<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
     xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel>
	<title>MetaFilter posts tagged with DHS and government</title>
	<link>http://www.metafilter.com/tags/DHS+government</link>
	<description>Posts tagged with 'DHS' and 'government' at MetaFilter.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 17 Aug 2006 21:20:10 -0800</pubDate> <lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Aug 2006 21:20:10 -0800</lastBuildDate>

	<language>en-us</language>
	<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
	<ttl>60</ttl>
	<item>
		<title>This might explain why the U.S. keeps getting caught spying on peaceful war-protestors.</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/53990/This%2Dmight%2Dexplain%2Dwhy%2Dthe%2DUS%2Dkeeps%2Dgetting%2Dcaught%2Dspying%2Don%2Dpeaceful%2Dwarprotestors</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://blog.wired.com/27BStroke6/index.blog?entry_id=1539952"&gt;DHS&apos;s CyberStorm--&lt;/a&gt; --Recognizing the imminent threat hippies and assorted leftists obviously pose to us all, a massive cyber terror simulation (international and involving 115 organizations) recently came to light: &lt;i&gt;...The attack scenario detailed in the presentation is a meticulously plotted parade of cyber horribles led by a &quot;well financed&quot; band of leftist radicals who object to U.S. imperialism, aided by sympathetic independent actors.
At the top of the pyramid is the Worldwide Anti-Globalization Alliance, which sets things off by calling for cyber sit-ins and denial-of-service attacks against U.S. interests. WAGA&apos;s radical arm, the villainous Black Hood Society, ratchets up the tension on day one by probing SCADA computerized control systems and military networks ...&lt;/i&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2006:site.53990</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Aug 2006 21:20:10 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>DHS</category>
		<category>government</category>
		<category>internet</category>
		<category>law</category>
		<category>leftists</category>
		<category>rights</category>
		<category>simulation</category>
		<category>spying</category>
		<category>terror</category>
		<category>threats</category>
		<category>war</category>
		<dc:creator>amberglow</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>D: Yes, it does, because I&apos;ve already had this discussion with him, and I&apos;ve already been asked to change the signs, and I did. And I looked up all the statutes.</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/49236/D%2DYes%2Dit%2Ddoes%2Dbecause%2DIve%2Dalready%2Dhad%2Dthis%2Ddiscussion%2Dwith%2Dhim%2Dand%2DIve%2Dalready%2Dbeen%2Dasked%2Dto%2Dchange%2Dthe%2Dsigns%2Dand%2DI%2Ddid%2DAnd%2DI%2Dlooked%2Dup%2Dall%2Dthe%2Dstatutes</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.boiseweekly.com/gyrobase/Content?oid=oid%3A158729"&gt;Red State, Meet Police State&lt;/a&gt; --take a big anti-Bush bumper sticker, some DHS cops, and an outspoken and educated federal employee. Put them in Boise, Idaho. Mix well. &lt;i&gt;&quot;It&apos;s the First Amendment for a reason--not the last, not the middle. The first.&quot;&lt;/i&gt;  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2006:site.49236</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2006 07:32:54 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>coercion</category>
		<category>DHS</category>
		<category>freespeech</category>
		<category>government</category>
		<category>intimidation</category>
		<category>law</category>
		<category>opposition</category>
		<category>rights</category>
		<dc:creator>amberglow</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Geeks wear tinfoil hats too!</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/48229/Geeks%2Dwear%2Dtinfoil%2Dhats%2Dtoo</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://xml.coverpages.org/ni2005-10-14-a.html"&gt;National Information Exchange Model (NIEM)&lt;/a&gt; Sometimes, its the unheralded steps, that take you most quickly to your destination.  

On October 7, 2005, the U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS), the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ), and their associated domains announced the first release of the National Information Exchange Model (NIEM) Version 0.1. NIEM &quot;establishes a single standard XML foundation for exchanging information between DHS, DOJ, and supporting domains, such as Justice, Emergency Management, and Intelligence.&quot;

The release of this specification, and the development of the systems that utilize it may actually be the cataylst for more &apos;progress&apos; in information mining on the individual than most other, well publicized efforts. 

NIEM Mission: &quot;To assist in developing a unified strategy, partnerships, and technical implementations for national information sharing &#8212; laying the foundation for local, state, tribal, and federal interoperability by joining together communities of interest.&quot;

When you say it like that, it sounds sort of cool!  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2006:site.48229</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2006 19:10:50 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>BigBrother</category>
		<category>DHS</category>
		<category>DOJ</category>
		<category>government</category>
		<category>HomelandSecurity</category>
		<category>information</category>
		<category>NIEM</category>
		<category>privacy</category>
		<category>USA</category>
		<category>XML</category>
		<dc:creator>sfts2</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>Alarming Article on Security Procedures</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/43322/Alarming%2DArticle%2Don%2DSecurity%2DProcedures</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://alternet.org/story/23362/"&gt;Alarming Article on Security Procedures&lt;/a&gt; What is alarming is not necessarily that there is a &quot;no-fly&quot; list, or that we have security measures in response to a percieved terrorist threat.  What&apos;s alarming is that there seems to be no accountabity or due process demanded from public officials.  Without accountability, what&apos;s to stop public officials from acting arbitrarily, or for some political endeavor?  (See the Plame case.)

