<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with DHS and USA</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/DHS+USA</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'DHS' and 'USA' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2006 19:10:50 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2006 19:10:50 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>Geeks wear tinfoil hats too!</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/48229/Geeks%2Dwear%2Dtinfoil%2Dhats%2Dtoo</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://xml.coverpages.org/ni2005-10-14-a.html"&gt;National Information Exchange Model (NIEM)&lt;/a&gt; Sometimes, its the unheralded steps, that take you most quickly to your destination.  

On October 7, 2005, the U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS), the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ), and their associated domains announced the first release of the National Information Exchange Model (NIEM) Version 0.1. NIEM &quot;establishes a single standard XML foundation for exchanging information between DHS, DOJ, and supporting domains, such as Justice, Emergency Management, and Intelligence.&quot;

The release of this specification, and the development of the systems that utilize it may actually be the cataylst for more &apos;progress&apos; in information mining on the individual than most other, well publicized efforts. 

NIEM Mission: &quot;To assist in developing a unified strategy, partnerships, and technical implementations for national information sharing &#8212; laying the foundation for local, state, tribal, and federal interoperability by joining together communities of interest.&quot;

When you say it like that, it sounds sort of cool!  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2006:site.48229</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2006 19:10:50 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>BigBrother</category>
		<category>DHS</category>
		<category>DOJ</category>
		<category>government</category>
		<category>HomelandSecurity</category>
		<category>information</category>
		<category>NIEM</category>
		<category>privacy</category>
		<category>USA</category>
		<category>XML</category>
		<dc:creator>sfts2</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Alarming Article on Security Procedures</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/43322/Alarming%2DArticle%2Don%2DSecurity%2DProcedures</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://alternet.org/story/23362/"&gt;Alarming Article on Security Procedures&lt;/a&gt; What is alarming is not necessarily that there is a &quot;no-fly&quot; list, or that we have security measures in response to a percieved terrorist threat.  What&apos;s alarming is that there seems to be no accountabity or due process demanded from public officials.  Without accountability, what&apos;s to stop public officials from acting arbitrarily, or for some political endeavor?  (See the Plame case.)

Combined with the Right&apos;s seeming position that the president is above the law in prosecuting a war, U.S. Supreme Court Case No. 03-1027 (Rumsfield v. Padilla) and Case No. 03-6696 (Hamdi v. Rumsfield), (see also the recent DOJ position papers), and for the 1st time I am becoming nervous that America might devolve into something like a police state.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2005:site.43322</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jul 2005 10:53:55 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>civilrights</category>
		<category>DHS</category>
		<category>dueprocess</category>
		<category>government</category>
		<category>HomelandSecurity</category>
		<category>justice</category>
		<category>noflylist</category>
		<category>oversight</category>
		<category>security</category>
		<category>terrorism</category>
		<category>USA</category>
		<category>watchlist</category>
		<dc:creator>JKevinKing</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>the odd couple</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/40212/the%2Dodd%2Dcouple</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://news.com.com/Adware+maker+joins+federal+privacy+board/2100-1028_3-5587653.html"&gt;wolves join federal sheep board&lt;/a&gt; (via &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.dailyrotten.com/&quot;&gt;dailyrotten&lt;/a&gt;)  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2005:site.40212</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Mar 2005 01:34:22 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>adware</category>
		<category>Claria</category>
		<category>CNet</category>
		<category>DHS</category>
		<category>Gator</category>
		<category>government</category>
		<category>HomelandSecurity</category>
		<category>privacy</category>
		<category>spyware</category>
		<category>USA</category>
		<dc:creator>Tryptophan-5ht</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>keeping the US safe</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/25791/keeping%2Dthe%2DUS%2Dsafe</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.bayarea.com/mld/mercurynews/news/politics/5868589.htm"&gt;Quoram busting Democrats tracked as terrorists.&lt;/a&gt; Disagree with the majority Party, and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.customs.ustreas.gov/xp/cgov/enforcement/investigative_priorities/amid.xml&quot;&gt;Homeland Security&lt;/a&gt; may like a word with you.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.25791</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2003 09:47:28 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>Democrats</category>
		<category>DHS</category>
		<category>HomelandSecurity</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>USA</category>
		<dc:creator>the fire you left me</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Special Registration: Federal Racial Profiling?</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/24446/Special%2DRegistration%2DFederal%2DRacial%2DProfiling</link>
		<description> &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.post-gazette.com/localnews/20030316special0316ap3.asp&quot;&gt;Muslim men have been asked to undergo &quot;Special Registration&quot;&lt;/a&gt;, a Department of Homeland Security program in its early stages.   Men who hail from 25 targeted countries are required to be fingerprinted, photographed, give up credit card and bank account numbers, and are then given a registration number.  So far, 46 people have been arrested, but none for terrorist-related activities.  Is this an acceptable security precaution or the first sign of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.lib.utah.edu/spc/photo/9066/9066.htm&quot;&gt;history repeating itself&lt;/a&gt;?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2003:site.24446</guid>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2003 16:15:39 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>DHS</category>
		<category>HomelandSecurity</category>
		<category>muslims</category>
		<category>registration</category>
		<category>SpecialRegistration</category>
		<category>USA</category>
		<dc:creator>ed</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/18159/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://washingtontimes.com/national/20020622-42082444.htm"&gt;Department of Homeland Security to be exempt from the Freedom of Information Act and the Whistleblower Protection Act?&lt;/a&gt; The last episode of &lt;a href=http://www.pbs.org/now/politics/foia.html&gt;NOW&lt;/a&gt; ran a &lt;a href=http://portland.bizjournals.com/portland/stories/2002/05/13/newscolumn2.html&gt;piece on the FOIA&lt;/a&gt; which described how back in 1974 President Ford and his staff, which included Donald Rumsfeld and Dick Cheney, opposed Congress&apos; strengthening of the FOIA&lt;/a&gt;, and Ford tried unsuccessfully to veto it.  Now this new exemption looks like the continuation of a 28 year-old feud.  Ridge says it is in order to not &lt;a href=http://www.nytimes.com/2002/06/27/politics/27RIDG.html&gt;&quot;draw a road map of critical infrastructure vulnerabilities,&quot;&lt;/a&gt; but are complete exemptions really necessary for that?  The potential for abuse seems quite dangerous.  (Some previous discussions of FOIA revelations &lt;a href=http://www.metafilter.com/mefi/16919&gt;here&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=http://www.metafilter.com/comments.mefi/17681&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;).  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.18159</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jul 2002 10:12:54 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>DHS</category>
		<category>FOIA</category>
		<category>FreedomOfInformation</category>
		<category>government</category>
		<category>HomelandSecurity</category>
		<category>NYTimes</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>Ridge</category>
		<category>TomRidge</category>
		<category>USA</category>
		<category>WashingtonTimes</category>
		<category>whistleblowers</category>
		<dc:creator>homunculus</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


