor</category>

<category>appointment</category>

<dc:creator>Toekneesan</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>The Chain of Command in Coercive Interrogations</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/70483/The-Chain-of-Command-in-Coercive-Interrogations</link>
		<description>
		&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.vanityfair.com/politics/features/2008/05/guantanamo200805?printable=true&amp;currentPage=all&quot;&gt;&#8220;You could almost see their dicks getting hard as they got new ideas.&quot;&lt;/a&gt; A &lt;i&gt;Vanity Fair&lt;/i&gt; reporter investigates the chain of command that tossed out the Geneva Conventions and instituted coercive interrogation techniques -- some might call them torture or even &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.salon.com/opinion/greenwald/2008/04/02/yoo/&quot;&gt;war crimes&lt;/a&gt; -- in Bush&apos;s Global War on Terror. UC Berkeley law professor John Yoo&apos;s now-obsolete 81-page memo to the Pentagon in 2003 [available as PDFs &lt;a href=&quot;http://media.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/nation/pdfs/OLCMemo1-19.pdf?sid=ST2008040102264&quot;&gt;here&lt;a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;http://media.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/nation/pdfs/OLCMemo20-39.pdf&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;] was crucial, offering a broad range of legal justifications and deniability for disregarding international law in the name of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/04/01/AR2008040102213.html&quot;&gt;&quot;self-defense.&quot;&lt;/a&gt; Others &lt;a href=&quot;http://hotair.com/archives/2008/04/02/yoo-memo-results-in-bad-reporting/&quot;&gt;say&lt;/a&gt; that Yoo was just making &quot;a clear point about the limits of Congress to intrude on the executive branch in its exercise of duties as Commander in Chief.&quot; [previously &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/68904/Mukaseys-Nuremburg-defence&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/38012/An-Executive-Order-Along-Tortures-Path&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;.]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/a&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2008:site.70483</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 07:53:05 -0800</pubDate>

<category>terror</category>

<category>9-11</category>

<category>guantanamo</category>

<category>bush</category>

<category>rumsfeld</category>

<category>yoo</category>

<category>feith</category>

<category>al-qaeda</category>

<category>interrogations</category>

<category>Geneva</category>

<category>Constitution</category>

<category>coercive</category>

<category>AbuGhraib</category>

<category>GOP</category>

<category>Haynes</category>

<category>Iraq</category>

<category>addington</category>

<category>Berkeley</category>

<category>torture</category>

<category>Republicans</category>

<category>internationallaw</category>

<category>unitaryexecutive</category>

<category>Cheney</category>

<category>911</category>

<dc:creator>digaman</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Remember the Alamo, but don&apos;t forget Poleland</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/70476/Remember-the-Alamo-but-dont-forget-Poleland</link>
		<description>
		&lt;a href="http://www.star-telegram.com/news/story/551676.html"&gt;Texan judge rules $5 "pole tax" violates First Amendment rights.&lt;/a&gt; Further, Judge Scott Jenkins found no evidence to justify the purpose of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.legis.state.tx.us/tlodocs/80R/billtext/pdf/HB01751F.pdf&quot;&gt;HB 1751&lt;/a&gt; (PDF), finding the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.austinchronicle.com/gyrobase/ReaderComments/?ContainerID=578316&quot;&gt;anecdotal&lt;/a&gt; link of the patronage of strip clubs with a lack of health insurance and increased sexual assault rates for dancers insufficient, and ordered the state to &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.austinchronicle.com/gyrobase/Blogs/News/?oid=606846&quot;&gt;pay&lt;/a&gt; the plaintiffs&apos; legal fees. &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/metropolitan/5662124.html&quot;&gt;Activists&lt;/a&gt; are already looking to appeal Jenkins&apos; ruling and reenact the tax. (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.metafilter.com/68019/Texas-Taxes-Titties&quot;&gt;Previously on Metafilter.&lt;/a&gt;)  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2008:site.70476</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 01:17:55 -0800</pubDate>

<category>texas</category>

<category>law</category>

<category>austin</category>

<category>dance</category>

<category>dancer</category>

<category>dancing</category>

<category>constitution</category>

<category>billofrights</category>

<category>firstamendment</category>

<category>freespeech</category>

<category>speech</category>

<dc:creator>Blazecock Pileon</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