Combined with the Right&apos;s seeming position that the president is above the law in prosecuting a war, U.S. Supreme Court Case No. 03-1027 (Rumsfield v. Padilla) and Case No. 03-6696 (Hamdi v. Rumsfield), (see also the recent DOJ position papers), and for the 1st time I am becoming nervous that America might devolve into something like a police state.  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2005:site.43322</guid>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jul 2005 10:53:55 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>civilrights</category>
		<category>DHS</category>
		<category>dueprocess</category>
		<category>government</category>
		<category>HomelandSecurity</category>
		<category>justice</category>
		<category>noflylist</category>
		<category>oversight</category>
		<category>security</category>
		<category>terrorism</category>
		<category>USA</category>
		<category>watchlist</category>
		<dc:creator>JKevinKing</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title>the odd couple</title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/40212/the%2Dodd%2Dcouple</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://news.com.com/Adware+maker+joins+federal+privacy+board/2100-1028_3-5587653.html"&gt;wolves join federal sheep board&lt;/a&gt; (via &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.dailyrotten.com/&quot;&gt;dailyrotten&lt;/a&gt;)  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2005:site.40212</guid>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Mar 2005 01:34:22 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>adware</category>
		<category>Claria</category>
		<category>CNet</category>
		<category>DHS</category>
		<category>Gator</category>
		<category>government</category>
		<category>HomelandSecurity</category>
		<category>privacy</category>
		<category>spyware</category>
		<category>USA</category>
		<dc:creator>Tryptophan-5ht</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/18159/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://washingtontimes.com/national/20020622-42082444.htm"&gt;Department of Homeland Security to be exempt from the Freedom of Information Act and the Whistleblower Protection Act?&lt;/a&gt; The last episode of &lt;a href=http://www.pbs.org/now/politics/foia.html&gt;NOW&lt;/a&gt; ran a &lt;a href=http://portland.bizjournals.com/portland/stories/2002/05/13/newscolumn2.html&gt;piece on the FOIA&lt;/a&gt; which described how back in 1974 President Ford and his staff, which included Donald Rumsfeld and Dick Cheney, opposed Congress&apos; strengthening of the FOIA&lt;/a&gt;, and Ford tried unsuccessfully to veto it.  Now this new exemption looks like the continuation of a 28 year-old feud.  Ridge says it is in order to not &lt;a href=http://www.nytimes.com/2002/06/27/politics/27RIDG.html&gt;&quot;draw a road map of critical infrastructure vulnerabilities,&quot;&lt;/a&gt; but are complete exemptions really necessary for that?  The potential for abuse seems quite dangerous.  (Some previous discussions of FOIA revelations &lt;a href=http://www.metafilter.com/mefi/16919&gt;here&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=http://www.metafilter.com/comments.mefi/17681&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;).  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2002:site.18159</guid>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jul 2002 10:12:54 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>brokenlink</category>
		<category>DHS</category>
		<category>FOIA</category>
		<category>FreedomOfInformation</category>
		<category>government</category>
		<category>HomelandSecurity</category>
		<category>NYTimes</category>
		<category>politics</category>
		<category>Ridge</category>
		<category>TomRidge</category>
		<category>USA</category>
		<category>WashingtonTimes</category>
		<category>whistleblowers</category>
		<dc:creator>homunculus</dc:creator>
	</item>
      <item>
		<title></title>
		<link>http://www.metafilter.com/10733/</link>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.suntimes.com/output/terror/cst-nws-ridge22.html"&gt;Potential missile defense system stronger or weaker?&lt;/a&gt; In different days the creation of a cabinet post called &quot;Director of the Office of Homeland Security&quot; would make a lot of people nervous. The choice of Tom Ridge (former Governor of Pennsylvania) could be worse. He served in Vietnam and is known as being &quot;tough on crime&quot;. An interesting note is that while in Congress he &quot;led repeated fights against the anti-missile system nicknamed Star Wars.&quot; Meanwhile, would you want this guys job?  </description>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:metafilter.com,2001:site.10733</guid>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Sep 2001 20:38:10 -0800</pubDate>
		<category>departments</category>
		<category>DHS</category>
		<category>government</category>
		<category>homelandsecurity</category>
		<category>names</category>
		<category>TomRidge</category>
		<dc:creator>jeremias</dc:creator>
	</item>
      
	</channel>
</rss>


